Colorado 2020 U.S. House Redistricting Discussion (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 01:59:15 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Colorado 2020 U.S. House Redistricting Discussion (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Colorado 2020 U.S. House Redistricting Discussion  (Read 26952 times)
AustralianSwingVoter
Atlas Politician
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,994
Australia


« on: January 13, 2020, 06:45:13 AM »

Colorado Amendments Y and Z both overwhelmingly passed in 2018, so the Democratic trifecta has no ability to use their control to influence redistricting.
Logged
AustralianSwingVoter
Atlas Politician
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,994
Australia


« Reply #1 on: January 13, 2020, 07:48:04 AM »

Can you provide a color key for your results? I wish I had the DRA color order memorized, but I don’t.

This is a very minor point, but Routt County (Steamboat Springs) is more Democratic than nearby counties and would pair well with the Boulder district rather than the primarily agricultural counties to its west. Rabbit Ears Pass connects it with the Front Range is warm weather.

First
Second
Third
Fourth
Fifth
Sixth
Seventh
Eighth
Logged
AustralianSwingVoter
Atlas Politician
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,994
Australia


« Reply #2 on: January 13, 2020, 06:28:15 PM »

https://davesredistricting.org/join/0e67ae47-147a-43bf-af1a-112973325418
4D-2C-2R map
Gives both sides something they'd want.  Majority-minority Denver seat and 2 other suburban seats have areas of Denver that make them safe D.  Boulder+Fort Collins seat safe D.  CO Springs and Eastern CO seats are safe R, and competitive seats in western CO and the southern suburbs of Denver.

Firstly, given it's an independent commission it doesn't matter what both sides want. Secondly, given Colorado has a Democratic trifecta, why would the Republicans ever get anything they want in redistricting? Thirdly, your "competitive" seats are R+7 (6th) and R+9 (5th) so really you've just drawn a 4-4 map, or a light Republican gerrymander.
Logged
AustralianSwingVoter
Atlas Politician
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,994
Australia


« Reply #3 on: January 13, 2020, 07:37:12 PM »

https://davesredistricting.org/join/0e67ae47-147a-43bf-af1a-112973325418
4D-2C-2R map
Gives both sides something they'd want.  Majority-minority Denver seat and 2 other suburban seats have areas of Denver that make them safe D.  Boulder+Fort Collins seat safe D.  CO Springs and Eastern CO seats are safe R, and competitive seats in western CO and the southern suburbs of Denver.

Firstly, given it's an independent commission it doesn't matter what both sides want. Secondly, given Colorado has a Democratic trifecta, why would the Republicans ever get anything they want in redistricting? Thirdly, your "competitive" seats are R+7 (6th) and R+9 (5th) so really you've just drawn a 4-4 map, or a light Republican gerrymander.
It's a bipartisan commission. 
It's as much of a bipartisan commission as Arizona has a "bipartisan commission"
Logged
AustralianSwingVoter
Atlas Politician
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,994
Australia


« Reply #4 on: January 13, 2020, 09:36:45 PM »

Colorado is yet another Democratic Trifecta to adopt a commission denying the Democrats the opportunity for more favourable maps. A clean 6-2 could very easily be drawn if the legislature still controlled redistricting. (In this example the 3rd is D+5 while the other Dem seats are all over D+8)

Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 12 queries.