Clinton says "nobody likes" Sanders and calls him a "career politician"

[DrScholl]

https://twitter.com/berniesanders/status/794941635931099136?lang=en

This tweet right here was a fairly odd thing to say for someone who supposedly supported Clinton. It was almost as if he was encouraging his supporters to vote for Trump. He is a sneaky person and knew what he was posting. Clinton can say what she wants about him.

Saying that many of those who support Trump aren't racist or sexist isn't the same as saying Trump isn't racist or sexist. Plus, it's not like saying those who support Trump are horrible worked out too well for Clinton. Even if you believe that most of Trump's supporters are racist, that's not something you should explicitly say as a candidate.

Tweeting out anything right before the election that even implies that it is ok to vote for the opposition is wrong. Sanders is not that stupid.

[Türkisblau]

[snip]

This tweet right here was a fairly odd thing to say for someone who supposedly supported Clinton. It was almost as if he was encouraging his supporters to vote for Trump. He is a sneaky person and knew what he was posting. Clinton can say what she wants about him.

It's called not insulting people who you want to win over. How thick can people be.

That's not what his intent was. Who tweets out that it's ok to vote for the opposition under any circumstances right before the election? That is totally absurd.

You are being about as unfair in your reading as you can be. Where did he say that it's ok? He pointed out Trump's status as a racist and a sexist a million times. You are taking a statement that is trying to bring people back into the fold to meaning the opposite.

[Mad Deadly Worldwide Communist Gangster Computer God]

https://twitter.com/berniesanders/status/794941635931099136?lang=en
This tweet right here was a fairly odd thing to say for someone who supposedly supported Clinton. It was almost as if he was encouraging his supporters to vote for Trump. He is a sneaky person and knew what he was posting. Clinton can say what she wants about him.

Saying that many of those who support Trump aren't racist or sexist isn't the same as saying Trump isn't racist or sexist. Plus, it's not like saying those who support Trump are horrible worked out too well for Clinton. Even if you believe that most of Trump's supporters are racist, that's not something you should explicitly say as a candidate.

Tweeting out anything right before the election that even implies that it is ok to vote for the opposition is wrong. Sanders is not that stupid.

Saying that it's okay to vote for the opposition =/= Saying that people who do aren't racist or sexist

Maybe if Hillary had learned the same thing and humbled herself, she would be president right now.

[Green Line]

This is why we all love Hillary.  She says it like it is!

[Rookie Yinzer]

All Hillary's people know how to run campaigns is to insult people and then blame every single person in the universe when they lose. Don't bother with logic.

That's what Bernie Sanders did when he lost the nomination. :-x

He wrote off Clinton's wins in Southern states with large black populations where they were rejecting him 4:1 by saying those were just conservative states but touted his wins in heavily white conservative states like Kansas, Oklahoma, and Nebraska but go off.

[President Johnson]

Of course Bernie Bros are triggered over her remarks, which are not insults, but statement of facts. Bernie is a career politician who did not get a lot of stuff done because he likes to impose purity tests and many of his devoted supports regard compromise as treason. It's always not healthy if support for one specific leader emerges as a cult.

I also wonder whether there is double standard for her due to being a woman. As a private citizen, she is free to speak her mind if she wants to and I find it kind of absurd to demand she should just be quiet.

[Rookie Yinzer]

[snip]

This tweet right here was a fairly odd thing to say for someone who supposedly supported Clinton. It was almost as if he was encouraging his supporters to vote for Trump. He is a sneaky person and knew what he was posting. Clinton can say what she wants about him.

It's called not insulting people who you want to win over. How thick can people be.

That's not what his intent was. Who tweets out that it's ok to vote for the opposition under any circumstances right before the election? That is totally absurd.

You are being about as unfair in your reading as you can be. Where did he say that it's ok? He pointed out Trump's status as a racist and a sexist a million times. You are taking a statement that is trying to bring people back into the fold to meaning the opposite.

His wife that bankrupted a college said it, or do we only hold Hillary Clinton accountable for their spouse's actions?

[DrScholl]

https://twitter.com/berniesanders/status/794941635931099136?lang=en
This tweet right here was a fairly odd thing to say for someone who supposedly supported Clinton. It was almost as if he was encouraging his supporters to vote for Trump. He is a sneaky person and knew what he was posting. Clinton can say what she wants about him.

