President Spiro Agnew runs for election in his own right in 1976
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 29, 2024, 06:51:56 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  President Spiro Agnew runs for election in his own right in 1976
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: President Spiro Agnew runs for election in his own right in 1976  (Read 3884 times)
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,348


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 17, 2006, 10:46:37 PM »

In August, 1974, President Richard Nixon is forced to resign the Presidency of the United States as a result of his involvement in the "Watergate Scandal," which amounted to his subversion of the constitution and the breach of his oath of office.  He either reisgned, or he faced inevitable impeachment in Congress.

Vice President Spiro Agnew, a man of unimpeachable integrity and unquestionable honor, is sworn as the 38th President of the United States on August 9, 1974.  Agnew had served as Governor of Maryland from 1967 to 1969, and had run an administration noted for its honesty and openness.  He had served as Vice President of the United States since 1969, and had conducted himself in the Vice Presidency with the utmost integrity.  While President, Agnew led the administration the same way he had conducted himself as Governor and as Vice President, honest, open, fair, and competently.

The highly principled President Agnew refused to pardon Nixon, stating that "no one, not even the President of the United States, is above the law.  I cannot, in all good conscience, pardon criminal behavior.  It would go against every fiber of my being, and against all I have stood for and have fought for my entire public life."

After his swearing in as President of the United States in August, 1974, Agnew nominated Senator Howard Baker of Tennessee to replace him as Vice President.  Senator Baker had been serving in the Senate since 1967, and was widely respected amongst his colleagues and the public at large.  Baker was known as the "Great Cinciliator," and had a reputation as one of the most successful Senators in terms of brokering compromises, enacting legislation, and maintaining civility.

Baker won quick and overwhelming approval from the House and Senate to become the new Vice President.

Going into the 1976 election, the Republican ticket of President Spiro Agnew and Vice President Howard Baker promised to lead an administration that would continue to be uncompromising in it's honesty, openness, and fairness.

The Democrats nominated the moderate, one term, Georgia Governor Jimmy Carter for President, and the experienced, liberal, Minnesota Senator Walter Mondale for Vice President.

Your thoughts please on how such a scenario would play out in the election.  Who wins given these circumstances?  What would a map of the election look like?     

 
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 17, 2006, 11:34:20 PM »

Well, you'd have to re-invent Agnew from about 1968.  He was long considered "Impeachment Insurance" for Nixon.
Logged
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,348


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 18, 2006, 11:58:23 AM »

That's the whole point of this thread.

We all know about Spiro Agnew's real life involvement in accepting bribes.

For purposes of this thread, as stated in my scenario, Spiro Agnew is the model of honesty and integrity, and is above reproach, and, in this scenario, always has been.

Those are the circumstances under which this election is to be addressed.  The "What IF" Agnew, not the real Agnew.   
Logged
Reaganfan
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,239
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 18, 2006, 12:46:33 PM »

Well, if Agnew was loyal and a good president, I say he beats Carter in a landslide...



President Agnew/Baker: 357
Governor Carter/Mondale: 181
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,157
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 18, 2006, 09:13:25 PM »
« Edited: February 18, 2006, 11:35:03 PM by Senator Ernest »

Other than not pardoning Nixon, what else is different about the Agnew presidency from the Ford presidency?
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 18, 2006, 09:42:28 PM »

Other than not pardoning Nixon, what else id different about the Agnew presidency from the Ford presidency?

On the pro side, Agnew was a conservative.  There would have no major challenge from the right.  Even if Reagan had run, a lot of his supporters would have voted for Agnew.
Logged
Akno21
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,066
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 18, 2006, 11:28:18 PM »

Vice President Spiro Agnew, a man of unimpeachable integrity and unquestionable honor, is sworn as the 38th President of the United States on August 9, 1974.  Agnew had served as Governor of Maryland from 1967 to 1969, and had run an administration noted for its honesty and openness.  He had served as Vice President of the United States since 1969, and had conducted himself in the Vice Presidency with the utmost integrity.  While President, Agnew led the administration the same way he had conducted himself as Governor and as Vice President, honest, open, fair, and competently.

Jimmy Carter, a man not afraid to use the might of the United States in the world, easily wins against Agnew. When Carter leaves office eight years later, he is widely applauded for his role in causing the downfall of the Soviet Union, winning praise from both Ted Kennedy and even Agnew himself. While in office, Carter carries himself in a most Presidential manner. The only major criticism of the Carter Administration is that it was too tough on terror.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,157
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: February 18, 2006, 11:46:00 PM »

Other than not pardoning Nixon, what else is different about the Agnew presidency from the Ford presidency?

On the pro side, Agnew was a conservative.  There would have no major challenge from the right.  Even if Reagan had run, a lot of his supporters would have voted for Agnew.

But how does that translate into policies?

Does Agnew try either Nixon-style price controls or a return to the gold standard to combat inflation?

Does he send troops in to prop up the South Vietnamese when the North invades?

Who does he select to replace Justice Douglas?

Does the New York Daily News run the headline: Agnew to City: Drop Dead?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.03 seconds with 13 queries.