States on "borrowed time" for each party
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 06:04:22 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  States on "borrowed time" for each party
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3
Author Topic: States on "borrowed time" for each party  (Read 3833 times)
pppolitics
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,852


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: April 06, 2020, 03:57:44 PM »

I have previously made a thread about this:

https://talkelections.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=331312.0
   
7 States Where Demographics Haven't Determined Their Political Destiny -- Yet
Logged
Del Tachi
Republican95
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,864
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: 1.46

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: April 07, 2020, 12:03:25 AM »
« Edited: April 07, 2020, 12:16:16 AM by Del Tachi »

"Borrowed time" to me implies that a state has been dominated by its preferred party for quite some time (a generation or longer), demographic/social change away from the dominant party has been established, and the main factor keeping the state in the same column are factors like incumbency, party loyalty + party infrastructure.

I don't think any states are truly on "borrowed time", in this sense, but if I had to name two I'd say Arizona for the GOP and Rhode Island for the Dems.
Logged
Sumner 1868
tara gilesbie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,066
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: April 07, 2020, 12:08:07 AM »

I don't see why people think the northern states will become a GOP bloc unless they think that the entire U.S. is going to have Deep South voting patterns by mid-century.
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,689
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: April 07, 2020, 07:26:55 AM »

"Borrowed time" to me implies that a state has been dominated by its preferred party for quite some time (a generation or longer), demographic/social change away from the dominant party has been established, and the main factor keeping the state in the same column are factors like incumbency, party loyalty + party infrastructure.

I don't think any states are truly on "borrowed time", in this sense, but if I had to name two I'd say Arizona for the GOP and Rhode Island for the Dems.

Or by "borrowed time", a battleground state is or is about to be absorbed into one of the major national party machines.
Logged
S019
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,336
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -1.39

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: April 07, 2020, 11:42:52 AM »

Looking at trends, etc. alone, these are the ones that will almost certainly flip within the next 20 years


R to D: AZ, GA, TX
D to R: MN, ME, MI
Logged
Nightcore Nationalist
Okthisisnotepic.
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,827


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: April 07, 2020, 11:48:47 AM »

NH isn’t really a blue state, it’s always been close.

WI is definitely going to become Safe R one day. Even the suburbs are trending R.

MN has the twin cities metro area that’s still growing; I think Dems are good there.

I don’t know why Maine votes for Democrats in the first place.
Vermont is an underrated GOP pickup oppurtunity in 2020. It's the second-whitest state in the country after West Virginia.

Down the road, probably. But not 2020.

Percentages don’t matter as much for these smaller states. Vermont’s D+26 is really about 70k votes, not some insurmountable 3 million difference like in California.

Plus, Vermont is projected to lose population in upcoming years, just like most Northeast states. Its population in the last decade has stagnated.

This.  Heck, Vermont is a better opportunity than Connecticut/Rhode Island because those have most of their population in one large metro.  Vermont is very rural and much poorer too.
Logged
Dr. MB
MB
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,862
Libyan Arab Jamahiriya



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: April 14, 2020, 02:55:38 PM »

wish we lived in a time where "much poorer" didn't mean "more Republican"
Logged
Calthrina950
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,936
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: April 15, 2020, 12:20:53 AM »

R to D - Texas,  Georgia, Arizona, North Carolina

D to R - Maine, New Mexico, Delaware, Wisconsin

That's about it.

Definitely not New Mexico... and Delaware is too tied to Philadelphia to turn into a red state.

Heavily Democratic New Castle County alone will keep Delaware in the Democratic column.
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,453
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: April 15, 2020, 12:38:09 AM »

R to D - Texas,  Georgia, Arizona, North Carolina

D to R - Maine, New Mexico, Delaware, Wisconsin

That's about it.

Definitely not New Mexico... and Delaware is too tied to Philadelphia to turn into a red state.

Heavily Democratic New Castle County alone will keep Delaware in the Democratic column.
Logged
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,175


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: April 15, 2020, 07:03:32 AM »

People here really know nothing about Vermont.

I don't think we can confidently answer this question about any state. By the time any of these shifts are supposed to happen, there might be a realignment.
Logged
Koharu
jphp
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,644
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: April 15, 2020, 07:07:10 AM »

I can't help but giggle at all the claims for Minnesota. Minnesota hit its ceiling for a Republican with Trump. The rural areas are depopulating fast and the Twin Cities, Rochester, Mankato, and other urban areas are booming. While Republicans may not lose ground, they're certainly not going to gain any.
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,689
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: April 15, 2020, 07:36:40 AM »

I can't help but giggle at all the claims for Minnesota. Minnesota hit its ceiling for a Republican with Trump. The rural areas are depopulating fast and the Twin Cities, Rochester, Mankato, and other urban areas are booming. While Republicans may not lose ground, they're certainly not going to gain any.

What's causing Minnesota to urbanize while people are abandoning cities in Wisconsin, Iowa, and Michigan?
Logged
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,175


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: April 15, 2020, 08:18:28 AM »

wish we lived in a time where "much poorer" didn't mean "more Republican"

It only does if you're talking about white people.
Logged
Agonized-Statism
Anarcho-Statism
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,816


Political Matrix
E: -9.10, S: -5.83

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: April 15, 2020, 09:11:45 AM »

I don't see why people think the northern states will become a GOP bloc unless they think that the entire U.S. is going to have Deep South voting patterns by mid-century.

