Colorado 2020 U.S. House Redistricting Discussion
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 05:04:17 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Colorado 2020 U.S. House Redistricting Discussion
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 ... 21
Author Topic: Colorado 2020 U.S. House Redistricting Discussion  (Read 26888 times)
Stuart98
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,777
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.35, S: -5.83

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #325 on: September 03, 2021, 11:06:14 PM »

Experimental plan I came up with in response to the commission's new plan:



6th is made into a maj-min with substantial Hispanic and black populations, 4th is a Hispanic opportunity district that's majority minority by total population, 8th is one quarter hispanic and has weaker trends than most of the state.
Logged
Calthrina950
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,919
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #326 on: September 04, 2021, 09:35:08 AM »

Neguse is already fundraising off of it:



Boebert lost Garfield County to Diane Mitsch-Bush last year, if I'm not mistaken.
yep, she did

And not only did Mitsch-Bush win it, but she got a majority there. Certainly a humiliating result for Boebert to lose her home county, although she obviously carried her hometown of Rifle (Mitsch-Bush won thanks to a strong performance in Glenwood Springs). Mitsch-Bush did the best of the three major Democratic candidates in Garfield County, as Biden won it with a plurality and Hickenlooper lost it to Cory Gardner.
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,371
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #327 on: September 04, 2021, 09:38:01 AM »

Neguse is already fundraising off of it:



Boebert lost Garfield County to Diane Mitsch-Bush last year, if I'm not mistaken.
yep, she did

And not only did Mitsch-Bush win it, but she got a majority there. Certainly a humiliating result for Boebert to lose her home county, although she obviously carried her hometown of Rifle (Mitsch-Bush won thanks to a strong performance in Glenwood Springs). Mitsch-Bush did the best of the three major Democratic candidates in Garfield County, as Biden won it with a plurality and Hickenlooper lost it to Cory Gardner.
Interesting.
Two things as an aside.
I don't think someone losing their home county necessarily means too much, especially in this era of polarization up and increasingly farther down the ballot.
The other is, it's ironic that the gun rights activist who rises to the fore due to something related to Beto O'Rouke lives in a place called...Rifle. Lol.
I wonder how that place got its name.
Logged
Stuart98
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,777
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.35, S: -5.83

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #328 on: September 04, 2021, 10:07:14 AM »

Does she actually live in Rifle, or does she live in Silt (a town just east of Rifle)? Different Wikipedia pages disagree on this.
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,363


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #329 on: September 04, 2021, 12:00:26 PM »

I think Ken Buck actually lives in the new 8th but I would guess he runs in the 4th.

Either way from a non-partisan perspective it's absolutely abominable that Greeley ends up somehow in a Denver metro district while Fort Collins gets lumped in to a district with the plains. For that matter lumping in Loveland with Boulder and the NW quarter of the state is also pretty bad.

What's wrong with Loveland and Boulder? Most normal maps have a Larimer +Boulder district which would include Loveland?
Logged
Coastal Elitist
Tea Party Hater
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,252
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.71, S: 2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #330 on: September 04, 2021, 02:46:31 PM »

Wouldn't be surprised if this new version gets another big change next time. There are hundreds of comments on the commission website by people upset about slicing Fort Collins out of Larimer and sticking it with the rurals.
Logged
Oryxslayer
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,791


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #331 on: September 04, 2021, 04:57:48 PM »

Wouldn't be surprised if this new version gets another big change next time. There are hundreds of comments on the commission website by people upset about slicing Fort Collins out of Larimer and sticking it with the rurals.

Yeah that was a decision that just raised more questions then it answers. The simple solution would be to just cut Boulder instead and put more turf with the metro seats, but given how drastic  map a -> map b was, map b -> map c will likely be similar.
Logged
Calthrina950
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,919
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #332 on: September 04, 2021, 05:42:32 PM »

Neguse is already fundraising off of it:



Boebert lost Garfield County to Diane Mitsch-Bush last year, if I'm not mistaken.
yep, she did

And not only did Mitsch-Bush win it, but she got a majority there. Certainly a humiliating result for Boebert to lose her home county, although she obviously carried her hometown of Rifle (Mitsch-Bush won thanks to a strong performance in Glenwood Springs). Mitsch-Bush did the best of the three major Democratic candidates in Garfield County, as Biden won it with a plurality and Hickenlooper lost it to Cory Gardner.
Interesting.
Two things as an aside.
I don't think someone losing their home county necessarily means too much, especially in this era of polarization up and increasingly farther down the ballot.
The other is, it's ironic that the gun rights activist who rises to the fore due to something related to Beto O'Rouke lives in a place called...Rifle. Lol.
I wonder how that place got its name.

