Dukakis's 272 strategy. (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 11:58:35 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Dukakis's 272 strategy. (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Dukakis's 272 strategy.  (Read 2020 times)
sg0508
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,058
United States


« on: December 22, 2019, 08:19:06 PM »

CBS "the 18 state strategy".  The problem was, once OH was gone (and they mentioned this was the biggest concern early), there was practically no way to make up for those chunk of EVs if Bentsen didn't somehow help them to take TX.
Logged
sg0508
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,058
United States


« Reply #1 on: December 22, 2019, 08:19:56 PM »

Ironically, and many forget this, but Dukakis came VERY close to making '88 a horse race in the Electoral College. Had he taken CA, PA, IL and MD, he was right there.
Logged
sg0508
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,058
United States


« Reply #2 on: December 22, 2019, 08:47:03 PM »

Ironically, and many forget this, but Dukakis came VERY close to making '88 a horse race in the Electoral College. Had he taken CA, PA, IL and MD, he was right there.

Even PA and IL, which he came very close to winning, would have already made the race much closer than many give it credit to being. The closeness of several states is like Carter in his second election in that regard
And those were likely four "Willie Horton" states that he threw away as a result of the furlough disaster.  Maybe not CA since that was the "final gift from Reagan", but definitely the other three.
Logged
sg0508
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,058
United States


« Reply #3 on: December 22, 2019, 09:43:54 PM »

Ironically, and many forget this, but Dukakis came VERY close to making '88 a horse race in the Electoral College. Had he taken CA, PA, IL and MD, he was right there.
Two big unknowns (assuming Reagan wasn't a lame duck from the state) - 1) The impact of the law & order vote in the suburbs that propelled Bush in many states 2) The "no show" effect since the race was over by the time CA was called.  Who didn't bother showing and in what #s? It's very hard to tell.

Even PA and IL, which he came very close to winning, would have already made the race much closer than many give it credit to being. The closeness of several states is like Carter in his second election in that regard
And those were likely four "Willie Horton" states that he threw away as a result of the furlough disaster.  Maybe not CA since that was the "final gift from Reagan", but definitely the other three.

Even with CA he only lost it by three points. So even with a popular incumbent, Bush barley won it. Take away Reagan, and Dukakis would have easily won it in my mind
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 12 queries.