MI (Target-Insyght) - Biden +41 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 20, 2024, 12:08:25 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  MI (Target-Insyght) - Biden +41 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MI (Target-Insyght) - Biden +41  (Read 2989 times)
Sir Mohamed
MohamedChalid
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,645
United States



« on: March 09, 2020, 10:38:07 AM »

Logged
Sir Mohamed
MohamedChalid
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,645
United States



« Reply #1 on: March 09, 2020, 10:54:35 AM »

I know that Sanders pulled off an upset in 2016 while polling badly, but I can't imagine the polls being this far off now. 2016 was also a different race and Hillary was much more unpopular than Biden.

Many Sanders 2016 votes were merely protest voters against HRC, who did poorly with WWCs in rural areas. Biden has done well with them in ST primaries. So this isn't a factor anymore. The same happened / will happen in Appalachia primaries such as WV and KY, though I doubt Sanders will be in the race by May, when these states vote. If recent polls are remotely accurate, Sanders is done by the end of March at latest.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 14 queries.