Saying that many of those who support Trump aren't racist or sexist isn't the same as saying Trump isn't racist or sexist. Plus, it's not like saying those who support Trump are horrible worked out too well for Clinton. Even if you believe that most of Trump's supporters are racist, that's not something you should explicitly say as a candidate.

Tweeting out anything right before the election that even implies that it is ok to vote for the opposition is wrong. Sanders is not that stupid.

Saying that it's okay to vote for the opposition =/= Saying that people who do aren't racist or sexist

Maybe if Hillary had learned the same thing and humbled herself, she would be president right now.

Why was it necessary for him to say that? Voters know what their intentions are and don't need a politician to tell them anything. It was just an odd thing to tweet right before any election especially from someone who never really conceded that they lost the primary.

[Devout Centrist]

She has absolutely no one to blame but herself for her humiliating loss in 2016. After 4 years, she still doesn't get it.

[DrScholl]

She has absolutely no one to blame but herself for her humiliating loss in 2016. After 4 years, she still doesn't get it.

That's not even the point. The point is that Sanders has issues of his own and it isn't unfair to point that out. He's displayed moodiness and rudeness on camera and those things can add up with voters. With that said, Clinton has zero obligation to help his campaign or to be friends with him.

[Devout Centrist]

She has absolutely no one to blame but herself for her humiliating loss in 2016. After 4 years, she still doesn't get it.

That's not even the point. The point is that Sanders has issues of his own and it isn't unfair to point that out. He's displayed moodiness and rudeness on camera and those things can add up with voters. With that said, Clinton has zero obligation to help his campaign or to be friends with him.

Delivered by a woman who shopped around for a Senate seat, who ruthlessly demonized Barack Obama in the 2008 primary, and who has stood as the foremost reminder of Democratic incompetence.

The fact that she is religitating these issues now is telling. I have not an ounce of respect left for her.

[Türkisblau]

She has absolutely no one to blame but herself for her humiliating loss in 2016. After 4 years, she still doesn't get it.

That's not even the point. The point is that Sanders has issues of his own and it isn't unfair to point that out. He's displayed moodiness and rudeness on camera and those things can add up with voters. With that said, Clinton has zero obligation to help his campaign or to be friends with him.

This just in: Voters hate it when politicians show human emotion.

[Türkisblau]

Meanwhile RFKFan is bringing up bog-standard smears in a non-sequitur response to my post. How low can discourse on Atlas possibly go?

[DrScholl]

She has absolutely no one to blame but herself for her humiliating loss in 2016. After 4 years, she still doesn't get it.

That's not even the point. The point is that Sanders has issues of his own and it isn't unfair to point that out. He's displayed moodiness and rudeness on camera and those things can add up with voters. With that said, Clinton has zero obligation to help his campaign or to be friends with him.

Delivered by a woman who shopped around for a Senate seat, who ruthlessly demonized Barack Obama in the 2008 primary, and who has stood as the foremost reminder of Democratic incompetence.

The fact that she is religitating these issues now is telling. I have not an ounce of respect left for her.

I don't think she ever claimed to be perfect, unlike Sanders who claims to be the best politicians ever who has never made a mistake in his life.

Nothing is being rehashed, because she didn't say he caused her to lose, she is putting truth out that about him that has been out there for a long time. He's a nasty diva who thinks he is better than everyone.

[Devout Centrist]

She has absolutely no one to blame but herself for her humiliating loss in 2016. After 4 years, she still doesn't get it.

That's not even the point. The point is that Sanders has issues of his own and it isn't unfair to point that out. He's displayed moodiness and rudeness on camera and those things can add up with voters. With that said, Clinton has zero obligation to help his campaign or to be friends with him.

Delivered by a woman who shopped around for a Senate seat, who ruthlessly demonized Barack Obama in the 2008 primary, and who has stood as the foremost reminder of Democratic incompetence.

The fact that she is religitating these issues now is telling. I have not an ounce of respect left for her.

I don't think she ever claimed to be perfect, unlike Sanders who claims to be the best politicians ever who has never made a mistake in his life.

Lol where are you getting this from? 'Bernie says he's consistently anti-war' --- "Bernie says he's perfect and the best at everything!"

Nothing is being rehashed, because she didn't say he caused her to lose, she is putting truth out that about him that has been out there for a long time. He's a nasty diva who thinks he is better than everyone.

Are you blind, this a total rehash! She is absolutely furious that Bernie didn't drop out after Super Tuesday and she will never let that go.

