Opinion of the Bible's literalism/historic-truth/scientific-truth/perfection? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 08:55:06 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Religion & Philosophy (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Opinion of the Bible's literalism/historic-truth/scientific-truth/perfection? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Parts of the Bible are divinely-inspired, but not all of the Bible is literally true, in historical or scientific understanding or even moral teaching -- and that truth from God can come from other sources besides the Bible too... (see post)
#1
Agree		  
#2
Disagree		  
#3
Unsure		  
#4
Not Christian		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 28

Author Topic: Opinion of the Bible's literalism/historic-truth/scientific-truth/perfection?  (Read 2888 times)
Former President tack50
tack50
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,880
Spain


« on: December 29, 2020, 05:58:38 AM »
Quote from: Statilius the Epicurean on December 23, 2020, 04:38:38 PM
Quote from: If you are not angry you are an ostrich. on December 22, 2020, 02:00:39 PM
Also, how important is the Hebrew part of the Bible to most Christians. Do you have to take any of it literally to be a Christian?

The Hebrew Bible is (more or less) literally half of the Christian Testament so I would say yes, probably.

I thought that the New Testament essencially "repealed and replaced" the Old Testament in terms of being the "guiding book for Christians"?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 8.561 seconds with 15 queries.