Why did the northeast swing so much between 1956 and 1960?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 03:08:45 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Why did the northeast swing so much between 1956 and 1960?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why did the northeast swing so much between 1956 and 1960?  (Read 1549 times)
buritobr
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,645


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 29, 2019, 08:26:16 AM »

In 1956, the ticket Eisenhower-Nixon won a landslide, and the northeast was their strongest region. In New York, the margin was bigger than 20 points.
In 1960, JFK defeated Nixon and the northeast was the most democratic region.

How could a region change so much in only 4 years? Only because JFK was northeastern?
Logged
TDAS04
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,522
Bhutan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 29, 2019, 10:31:01 AM »
« Edited: December 29, 2019, 10:49:18 AM by TDAS04 »

Kennedy was a Northeasterner and a Catholic.  In 1956, Catholics split their votes between Eisenhower and Stevenson, possibly even supporting Ike with a slight majority.  In 1960, over 80% voted for one of their own, JFK.
Logged
Arbitrage1980
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 770
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 29, 2019, 06:31:50 PM »

-Eisenhower was a war hero, so he was able to transcend partisan affiliation.
-JFK was a handsome charismatic Northeasterner and Catholic.
-Recession in 1958 hurt the GOP.
-The election was nonetheless close because JFK was a lightweight with no substance.
Logged
buritobr
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,645


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 30, 2019, 03:11:58 PM »

What is the % of the catholics in the northeastern population?
Logged
brucejoel99
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,649
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: December 30, 2019, 05:05:49 PM »

Because JFK.
Logged
TheElectoralBoobyPrize
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,525


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 03, 2020, 12:13:27 PM »
« Edited: January 03, 2020, 12:37:57 PM by TheElectoralBoobyPrize »

Wonder if Stevenson underperformed in the region 1952/1956 due to having a southern running mate...(yes, that didn't stop JFK, but JFK was an actual northeasterner unlike Stevenson and Texas isn't Tennessee/Georgia Alabama).

And it's not like Nixon did terrible in the region.
Logged
Sumner 1868
tara gilesbie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,058
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: January 03, 2020, 10:48:36 PM »

Kennedy was a Northeasterner and a Catholic.  In 1956, Catholics split their votes between Eisenhower and Stevenson, possibly even supporting Ike with a slight majority.  In 1960, over 80% voted for one of their own, JFK.

1956 was the only time between 1928 and 1984 that Androscoggin County, Maine voted Republican.
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderators
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,123
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: January 04, 2020, 12:57:48 AM »

1960 emphasizes the decline in voting power for WASP Yankees as a force that could dictate the outcomes of the NE states (except for ME, NH and VT) and also the decline in the GOP performance with that group beginning to take hold. Though slight, the GOP under performed among this group relative to their 1948 numbers and remember 1948 was considered to be an under performance itself. Of course the bottom would fall out in 1964 for this group and though the GOP would recover somewhat in 1968, Nixon was down massively in for example the UES relative to 1960, which in turn was a week performance compared to 1948.

Republicans had made massive gains among middle class Irish/Italian/Germans during the 1950's under Ike (a process that really began to manifest in 1940) and in the grand scheme of things it was among these voters that Nixon would win in 1968, but 1960 was an reversion of the trends back to the old Catholic Democrat versus Protestant Republican one that had existed for a century, the difference between that being a winning coalition in the past and a losing one in 1960 is down to the relative vote shares in 1960. It should also be noted that some of these middle class Catholic precincts actually trended to Goldwater, though after 1960 that wouldn't be hard to accomplish.

Of great importance was the lesson that Republicans drew from both 1948 and 1960, as well as the disappointment with the African-American numbers in 1956. The inability to reconstruct the old school GOP coalition of Yankees, blacks and just enough of everyone else to win in a post New Deal era, is what helped encourage the GOP to seek out a newer more reliable base that could actually deliver results. This is essentially the case that Kevin Phillips made, paraphrasing of course: "The NE won't deliver, not even Rocky can win a majority of the black vote, focus on the South and the West and let the Democrats have the old pastures". Also, "any subsequent success in places like New York will be driven by Irish/Italians/Germans, voting in opposition to the interests of WASP elitists (think Staten Island's voting behavior), not the other way around".

Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,680
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: January 30, 2020, 12:35:52 AM »

What is the % of the catholics in the northeastern population?

in the late 50s,  would have been between at least a quarter of the population in every northeastern state, aside from possibly Vermont and Maine.   RI and possibly Mass. would have been majority Catholic.  The post-WW2 era was the high point of Catholicism's mainstream influence in American culture.
Logged
YE
Modadmin
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,722


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: February 02, 2020, 12:11:55 AM »

For those saying JFK, how does that explain the massive landslides in the region during the 1958 recession?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.034 seconds with 11 queries.