Last time the other party won
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 06:45:57 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Last time the other party won
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Last time the other party won  (Read 555 times)
Plankton5165
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 684


P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 28, 2020, 07:27:03 PM »
« edited: February 29, 2020, 06:07:51 AM by Plankton5165 »

You can see the last two digits of years. But the longest streak started in 1964.



Hard to be seen:
HI - 84
DC - N/A
CT - 88
DE - 88
NJ - 88
RI - 84
VT - 88
NH - 00

Nebraska's 2nd district is supposed to say 08, while Maine's 2nd district is supposed to say 12.
Logged
darklordoftech
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,437
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 28, 2020, 07:33:00 PM »

If it wasn’t for The Perot Effect in 1996, Arizona would have voted for the same party since 1952!
Logged
Podgy the Bear
mollybecky
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,975


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 29, 2020, 12:27:30 PM »

If it wasn’t for The Perot Effect in 1996, Arizona would have voted for the same party since 1952!

Exit polls in 1996 indicated that the outcome of the race in Arizona would be the same if Perot were not in the race.  It was similar as to what happened in Florida that year.

https://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/AZPxp.html
Logged
morgankingsley
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,018
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 29, 2020, 07:12:22 PM »

I always found some interest in the fact that there have been so many trends that started as early as 1964, with the Dakotas, Wyoming, and Idaho. With the democrats, it took over a decade longer to start getting strong voting patterns in many states
Logged
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,197
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: March 01, 2020, 01:57:39 PM »

If it wasn’t for The Perot Effect in 1996, Arizona would have voted for the same party since 1952!

No, Clinton put too much into the state...he literally did better there than Nevada. (This might've happened in 2016 if Hillary hadn't wasted so much on Ohio and NC)
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 11 queries.