[DrScholl]

She has absolutely no one to blame but herself for her humiliating loss in 2016. After 4 years, she still doesn't get it.

That's not even the point. The point is that Sanders has issues of his own and it isn't unfair to point that out. He's displayed moodiness and rudeness on camera and those things can add up with voters. With that said, Clinton has zero obligation to help his campaign or to be friends with him.

This just in: Voters hate it when politicians show human emotion.

When you have a clearly nasty personality and think you are superior to everyone else it's not a great trait in a candidate. There is a difference between emotion and just being a plain nasty.

[Türkisblau]

She has absolutely no one to blame but herself for her humiliating loss in 2016. After 4 years, she still doesn't get it.

That's not even the point. The point is that Sanders has issues of his own and it isn't unfair to point that out. He's displayed moodiness and rudeness on camera and those things can add up with voters. With that said, Clinton has zero obligation to help his campaign or to be friends with him.

Delivered by a woman who shopped around for a Senate seat, who ruthlessly demonized Barack Obama in the 2008 primary, and who has stood as the foremost reminder of Democratic incompetence.

The fact that she is religitating these issues now is telling. I have not an ounce of respect left for her.

I don't think she ever claimed to be perfect, unlike Sanders who claims to be the best politicians ever who has never made a mistake in his life.

Nothing is being rehashed, because she didn't say he caused her to lose, she is putting truth out that about him that has been out there for a long time. He's a nasty diva who thinks he is better than everyone.

Nowhere has he ever claimed he was perfect or better than anyone, but it's pretty easy to think so when his opponents are such trash.

[Roblox]

Bernie Sanders could've committed sepuku on stage as a blood sacrifice to Hilary, and her fans would still attack him and his supporters because of the tone he uttered his last words in or something.

[gerritcole]

Meanwhile RFKFan is bringing up bog-standard smears in a non-sequitur response to my post. How low can discourse on Atlas possibly go?

it was never particularly high. atlas is truly a reflection of society

[Mad Deadly Worldwide Communist Gangster Computer God]

https://twitter.com/berniesanders/status/794941635931099136?lang=en
This tweet right here was a fairly odd thing to say for someone who supposedly supported Clinton. It was almost as if he was encouraging his supporters to vote for Trump. He is a sneaky person and knew what he was posting. Clinton can say what she wants about him.

Saying that many of those who support Trump aren't racist or sexist isn't the same as saying Trump isn't racist or sexist. Plus, it's not like saying those who support Trump are horrible worked out too well for Clinton. Even if you believe that most of Trump's supporters are racist, that's not something you should explicitly say as a candidate.

Tweeting out anything right before the election that even implies that it is ok to vote for the opposition is wrong. Sanders is not that stupid.

Saying that it's okay to vote for the opposition =/= Saying that people who do aren't racist or sexist

Maybe if Hillary had learned the same thing and humbled herself, she would be president right now.

Why was it necessary for him to say that? Voters know what their intentions are and don't need a politician to tell them anything. It was just an odd thing to tweet right before any election especially from someone who never really conceded that they lost the primary.

I don't know, I don't live inside his head.  Why did Hillary call her opponents' supporters deplorable?

[DrScholl]

https://twitter.com/berniesanders/status/794941635931099136?lang=en
This tweet right here was a fairly odd thing to say for someone who supposedly supported Clinton. It was almost as if he was encouraging his supporters to vote for Trump. He is a sneaky person and knew what he was posting. Clinton can say what she wants about him.

Saying that many of those who support Trump aren't racist or sexist isn't the same as saying Trump isn't racist or sexist. Plus, it's not like saying those who support Trump are horrible worked out too well for Clinton. Even if you believe that most of Trump's supporters are racist, that's not something you should explicitly say as a candidate.

Tweeting out anything right before the election that even implies that it is ok to vote for the opposition is wrong. Sanders is not that stupid.

Saying that it's okay to vote for the opposition =/= Saying that people who do aren't racist or sexist

Maybe if Hillary had learned the same thing and humbled herself, she would be president right now.

Why was it necessary for him to say that? Voters know what their intentions are and don't need a politician to tell them anything. It was just an odd thing to tweet right before any election especially from someone who never really conceded that they lost the primary.

I don't know, I don't live inside his head.  Why did Hillary call her opponents' supporters deplorable?