Generational turnover. Young people in the north are already receptive to the more secular GOP. Demographics are favorable for the party there: white Catholics and shrinking cities. Already, the margins are shrinking and states are flipping. No one is saying they'll be solid, but the party will very likely do what they have to in order to consolidate the region once large parts of the south and southwest go forever.

If not there, where? I wouldn't bet on the map staying the exact same forever.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,702
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: April 16, 2020, 06:08:32 AM »



Since 2020s are big yrs for Dems in Senate from 2020-2025, these states are on borrowed time for Rs
Logged
ProgressiveModerate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,734


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: April 16, 2020, 10:30:12 AM »




Since 2020s are big yrs for Dems in Senate from 2020-2025, these states are on borrowed time for Rs

IA is not on borrowed time for the GOP, just based on how white it is and the lack of cities it should be Dems who are on borrowed time. WV the GOP will on to for a long time, even if they don't win by crazy 40 point margins. KS will never really be competative, it'll just temporarily get a little more blue because the GOP shot itself in the foot there but soon they'll recover. the midwestern states as a whole the cities are shrinking and rural areas are becoming more R, I can't see MI, WI or OH voting D after 2030s unless there's some big wave year. I suspect PA will remain competative because Philly grounds the state and at worst it becomes Lean R. Honestly, when I was very very new to politics I expected PA to be a safe D state.
Logged
Libertas Vel Mors
Haley/Ryan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,279
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: -0.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: April 16, 2020, 03:33:31 PM »

R to D - Texas,  Georgia, Arizona, North Carolina

D to R - Maine, New Mexico, Delaware, Wisconsin

That's about it.

NC's gonna be a swing state for both parties for quite a while longer, rural NC is actually much more populated than people appreciate and is trending rightwards still
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,702
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: April 16, 2020, 06:05:39 PM »




Since 2020s are big yrs for Dems in Senate from 2020-2025, these states are on borrowed time for Rs

IA is not on borrowed time for the GOP, just based on how white it is and the lack of cities it should be Dems who are on borrowed time. WV the GOP will on to for a long time, even if they don't win by crazy 40 point margins. KS will never really be competative, it'll just temporarily get a little more blue because the GOP shot itself in the foot there but soon they'll recover. the midwestern states as a whole the cities are shrinking and rural areas are becoming more R, I can't see MI, WI or OH voting D after 2030s unless there's some big wave year. I suspect PA will remain competative because Philly grounds the state and at worst it becomes Lean R. Honestly, when I was very very new to politics I expected PA to be a safe D state.

I selected IA, because Mike Franken or Greenfield can unseat Ernst and JD Scholten can unseat King. As far as KS, with Kobach winning the primary, Barb Bollier will take this seat
Logged
Don Vito Corleone
bruhgmger2
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,268
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -5.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: April 16, 2020, 11:24:11 PM »

Maine and Georgia are really the only two obvious ones, if you ask me.

However, I’ll also throw Alaska and Montana into the mix.
Why Alaska and Montana?
Logged
Don Vito Corleone
bruhgmger2
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,268
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -5.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: April 16, 2020, 11:30:06 PM »

I think some of the people here are trendwetting.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,702
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: April 18, 2020, 04:06:23 AM »



New map
Logged
annecortez
Rookie
**
Posts: 20
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #46 on: April 19, 2020, 10:51:15 PM »

Thank you for letting me understand this matter.
Logged
Pulaski
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 690


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #47 on: April 20, 2020, 03:27:25 AM »


Illinois trended maybe 5 points to the right between 2000 and 2016, is still a D+15 state, and may well trend back the other way as the suburbs become more Dem-friendly. No way is it going anywhere.
Logged
slothdem
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 532


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #48 on: April 21, 2020, 10:00:08 AM »

Maine and Georgia are really the only two obvious ones, if you ask me.


Really it's Georgia on a different level than everything else, but Maine is the closest Dem analog. New England whites are just so different from non-New England whites, and I believe there is a pretty large age-gap in favor of the dems, so I think they'll remain competitive even as the state becomes bright purple due to demographics.

Georgia Republicans just have no chance under the current coalitions. Next Virginia.
Logged
Nightcore Nationalist
Okthisisnotepic.
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,827


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #49 on: April 23, 2020, 07:06:56 AM »

Maine and Georgia are really the only two obvious ones, if you ask me.


Really it's Georgia on a different level than everything else, but Maine is the closest Dem analog. New England whites are just so different from non-New England whites, and I believe there is a pretty large age-gap in favor of the dems, so I think they'll remain competitive even as the state becomes bright purple due to demographics.

Georgia Republicans just have no chance under the current coalitions. Next Virginia.


Eh, I don't think GA will turn into Virginia (which will be safe D in 5 years and start voting like Illinois or New Jersey) but it will be lean D, like New Hampshire is now.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.065 seconds with 11 queries.