McSally Underperforming Trump, Again
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 20, 2024, 07:13:54 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 Senate & House Election Polls
  McSally Underperforming Trump, Again
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: McSally Underperforming Trump, Again  (Read 2188 times)
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,516
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: December 16, 2019, 03:40:37 PM »

2016, McCain was on the ballot, that's why McSally has run for 2 Senate seats; consequently,  AZ, TX and GA are no longer Safe R states due to Latinos and AA
Logged
jamestroll
jamespol
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,519


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: December 16, 2019, 03:51:09 PM »
« Edited: December 16, 2019, 05:15:10 PM by jimmie »

Remember there are people who strongly believe that because 2016 had every state vote the same for Senate and President that going forward that will happen in every single election until the end of time.

Yeah, this is such a hilariously bad take. Even in 2016, Republicans almost lost a Senate race in a Trump +18 state and almost certainly would have held NH if it had not been for the conservative Independent candidate (Aaron Day) who received 2.4% of the vote.

The below scenerios are not impossible next year:

1) Trump loses Michigan and Peters sleepwalks and loses to a Republican candidate with high name ID.

2) Trump eeks out a week in Arizona due to a thin Democratic margin in Maricopa County, underwhelmng Democratic margin in Pima and a monstrous Trump margin in the remainder of the state for the GOP. But Kelly ends up defeating McSally. This is probably a highly likely scenerio.

3) North Carolina will be close irrespective next year due to demographics. Just a few niche voters can make a shift.

4) A Democratic win in Maine while Collins wins reelection seems like the most probable outcome at this point.

5) Trump/Dem Senate Kansas result has been a possibility for months and has been remarkably stable.

Those are five split possibilities right there!


Also coalitions could be significantly different. Duckworth and Clinton had differing coalitions even if the present trends probably cost Duckworth several downstate counties and prevented Kirk from winning his home county of Lake.


For 2022 midterms I do not know if I would call Hogan the Democratic Bredesen. Hogan would not be old news in 2022 and he may have a ceiling of 48% in a Senate race but a third party could put him in the Senate in a Democratic midterm.

Anyway all states voting the same for President and Senate in 2020... is. not. going. to. happen. Period.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,516
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: December 16, 2019, 04:14:55 PM »

McCain, who was a compassionate conservative was for: climate change, background checks and campaign finance reform, everything Graham, Sullivan, McSally, Gardner, Cornyn and McConnell arent. Collins, Ernst and SMC have been willing to compromise,  this is why the political divide is the way it is now. Why, those ones that dont want Reform will lose, in 2020, rather than 2022, where the outparty does better in midterms; consequently,  why Dems must regain Senate in 2020, not wait, for 2022, may miss our chance.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 12 queries.