What if 'Cleggmania' had materialized?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 01:54:07 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  International What-ifs (Moderator: Dereich)
  What if 'Cleggmania' had materialized?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: What if 'Cleggmania' had materialized?  (Read 3085 times)
brucejoel99
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,720
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 29, 2019, 05:30:26 AM »

Let's say that Nick Clegg doesn't overextend himself & the surge in support for the Lib Dems, which had been triggered by his strong performance in the first televised debate, managed to stick around?

I would presume (depending on the final results & the seat counts thereof) that Brown would quit very soon after the election, if not immediately so. Would the Lib Dems manage to perform well enough, in terms of seats, that Clegg himself gets invited by the Queen to form a government?
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 20, 2020, 01:37:10 AM »

Depends on what you mean by 'materialised'. The biggest Lib Dem lead, in percentage terms, was 3% over the Conservatives by YouGov on 19-20 April (Lib 34, Con 31, Lab 26). Seat wise, the Electoral Calculus projector gives Lab 238, Con 226, Lib 150, SNP 7, PC 4, Oth 3.

If we're assuming those seat numbers, then it would've been a Liberal Democrat choice of government.  They may have been more inclined to discuss with Labour than they were in real life, due to them being the largest party and being able to form a stable government together (unlike the requiring support from the SNP+Plaid to get a bare working majority).

Gordon Brown was a major stumbling block to a Labour-Lib Dem deal in real life, he may have been more reluctant to resign had Labour been the largest party. I'd imagine, however, that a Labour-Lib Dem coalition would've emerged.
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 16, 2020, 12:17:24 PM »

Depends on what you mean by 'materialised'. The biggest Lib Dem lead, in percentage terms, was 3% over the Conservatives by YouGov on 19-20 April (Lib 34, Con 31, Lab 26). Seat wise, the Electoral Calculus projector gives Lab 238, Con 226, Lib 150, SNP 7, PC 4, Oth 3.

If we're assuming those seat numbers, then it would've been a Liberal Democrat choice of government.  They may have been more inclined to discuss with Labour than they were in real life, due to them being the largest party and being able to form a stable government together (unlike the requiring support from the SNP+Plaid to get a bare working majority).

Gordon Brown was a major stumbling block to a Labour-Lib Dem deal in real life, he may have been more reluctant to resign had Labour been the largest party. I'd imagine, however, that a Labour-Lib Dem coalition would've emerged.

Is there a chance that Clegg could actually be in a good enough position to be made Prime Minister? I mean, he could pick whoever he wanted and switch over if he ever felt like it. That’s a pretty strong position to be in.

One thing I didn’t realize is just how equally spread the Lib Dem votes are - to get over the other two parties, they have to hit almost 40% and beat them by 10%+. No wonder they want the system reformed!
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 13 queries.