Who will/did you vote for (Feb. 2020 edition - Democratic Primaries)

[Blue3]

Who will/did you vote for?
(February 2020 edition - Democratic Primaries)

[Blue3]

For the person who already voted and their candidate dropped out, I'm curious, who?

[TML]

If Sanders is still in the race by the time my state's primary rolls around, I'll cast a primary vote for him. If he has dropped out by then, I will probably boycott the presidential primary vote altogether.

[For Trump, everything. For immigrants, the law]

I'll definitely be voting for Sanders.

[Gass3268]

Warren, probably even if she's already dropped out. She's the only one worth a damn.

[Gone to Carolina]

Already early voted for Sanders.

[Interlocutor]

Already sent in my mail ballot for Bernie

[The People's Liberation Army of Rancho Cucamonga]

For the person who already voted and their candidate dropped out, I'm curious, who?

Yang Gang

Although to be fair, I filled out my ballot after he dropped out.

[MillennialModerate]

Biden 100%

or Bloomberg if he’s out.

Electability is my only consideration
and if you’re not Pro-Trump it should
be yours as well

[The People's Liberation Army of Rancho Cucamonga]

Biden 100%

or Bloomberg if he’s out.

Electability is my only consideration
and if you’re not Pro-Trump it should
be yours as well

Yep, the most electable candidate is typically known for placing fifth in New Hampshire.

[For Raza livin in La La/Like Gaza onto the dawn of Intifada]

Sanders.

[andjey]

I can't vote because I'm not US citizen, but would vote for Biden or Klobuchar if her chances to win in my state higher than Biden's chances

[here2view]

Will be voting for Biden on March 3rd, while my girlfriend will likely vote for Bernie when Connecticut votes in late April.

[OkThen]

Warren.

[redjohn]

Will be voting for Sanders, as will most of my liberal friends & family.

[MillennialModerate]

Biden 100%

or Bloomberg if he’s out.

Electability is my only consideration
and if you’re not Pro-Trump it should
be yours as well

Yep, the most electable candidate is typically known for placing fifth in New Hampshire.

The results of one states primary or caucus where voters are ideological far more liberal than the general election electorate - and in a state where the demographics don’t represent that of the nation at large ... don’t represent who is electable and who isn’t.

[MillennialModerate]

Biden 100%

or Bloomberg if he’s out.

Electability is my only consideration
and if you’re not Pro-Trump it should
be yours as well

Yep, the most electable candidate is typically known for placing fifth in New Hampshire.

The results of one states primary or caucus where voters are ideological far more liberal than the general election electorate - and in a state where the demographics don’t represent that of the nation at large ... don’t represent who is electable and who isn’t.

[SN2903]

Voting for Bernie for 3 reasons:

#1: I believe he would be the easiest for Trump to beat in November.

#2: He has integrity and is the least paid off of the Democratic nominees (besides Tulsi). I actually like him as a person just disagree with most of his policies.

#3: I believe what Bloomberg is trying to do is immoral and voting for his strongest challenger is in essence a vote against Bloomberg. He's a fascist trying to buy the election.

[#TheShadowyAbyss]

Sanders

[For Raza livin in La La/Like Gaza onto the dawn of Intifada]

Biden 100%

or Bloomberg if he’s out.

Electability is my only consideration
and if you’re not Pro-Trump it should
be yours as well

Yep, the most electable candidate is typically known for placing fifth in New Hampshire.

The results of one states primary or caucus where voters are ideological far more liberal than the general election electorate - and in a state where the demographics don’t represent that of the nation at large ... don’t represent who is electable and who isn’t.

So your idea of electability is winning theoretically, not in reality. Ok. President Hillary Clinton would like a word with you.

[Illiniwek]

I will vote for the strongest non-Biden/Sanders/Bloomberg option that comes out of Super Tuesday.

If no non-Biden/Sanders/Bloomberg option is viable at that point, I will vote for the candidate who at that time looks to be the frontrunner in generating the most enthusiastic support in the general, who I predict will be Bernie.

I believe what Bloomberg is trying to do is immoral . . .  He's a fascist trying to buy the election.

That is rich.

[For Raza livin in La La/Like Gaza onto the dawn of Intifada]

#3: I believe what Bloomberg is trying to do is immoral and voting for his strongest challenger is in essence a vote against Bloomberg. He's a fascist trying to buy the election.

You are literally a Donald Trump supporter.

[RI]

#3: I believe what Bloomberg is trying to do is immoral and voting for his strongest challenger is in essence a vote against Bloomberg. He's a fascist trying to buy the election.

You are literally a Donald Trump supporter.

Trump didn't need to buy the election. CNN gave him airtime for free.

[SN2903]

#3: I believe what Bloomberg is trying to do is immoral and voting for his strongest challenger is in essence a vote against Bloomberg. He's a fascist trying to buy the election.

You are literally a Donald Trump supporter.

Trump used very little of his money in the election. He had grassroots support. There is a big difference between Bloomberg and Trump. BIG

[redjohn]

Come the general, I'd vote for Sanders (my current pick), Warren, Biden, Klobuchar, and Buttigieg. I won't be voting for Mike, though. I'll vote third party if Bloomberg is the nominee. He's a racist, sexist creep oligarch and I'd rather have four more years of Trump's horrible Presidency (under a Republican administration) than eight years of Bloomberg as a Democrat.