Maybe because a lot of them are deplorable? The past three years have demonstrated that a lot of them are and many people have woken up to that fact.

[Mad Deadly Worldwide Communist Gangster Computer God]

https://twitter.com/berniesanders/status/794941635931099136?lang=en
This tweet right here was a fairly odd thing to say for someone who supposedly supported Clinton. It was almost as if he was encouraging his supporters to vote for Trump. He is a sneaky person and knew what he was posting. Clinton can say what she wants about him.

Saying that many of those who support Trump aren't racist or sexist isn't the same as saying Trump isn't racist or sexist. Plus, it's not like saying those who support Trump are horrible worked out too well for Clinton. Even if you believe that most of Trump's supporters are racist, that's not something you should explicitly say as a candidate.

Tweeting out anything right before the election that even implies that it is ok to vote for the opposition is wrong. Sanders is not that stupid.

Saying that it's okay to vote for the opposition =/= Saying that people who do aren't racist or sexist

Maybe if Hillary had learned the same thing and humbled herself, she would be president right now.

Why was it necessary for him to say that? Voters know what their intentions are and don't need a politician to tell them anything. It was just an odd thing to tweet right before any election especially from someone who never really conceded that they lost the primary.

I don't know, I don't live inside his head.  Why did Hillary call her opponents' supporters deplorable?

Maybe because a lot of them are deplorable? The past three years have demonstrated that a lot of them are and many people have woken up to that fact.

And that, my friend, is why you lose.

[It’s so Joever]

I mean, she isn’t wrong, but this is the worst time for her to say something like this. What an idiot. She should have either said it outright in 2017 or not say anything at all.

[gerritcole]

https://twitter.com/berniesanders/status/794941635931099136?lang=en
This tweet right here was a fairly odd thing to say for someone who supposedly supported Clinton. It was almost as if he was encouraging his supporters to vote for Trump. He is a sneaky person and knew what he was posting. Clinton can say what she wants about him.

Saying that many of those who support Trump aren't racist or sexist isn't the same as saying Trump isn't racist or sexist. Plus, it's not like saying those who support Trump are horrible worked out too well for Clinton. Even if you believe that most of Trump's supporters are racist, that's not something you should explicitly say as a candidate.

Tweeting out anything right before the election that even implies that it is ok to vote for the opposition is wrong. Sanders is not that stupid.

Saying that it's okay to vote for the opposition =/= Saying that people who do aren't racist or sexist

Maybe if Hillary had learned the same thing and humbled herself, she would be president right now.

Why was it necessary for him to say that? Voters know what their intentions are and don't need a politician to tell them anything. It was just an odd thing to tweet right before any election especially from someone who never really conceded that they lost the primary.

I don't know, I don't live inside his head.  Why did Hillary call her opponents' supporters deplorable?

Maybe because a lot of them are deplorable? The past three years have demonstrated that a lot of them are and many people have woken up to that fact.

tolerant left strikes again

[DrScholl]

https://twitter.com/berniesanders/status/794941635931099136?lang=en
This tweet right here was a fairly odd thing to say for someone who supposedly supported Clinton. It was almost as if he was encouraging his supporters to vote for Trump. He is a sneaky person and knew what he was posting. Clinton can say what she wants about him.

Saying that many of those who support Trump aren't racist or sexist isn't the same as saying Trump isn't racist or sexist. Plus, it's not like saying those who support Trump are horrible worked out too well for Clinton. Even if you believe that most of Trump's supporters are racist, that's not something you should explicitly say as a candidate.

Tweeting out anything right before the election that even implies that it is ok to vote for the opposition is wrong. Sanders is not that stupid.

Saying that it's okay to vote for the opposition =/= Saying that people who do aren't racist or sexist

Maybe if Hillary had learned the same thing and humbled herself, she would be president right now.

Why was it necessary for him to say that? Voters know what their intentions are and don't need a politician to tell them anything. It was just an odd thing to tweet right before any election especially from someone who never really conceded that they lost the primary.

I don't know, I don't live inside his head.  Why did Hillary call her opponents' supporters deplorable?

Maybe because a lot of them are deplorable? The past three years have demonstrated that a lot of them are and many people have woken up to that fact.

And that, my friend, is why you lose.

Democrats aren't winning anyone who votes based on Trump's racist ramblings, period. The House flipped in 2018 because voters in swing states rejected extremism and hate. If you think Sanders would win this racists that marched in Charlottesville you need to rethink that.