2020 Oregon Redistricting
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 04:44:38 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  2020 Oregon Redistricting
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 ... 18
Author Topic: 2020 Oregon Redistricting  (Read 21632 times)
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,433
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: May 10, 2020, 09:12:46 PM »

I redid the 3rd, 1st, and 6th. Now the new CD is D+10, pretty much safe D.
I adopted suggestion 1.
I still prefer cutting into Multnomah twice over splitting Washington so I decided instead to feed the 6th CD into western Downtown Portland.

"5. Having the 5th cut into Springfield is better than it crossing the river in Lane." That something I cannot do. I didn't hand-pick precincts in Lane County just to turn OR-04 into a Trump district due to it having more Trump-voting territory in northern Lane. (I assume that you meant to type 6th there instead of 5th)

Nice. I really like what you did. This should be a pretty safe 5-1 and it doesn't cross the Cascades. I wish there were better ties between the northern and southern parts of the 5th, but that really isn't possible without cutting Washington.
Thanks for the kind words. This is what happens you hand-pick precincts. In the 2nd's share of Jackson for instance there are 0 Clinton precincts. And in the 6th's share of Lane there are only 3 Clinton precincts.
Of course. However, I had to edit my earlier comment because it looks like the 5th and 6th districts are very competitive, and any map with 4+ safe D seats has to split Washington. The general design is good, but I think you'll have to do that if you want 5 Clinton+5 or higher seats.
You wind up hitting a wall past a certain point. 4 safe D seats or heavily respecting CoI - two things you have to choose between.
The map is optimized for safety while following CoI to a high degree. But one could tear up the CoI and easily get a safe 5-1, as Tack's map illustrates.

I agree. My concern is that in your map, the 5th isn't particularly safe, leaving the possibility of a 3-3 map in a R wave. Understandably, the 4th is always going to be a tossup unless you really start violating COIs.
One could reverse the placing of Clatsop in the 1st. Before then it was D+1.
Logged
Nyvin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,650
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: May 10, 2020, 09:29:42 PM »





https://davesredistricting.org/join/eb7e8ebd-cec8-47f4-99cc-d4f835b244aa

Here's a wacky new 4D-2R map with only 6 county splits.   I kinda like the northwest coast district actually.   It even keeps Salem and Eugene in different districts.  
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,354


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: May 10, 2020, 09:31:19 PM »

Oregon and IL D trifectas will be under much pressure to minimize R seats due to the likely GOP Gerrymanders in FL, GA and TX.
Logged
Starry Eyed Jagaloon
Blairite
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,853
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: May 10, 2020, 09:39:22 PM »

My Portland metro quad-cut map:



OR-01: West Portland, Beaverton, Hillsboro, Astoria. Safe D (Bonamici).
OR-02: Northeast Portland, Gresham, Sandy. Safe D (Blumenauer).
OR-03: Southeast Portland, Oregon City, Salem. Safe D (Schrader).
OR-04: Tigard, Wilsonville, Albany, Corvallis. Safe D (Open).
OR-05: Eugene, Roseburg, Coos Bay, Medford. Likely D (DeFazio).
OR-06: Bend, Klamath Falls, Grants Pass, Hermiston. Safe R (Walden).
Logged
Mr.Phips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,545


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: May 11, 2020, 09:47:48 AM »

The key is unpacking the 3rd district.  That district should get about eight points more Dem in order to give some more of downtown Portland to the 5th and new 6th districts.
Logged
Sol
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,142
Bosnia and Herzegovina


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: May 11, 2020, 11:47:58 AM »

I've been playing around with a Fair Map, and man, gaining a district isn't good for Democrats in that scenario. You basically end up with a 3-3 map, with two of the Republican seats as leaners (though I'm not too clear on the new 6th's politics outside of 2016). Sucks as DeFazio is one of the best members of Congress--don't know how winnable the 6th is for him. I guess I could put Ashland in the 6th instead of Medford area towns, but I don't think Ashland is super well connected to the district.
Logged
Oryxslayer
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,790


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: May 11, 2020, 12:10:42 PM »

Something like this of course is the rational option - 4 Safe D 2 Safe R.



But of Course there are plenty of ways to go for 5 dem seats of varying hues.





Note that these are older maps with the 2016 data, but I'm just posting them to get the general shapes out there, so it's fine.
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,672
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: May 11, 2020, 12:23:11 PM »

Is this a pure Dem free-for-all?  Most Western states have either fully independent commissions or strict rules now.  Is OR an exception?
Logged
Mr.Phips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,545


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: May 11, 2020, 12:25:56 PM »

Is this a pure Dem free-for-all?  Most Western states have either fully independent commissions or strict rules now.  Is OR an exception?

There is a rule that there must be roads linking all of a district.
Logged
Zaybay
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,076
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.25, S: -6.50

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: May 11, 2020, 02:13:23 PM »

Is this a pure Dem free-for-all?  Most Western states have either fully independent commissions or strict rules now.  Is OR an exception?

There are safeguards:

-Districts must be contiguous.
-Districts must "utilize existing geographic or political boundaries."
-Districts should not "divide communities of common interest."
-Districts should "be connected by transportation links."
-Districts "must not be drawn for the purpose of favoring a political party, incumbent or other person.

Otherwise, the Dems can draw whatever they want.
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,672
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: May 11, 2020, 03:13:47 PM »

Is this a pure Dem free-for-all?  Most Western states have either fully independent commissions or strict rules now.  Is OR an exception?

