UK General Discussion:The Rt. Hon Alex Boris de Pfeffel Johnson, Populist Hero (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 08:30:43 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  UK General Discussion:The Rt. Hon Alex Boris de Pfeffel Johnson, Populist Hero (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: What should the title of this thread be
#1
BomaJority
 
#2
Tsar Boris Good Enough
 
#3
This Benighted Plot
 
#4
King Boris I
 
#5
The Right Honourable Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson, Populist Hero
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 37

Author Topic: UK General Discussion:The Rt. Hon Alex Boris de Pfeffel Johnson, Populist Hero  (Read 287844 times)
JimJamUK
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 878
United Kingdom


« on: January 19, 2022, 12:39:51 PM »

Why is the 2019 intake so utterly chaotic- compared to say the Labour 97 of Tory 2010 intake?
But is it really? I mean, the 2010 intake included Louise Bagshawe Mensch!
Logged
JimJamUK
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 878
United Kingdom


« Reply #1 on: June 06, 2022, 05:46:56 PM »

My unpopular take is that this isn’t necessarily a bad thing for the Conservatives. Boris can limp on but he is damaged. A few more months of cost of living, poor polling and by-election defeats can lead to 30 MPs switching sides and getting rid of him. If I was wanting to be the next Conservative leader I would want him to last a while longer so he absorbs a lot of the public hate and then the new leader can take over as the economy gets better (or stays bad, which at worst makes no difference from getting rid of him now). A new leader in 2023 would then give them a bit of time to define themselves and move on from Boris. The counter argument is that the longer Boris stays the more damage he does to the Conservative brand (just look at how long the damage from Blair, Brown, Miliband and Corbyn’s leadership lasted in some form or other), and his ability to make poor decisions will damage whoever succeeds him.
Logged
JimJamUK
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 878
United Kingdom


« Reply #2 on: July 01, 2022, 06:08:20 PM »

He seems to have been appointed envoy to the Red Wall by the Lobby and broadcasters. Not sure why!
He's from Gateshead, dontcha know.
Privately educated of course, not that it’s done his analysis any good.
Logged
JimJamUK
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 878
United Kingdom


« Reply #3 on: July 05, 2022, 06:53:55 PM »

Boris briefing that they’re going for deficit financed tax cuts now Rishi’s gone.
Logged
JimJamUK
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 878
United Kingdom


« Reply #4 on: August 07, 2022, 08:22:16 AM »

Why don’t she just keep Priti Patel? Patel seems to me to deliver everything Conservative Home Secretary need to deliver, while having the added benefit of still being too unpopular to being a threat to her PM. Yes she not very competent, but mostly her job is to make the Guardian crowd rage against her and she seems to be great at that.
Patel’s unpopularity in fairly widespread. Obviously ‘progressives’ don’t like her, but she isn’t very popular among social conservatives/the general public either (perception of illegal immigration still not being stopped, crime out of control etc). She’s also just not a very likeable person. Theresa May did a much better job from a public relations point of view.
Logged
JimJamUK
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 878
United Kingdom


« Reply #5 on: August 19, 2022, 03:31:07 PM »

The newest YouGov poll has Labour ahead by 15%. Less than a month ago they found a (semi) shock poll of Labour’s lead falling to only 1% (which was not repeated by other pollsters afterwards). They do seem to bounce around a lot these days having some of the biggest and smallest Labour leads at various times.
Logged
JimJamUK
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 878
United Kingdom


« Reply #6 on: August 20, 2022, 02:43:39 PM »

Given that the current Opinium methodology is geared towards stability and is as much a projection as a snapshot in time, that’s a surprisingly large Labour lead.
Logged
JimJamUK
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 878
United Kingdom


« Reply #7 on: August 21, 2022, 05:12:17 PM »

If you ever wanted a good example of how the British press live in an alternate universe (and which is probably increasingly harmful to the long-term interests of the Conservative Party), look no further than tomorrows Express headline “VOTERS WONT FORGIVE RAIL STRIKE BETRAYAL”. They’re talking about something of substance like the governments response or the actions or the train operators/unions, right? Nope, it’s the Labour Party which is the problem. Is any normal, persuadable voter obsessing over the Labour Party’s lack of opposition (or frankly opinion) to the rail strikes, probably not. Are the aforementioned voters a lot more concerned about finding a resolution and by extension the actions of relevant actors, probably. Are papers like the Express doing anything to push the government towards a better actual outcome, no.
Logged
JimJamUK
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 878
United Kingdom


« Reply #8 on: August 25, 2022, 01:41:36 PM »

Labour is in a relatively worse position than it has traditionally performed in the places that trended Conservative in 2017/2019, but is in a relatively better position than it was in 2019 (the comparison to 2017 will be a bit more spotty). Muh Trends are neither inevitable nor completely reversed, and they will have changed yet again by 2024.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 12 queries.