Who will/did you vote for (Feb. 2020 edition - Democratic Primaries)

[CivicParticipant]

Definitely Bernie Sanders during the PA primary on April 28th.

[European Lefty]

#3: I believe what Bloomberg is trying to do is immoral and voting for his strongest challenger is in essence a vote against Bloomberg. He's a fascist trying to buy the election.

You are literally a Donald Trump supporter.

Trump used very little of his money in the election. He had grassroots support. There is a big difference between Bloomberg and Trump. BIG

Mostly that one is a successful businessman, and the other is Donald Trump.

[For Raza livin in La La/Like Gaza onto the dawn of Intifada]

#3: I believe what Bloomberg is trying to do is immoral and voting for his strongest challenger is in essence a vote against Bloomberg. He's a fascist trying to buy the election.

You are literally a Donald Trump supporter.

Trump used very little of his money in the election. He had grassroots support. There is a big difference between Bloomberg and Trump. BIG

He quite literally and factually used the office of the Presidency to ask a foreign government to help him rig an election.

[SN2903]

#3: I believe what Bloomberg is trying to do is immoral and voting for his strongest challenger is in essence a vote against Bloomberg. He's a fascist trying to buy the election.

You are literally a Donald Trump supporter.

Trump used very little of his money in the election. He had grassroots support. There is a big difference between Bloomberg and Trump. BIG

He quite literally and factually used the office of the Presidency to ask a foreign government to help him rig an election.

O please. You think he was that worried about Biden? Come on..He never made a direct request. It was just talk.

[European Lefty]

#3: I believe what Bloomberg is trying to do is immoral and voting for his strongest challenger is in essence a vote against Bloomberg. He's a fascist trying to buy the election.

You are literally a Donald Trump supporter.

Trump used very little of his money in the election. He had grassroots support. There is a big difference between Bloomberg and Trump. BIG

He quite literally and factually used the office of the Presidency to ask a foreign government to help him rig an election.

O please. You think he was that worried about Biden? Come on..He never made a direct request. It was just talk.

Oh, clearly that makes it all alright then!

[Arturo Belano]

100% voting for Sanders

[Frodo]

I'll be voting for Amy Klobuchar.

[For Raza livin in La La/Like Gaza onto the dawn of Intifada]

#3: I believe what Bloomberg is trying to do is immoral and voting for his strongest challenger is in essence a vote against Bloomberg. He's a fascist trying to buy the election.

You are literally a Donald Trump supporter.

Trump used very little of his money in the election. He had grassroots support. There is a big difference between Bloomberg and Trump. BIG

He quite literally and factually used the office of the Presidency to ask a foreign government to help him rig an election.

O please. You think he was that worried about Biden? Come on..He never made a direct request. It was just talk.

1. You are wrong and lying and you know it.
2. If you think discussing a crime cannot be a crime, you do not know anything about the law.

[Mr. Illini]

Warren is my preferred candidate and at this point I plan to vote for her. I have been watching closely in case a candidate with better odds can sway me and that has not happened yet. There's still a month before I vote, so we'll see if it happens between now and then.

I will be voting for the Democratic nominee in the general election.

As far as friends and family go, it is a pretty mixed bag. Several are with Warren like me, with a handful favoring Bernie and a few for Biden as well. The Biden supporters are considering going to Bloomberg or Pete.

[Clarko95 📚💰📈]

I'm abstaining in the Dem Presidential nomination (skipping the top of the ballot). Will still order my ballot to vote downballot, and of course will vote straight-Dem in November.

[MillennialModerate]

The frustration of seeing people refuse to vote for Mike against Trump is just.. next level.

You think people would learn the lesson of voting for Jill Stein.

To me, this country re-electing someone like Trump is unforgivable.

I’d trade 20 years of GOP trifecta for Trump to be defeated, so to see
people stubbornly refuse to support him if he were the nominee is just ..

I don’t even know the word but it’s short sighted. It’s stubborn. It’s selfish.

[For Raza livin in La La/Like Gaza onto the dawn of Intifada]

The frustration of seeing people refuse to vote for Mike against Trump is just.. next level.

You think people would learn the lesson of voting for Jill Stein.

To me, this country re-electing someone like Trump is unforgivable.

I’d trade 20 years of GOP trifecta for Trump to be defeated, so to see
people stubbornly refuse to support him if he were the nominee is just ..

I don’t even know the word but it’s short sighted. It’s stubborn. It’s selfish.

You'd trade 20 years of GOP trifecta so they could pass the same exact agenda that Trump would pursue (just more quietly) to get Trump out of office? Are you insane?

Speaking for myself, I am hesitant to vote for Bloomberg as the Democratic nominee because I see it as giving me the choice between a fascist and a moderate Republican. And I don't want to vote for the Republican to not have the fascist. I'd rather focus efforts towards stifling Trump legislatively and pushing for a progressive agenda for the Democrats to pursue in 2022 and 2024, when conditions would be more favorable to Democrats.

[Mr. Illini]

The frustration of seeing people refuse to vote for Mike against Trump is just.. next level.

You think people would learn the lesson of voting for Jill Stein.

To me, this country re-electing someone like Trump is unforgivable.

I’d trade 20 years of GOP trifecta for Trump to be defeated, so to see
people stubbornly refuse to support him if he were the nominee is just ..

I don’t even know the word but it’s short sighted. It’s stubborn. It’s selfish.

Considering that 20 years of a Republican trifecta would mean the repeal of the ACA, privatization of Social Security and Medicare, gutting if not elimination of the EPA, endless tax breaks for the wealthy, etc etc, I am not with you there lol.

That said, I agree it would be very selfish and self-defeating to not support the Democratic nominee, especially for those in swing states like Wisconsin and Pennsylvania.

Bloomberg sucks imo, but he is preferable to Donald Trump. At the least, we know that the ACA would be safe, we would re-enter the Paris Agreement, we'd re-establish a hard line against Putin and repair our relationships with Europe, and we'd re-open diplomacy with Iran.

[JGibson]

Warren when my state votes on March 17th if she's still in the race. If she drops out before then, likely Sanders.

[The People's Liberation Army of Rancho Cucamonga]

Biden 100%

or Bloomberg if he’s out.

Electability is my only consideration
and if you’re not Pro-Trump it should
be yours as well

Yep, the most electable candidate is typically known for placing fifth in New Hampshire.

The results of one states primary or caucus where voters are ideological far more liberal than the general election electorate - and in a state where the demographics don’t represent that of the nation at large ... don’t represent who is electable and who isn’t.

Well, it's the only data we have so far, and considering that your opinion of Biden's electability is based on nothing more than a gut feeling, I'll defer to the voters on this one.

[ElectionsGuy]

Sanders - on April 7th (or earlier if I early vote)

This place is a lot more pro-Sanders than it used to be.

[SN2903]

Sanders - on April 7th (or earlier if I early vote)

This place is a lot more pro-Sanders than it used to be.

It's not. All the Biden voters are just embarrassed and not posting.