There are safeguards:

-Districts must be contiguous.
-Districts must "utilize existing geographic or political boundaries."
-Districts should not "divide communities of common interest."
-Districts should "be connected by transportation links."
-Districts "must not be drawn for the purpose of favoring a political party, incumbent or other person.

Otherwise, the Dems can draw whatever they want.

OK, so this sounds like a mildly regulated regime, think KY on the other side.
Logged
Nyvin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,650
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: May 11, 2020, 04:37:25 PM »

Is this a pure Dem free-for-all?  Most Western states have either fully independent commissions or strict rules now.  Is OR an exception?

There are safeguards:

-Districts must be contiguous.
-Districts must "utilize existing geographic or political boundaries."
-Districts should not "divide communities of common interest."
-Districts should "be connected by transportation links."
-Districts "must not be drawn for the purpose of favoring a political party, incumbent or other person.

Otherwise, the Dems can draw whatever they want.

Yeah, I know the Willamette River and Cascade Mountains are two geographic boundaries that have been established that should be respected when possible.

After that county splits seem to be the biggest thing - The current map only has 4.
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,433
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: May 11, 2020, 08:03:57 PM »

how certain is OR gaining a sixth district?
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,354


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: May 11, 2020, 08:06:57 PM »


If it still had 5 districts it would have like 840k people per district so almost certainly gaining.
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,433
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: May 11, 2020, 08:25:24 PM »


If it still had 5 districts it would have like 840k people per district so almost certainly gaining.
So I assume OR-6 is about the 427th or so seat that is awarded and thus out of the edge zone?
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,354


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: May 11, 2020, 08:28:47 PM »


If it still had 5 districts it would have like 840k people per district so almost certainly gaining.
So I assume OR-6 is about the 427th or so seat that is awarded and thus out of the edge zone?

Yeah most likely.
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,433
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: May 11, 2020, 08:29:37 PM »


If it still had 5 districts it would have like 840k people per district so almost certainly gaining.
So I assume OR-6 is about the 427th or so seat that is awarded and thus out of the edge zone?

Yeah most likely.
If Oregon somehow missed out on a seat AGAIN, then what would the map look like?
Logged
Starry Eyed Jagaloon
Blairite
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,853
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: May 11, 2020, 09:10:51 PM »


If it still had 5 districts it would have like 840k people per district so almost certainly gaining.
So I assume OR-6 is about the 427th or so seat that is awarded and thus out of the edge zone?

Yeah most likely.
If Oregon somehow missed out on a seat AGAIN, then what would the map look like?

The current one with the 3 Portland metro districts bit smaller and the 2 downstate seats a bit larger. Although I really doubt Oregon doesn't get a 6th district .
Logged
OBD
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,580
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -5.16, S: -6.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: May 12, 2020, 11:45:05 AM »

https://davesredistricting.org/join/5d428c83-7e6f-406a-91dc-914117e7f236
I'd say this map is roughly as far as Dems can go with a gerrymander without totally baconing the map (on a related note, I think this map's version of cracking Portland is the best way to get a solid 4-1-1 on less extreme gerrymanders - either that or creating a coastal district with a tail into Portland). While it has a lot of county splits and violates the 18-county eastern group, all non-4th D districts are at least Clinton +14 (and are probably trending blue), and the 4th itself is around Clinton +11, which is probably the best Dems can do in the 4th without extending it into Benton County.


https://davesredistricting.org/join/194f35a9-0cbc-4280-97bc-52b1f11da0d9
Here's what a coast-based gerrymander can look like.
Logged
Oryxslayer
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,790


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: May 13, 2020, 08:27:15 AM »

Here's a rather clean 5-1 map born this morning from the idea of a different Portland cut. It can even get more friendlier for Dems by sending Schrader's seat into Portland, but I desired to just show off how much you can still do with just a single cut in Portland. The 4th has to take in more Republican territory than would be preferable for road connections.



OR01: 54/34 Clinton, D+7.6
OR02: 62.5/27.5 Trump, R+18.4
OR03: 59/31 Clinton, D+14.25
OR04: 51/38 Clinton, D+6.75
OR05: 48/40 Clinton, D+2
OR06: 60/30.5 Clinton, D+14.6
Logged
Starry Eyed Jagaloon
Blairite
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,853
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: May 13, 2020, 01:15:03 PM »

Oryx, that map is probably illegal. Under the current law, I don't think you can get away with crossing the cascades more than once and the 3rd does some weird COI pairings and crosses the Willamette. I think OR Dems are more likely to pursue 4-1-1, to be honest.
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,354


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #46 on: May 21, 2020, 08:45:47 PM »

https://www.oregonlive.com/news/2020/05/independent-redistricting-commission-supporters-launch-oregon-signature-gathering-campaign.html

Btw slight chance it makes the ballot
Logged
Oryxslayer
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,790


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #47 on: May 21, 2020, 10:26:47 PM »

Just posting that I accidentally deleted my response to this post.


It was

"Oh I know that probably half the maps in this thread are illegal. I'm just curious what was possible."
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,354


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #48 on: May 22, 2020, 06:16:27 PM »

Legitimate question
Would Schrader even want the cut into excess portland?
Thats 120k of the strongest leftists possible
Logged
Starry Eyed Jagaloon
Blairite
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,853
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #49 on: May 22, 2020, 06:42:25 PM »

Legitimate question
Would Schrader even want the cut into excess portland?
Thats 120k of the strongest leftists possible

He'd probably be okay if he keeps all of Marion and most of Clackamas. I suppose he could take Gresham instead although the margins out there are weaker.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 ... 18  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.053 seconds with 13 queries.