Why did HW Bush underperform in California in 1988? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 11:27:32 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Why did HW Bush underperform in California in 1988? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why did HW Bush underperform in California in 1988?  (Read 1353 times)
Arbitrage1980
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 770
« on: December 27, 2019, 06:57:50 PM »

Yes, California is Reagan's home state, but the drop from 1984 to 1988 was pretty significant. Was Dukakis a good fit for California or something else happened?
Logged
Arbitrage1980
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 770
« Reply #1 on: December 28, 2019, 01:08:10 AM »
« Edited: December 28, 2019, 01:12:36 AM by Arbitrage1980 »

Reagan was a cali native and also the hispanic population in Cali was growing since the 1980s due to immigration from across the border. The biggest switches were the future super liberal region of the bay area.

Yes, SF Bay Area and LA County turned decisively from Regan to Dukakis. Not sure if it was because Reagan was personally popular there or because Dukakis was a great cultural fit.

Demographics is destiny and the #1 reason why Dems have done well in presidential elections since 1992. Why do you think Dems want to import as many immigrans as freaking possible?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 12 queries.