Who were the key swing voters from election to election?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 10:41:47 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Who were the key swing voters from election to election?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Who were the key swing voters from election to election?  (Read 588 times)
Orser67
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,946
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 24, 2019, 05:27:18 PM »

The longer form of the question I'm asking: which were the key group(s) that swung from one party to another compared to the previous election? They can either be the groups that swung most dramatically, or the group whose swing (regardless of size) had the greatest impact on the election. This will almost certainly be somewhat subjective, but I still think it's worth thinking about.

In 2016, one of the key groups that swung were everyone's favorite Atlas topic: non-college whites with conservative views on racial issues and moderate-to-liberal views on economic issues.

Romney had mostly across-the-board gains compared to 2008, but two groups that stand out to me are high income voters (Obama won voters making >$200k 52-46 in 2008 but lost voters making >$250k 42-55 in 2012) and whites 18-29 (Obama won these voters 54-44 in 2008 but lost them 44-51 in 2012). The former group's swing certainly plays into the idea that a major theme of the election was a sort of low-key class warfare, as expressed by Romney's famous quote of the "47%".
 
Obama reached all kinds of high-water marks in 2008, but his key pick-ups for the "Obama coalition" were young and/or non-white voters, especially in urban areas.

In 2004, the prototypical Gore-Bush voter was the "soccer mom" concerned about national security issues. Bush also made impressive improvements with Hispanic voters, as the Democratic margin fell from 27 points to 11 points.

In 2000, we have to deal with the issue of Perot's former voters returning to the two major parties; as one might expect, Bush made huge gains with self-identified independents and Republicans. Regionally, the South was the biggest difference, as it went from a rough tie in the popular vote to 13-point Republican victory; in the electoral vote, it went from a rough tie to a Republican sweep as Republicans picked up FL and the interior South. Republicans also gained a lot of ground with Hispanics (the Democratic margin fell from 50 points to 27 points).

Any agreements, disagreements, or corrections? All of the data I cited comes from Wikipedia, which is cited to either CNN Exit Polls or the Roper Center.
Logged
darklordoftech
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,440
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 24, 2019, 05:36:27 PM »

2000: Floridans

2004: People worried about terrorism

2008: People hurt by the recession
Logged
Orser67
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,946
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 24, 2019, 08:39:34 PM »

For 2012, this Pew article points out that the prototypical member of Obama's worst category among younger voters (compared to 2008) would be pretty similar to the stereotypical Bernie 2020 voter: an independent white man who didn't graduate from college. Also, Romney significantly improved on McCain's margin in rural areas, going from an 8-point victory to a 24-point victory.
 
It's not completely on-topic, but this struck me as really interesting in terms of how Obama won:

Quote
Exit polls told a stunning story. The majority of voters preferred Romney’s visions, values, and leadership. But he had clearly failed to address the problem that Romney’s own family worried about from the start. Obama beat Romney by an astonishing 81 to 18 percent margin on the question of which candidate “cares about people like me.’’
Logged
SingingAnalyst
mathstatman
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,637
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 26, 2019, 08:55:58 AM »

Excellent summary.

In 2012 Obama won 81-18 for "cares about people like me". I suspect that was a significant share of the electorate, as Romney was well-respected and Obama's negatives were pretty high among conservatives. It probably made the difference.

An example of a voter group that did not make a difference was in 2008: McCain trounced Obama 86-13 among those who cited "terrorism" as a top concern-- but that was just 7% of the electorate.

2000? Ironically, Gore did somewhat better in FL than expected based on Clinton's '96 and Kerry's '04 performance; had Gore won FL and the election, FL would have been seen as a key "swing state" despite its relative inelasticity. I think the interior South and Appalachia swinging en masse from Clinton to Bush is much more significant: who would have predicted that WV, which went for Clinton by 14.3 in '96, would vote GOP in every subsequent election?
Logged
Orser67
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,946
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: December 26, 2019, 02:55:50 PM »

2000? Ironically, Gore did somewhat better in FL than expected based on Clinton's '96 and Kerry's '04 performance

Yeah, it's interesting that FL was actually in the bottom quartile of states in terms of Republican improvement between Dole and Bush, and was part of the region where Bush improved the least. His improvements were concentrated in both the interior South and the interior West, and he improved the least along the East Coast and the West Coast.

By the average of each the states in each census subregion, Bush improved on Dole by:

West South Central: 12.4%
Mountain: 10.5%
West North Central: 9.7%
East South Central: 9.4%
East North Central: 8.2%
New England: 7.5%
Pacific: 6.4%
Mid-Atlantic: 5.2%
South Atlantic: 5.1%
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,650
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 02, 2020, 07:35:55 PM »

2000? Ironically, Gore did somewhat better in FL than expected based on Clinton's '96 and Kerry's '04 performance

Yeah, it's interesting that FL was actually in the bottom quartile of states in terms of Republican improvement between Dole and Bush, and was part of the region where Bush improved the least. His improvements were concentrated in both the interior South and the interior West, and he improved the least along the East Coast and the West Coast.

By the average of each the states in each census subregion, Bush improved on Dole by:

West South Central: 12.4%
Mountain: 10.5%
West North Central: 9.7%
East South Central: 9.4%
East North Central: 8.2%
New England: 7.5%
Pacific: 6.4%
Mid-Atlantic: 5.2%
South Atlantic: 5.1%

It's also ironic that Florida hasn't been anywhere close to the deciding state in any election since, and that it went back to being significantly right of the nation.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 12 queries.