You do have a point. It doesn't necessarily mean much, but I think it does mean something that Boebert did worse in her home county than either Trump or Gardner. As for the second, you're right about that also. It's been about two years since Boebert first gained prominence by confronting O'Rourke at his rally in Denver.
Logged
💥💥 brandon bro (he/him/his)
peenie_weenie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,476
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #333 on: September 04, 2021, 07:58:50 PM »

I think Ken Buck actually lives in the new 8th but I would guess he runs in the 4th.

Either way from a non-partisan perspective it's absolutely abominable that Greeley ends up somehow in a Denver metro district while Fort Collins gets lumped in to a district with the plains. For that matter lumping in Loveland with Boulder and the NW quarter of the state is also pretty bad.

What's wrong with Loveland and Boulder? Most normal maps have a Larimer +Boulder district which would include Loveland?

The more offensive part is splitting Fort Collins and Loveland. Loveland is basically a less wealthy sister city to the neighboring destination/college town (think: Springfield Oregon). I get that there's a continuity issue that means that if you split Loveland and FoCo, Loveland has to go in with Boulder (although given that we've seen maps that give portions of western Boulder County to the third apparently this isn't a major priority) but culturally it's an awful fit, just as Fort Collins is for a district that includes the Northeast corner of the state (and Douglas County, somehow).

Oh well, I don't particularly care because this won't be the final map and if it was it would benefit my party. But it's pretty blatant to anyone who knows the Northern Front Range.
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,651
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #334 on: September 04, 2021, 08:13:08 PM »

The new map basically looks like an R dummymander where they are assuming Biden's #'s were a one-off and trying for a majority of the seats.
Logged
patzer
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,052
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -3.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #335 on: September 05, 2021, 04:26:25 PM »

So I thought I'd have a go at making another map, inspired by the latest commission one and trying to fix its flaws. Points to note here:

1) The obvious issue of the inclusion of Fort Collins in the eastern plains district: I thought the best solution to this would be to have a single district for all the northern towns, as a community of interest. Except Greeley, which needs to be in the Hispanic district.

2) The northern Hispanic district (numbered 8th on my map) is 44% Hispanic, reaching round to take in a few mostly-Hispanic precincts of Aurora. Southern Hispanic district is 26% Hispanic.

3) The data here is 2016 presidential. I didn't look at the partisan data until the map was finished, then had a look, and of course it turned out to be 7-1 in 2020 for Biden. However, when discussing competitiveness the Republicans are bound to be ambitious and look to reverse some of those trends. From this viewpoint, when looking at the 2016 data (2 Dem, 1 Rep, 5 swing) it seems fair and maximizes competitiveness. (Of course it could very easily go 8-0 in reality, but if it does do so that's indicative that the Republicans in the state have failed anyway)

4) One slight disadvantage of this map is how different many of the districts on it are to their current configurations. Boebert's pretty evenly split between the 3rd and 4th; Neguse between the 2nd and 3rd; Buck between the 2nd, 8th, 6th, and 7th; and Perlmutter between the 3rd, 7th, and 8th.

Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,651
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #336 on: September 05, 2021, 09:25:32 PM »

So I thought I'd have a go at making another map, inspired by the latest commission one and trying to fix its flaws. Points to note here:

1) The obvious issue of the inclusion of Fort Collins in the eastern plains district: I thought the best solution to this would be to have a single district for all the northern towns, as a community of interest. Except Greeley, which needs to be in the Hispanic district.

2) The northern Hispanic district (numbered 8th on my map) is 44% Hispanic, reaching round to take in a few mostly-Hispanic precincts of Aurora. Southern Hispanic district is 26% Hispanic.

3) The data here is 2016 presidential. I didn't look at the partisan data until the map was finished, then had a look, and of course it turned out to be 7-1 in 2020 for Biden. However, when discussing competitiveness the Republicans are bound to be ambitious and look to reverse some of those trends. From this viewpoint, when looking at the 2016 data (2 Dem, 1 Rep, 5 swing) it seems fair and maximizes competitiveness. (Of course it could very easily go 8-0 in reality, but if it does do so that's indicative that the Republicans in the state have failed anyway)

4) One slight disadvantage of this map is how different many of the districts on it are to their current configurations. Boebert's pretty evenly split between the 3rd and 4th; Neguse between the 2nd and 3rd; Buck between the 2nd, 8th, 6th, and 7th; and Perlmutter between the 3rd, 7th, and 8th.



This map just looks like a gerrymander with the spokes into Denver/Boulder metro.  Weirdly, it works out to be something closer to an R gerrymander despite the look, because they hold their 3 and can contest both 8 and 6 (depending on how much weight you put on Biden #'s of course).
Logged
patzer
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,052
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -3.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #337 on: September 05, 2021, 11:53:16 PM »

This map just looks like a gerrymander with the spokes into Denver/Boulder metro.  Weirdly, it works out to be something closer to an R gerrymander despite the look, because they hold their 3 and can contest both 8 and 6 (depending on how much weight you put on Biden #'s of course).

Weird thing is that I put no thought of gerrymandering at all into it- it just ended up being a natural result of having one southern Hispanic district, one northern cities district, and one northern Hispanic district, in addition to the existing east and west ones.

Five districts with a border on the edge of Colorado and more inevitably go into the Denver area.

And yeah, I wouldn't really call it a gerrymander until we know how much trends stick. It's just volatile.
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,371
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #338 on: September 06, 2021, 02:09:48 AM »

What would a hardcore 5R-3D under 2020 figures look like?
Logged
patzer
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,052
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -3.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #339 on: September 06, 2021, 07:53:04 AM »

What would a hardcore 5R-3D under 2020 figures look like?

Best you can do is a dummymander. Each red district is at least Trump +5:



(you could get it up to Trump +6 by carving into El Paso County, but not beyond)
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,371
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #340 on: September 06, 2021, 08:09:32 AM »

What would a hardcore 5R-3D under 2020 figures look like?

Best you can do is a dummymander. Each red district is at least Trump +5:



(you could get it up to Trump +6 by carving into El Paso County, but not beyond)
Lol, at least this map would hold up better than the map GA Dems passed in 1992.
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,363


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #341 on: September 06, 2021, 11:59:47 PM »



Munching on popcorn.
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,371
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #342 on: September 07, 2021, 12:04:20 AM »



Munching on popcorn.
Best reality show ever from the Rockies. Change my mind.
Logged
OBD
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,570
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -5.16, S: -6.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #343 on: September 07, 2021, 09:41:37 AM »



Munching on popcorn.
Please don't switch districts lmao
Logged
BoiseBoy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 959
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.05, S: -1.13

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #344 on: September 13, 2021, 11:05:26 AM »

State house and senate maps are due to be released today.
Logged
BoiseBoy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 959
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.05, S: -1.13

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #345 on: September 13, 2021, 01:24:45 PM »

UPDATE: Here are the state senate and house maps as proposed by redistricting staff

Senate
https://coleg.maps.arcgis.com/apps/View/index.html?appid=6ccdcadefab24cd38999c94b12255e2f

House
https://coleg.maps.arcgis.com/apps/View/index.html?appid=7162477c2fa64ecab17a61aa35daf896
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,371
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #346 on: September 13, 2021, 01:29:31 PM »

Wow, Senate Districts 3 and 8 together have a majority of the state's land area.
Logged
BoiseBoy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 959
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.05, S: -1.13

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #347 on: September 13, 2021, 01:36:53 PM »

Here are the maps, colored by 2020 numbers:

Senate


House
Logged
Roll Roons
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,037
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #348 on: September 13, 2021, 01:38:59 PM »

Wow, geography sucks for Colorado Republicans.
Logged
Thunder98 🇮🇱 🤝 🇵🇸
Thunder98
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,574
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #349 on: September 14, 2021, 07:44:53 PM »
« Edited: September 14, 2021, 07:47:54 PM by Thunder98 »



I made a new 7-1 D map with the new 2020 census data. (2020 Prez data)

https://davesredistricting.org/join/c5d1c62e-ec17-4241-8e42-fd05a35573ea



Logged
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 ... 21  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.059 seconds with 11 queries.