Why does Missouri have such a large Native American population?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 12:29:30 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Why does Missouri have such a large Native American population?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why does Missouri have such a large Native American population?  (Read 472 times)
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,030
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 21, 2023, 02:15:54 PM »

There are not as far as I can tell any Reservations in the state. However it's 2.84% Native American and they seem to be fairly evenly spread out. St. Louis is about 1.8% Native American, and Kansas City is about the state average at 2.8%, making them two of the most Native American urban areas. Springfield is almost 4% Native American.

That's significantly higher than the national numbers, especially for a state with no Reservations or concentration. Why so?
Logged
TDAS04
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,527
Bhutan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 21, 2023, 03:57:16 PM »

IIRC, Kansas City was a major destination for Native Americans during the 1950s, who were encouraged by the US Government at the time to settle in urban areas. Maybe St. Louis was too, but I wasn't aware of that.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,971


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 21, 2023, 09:05:38 PM »

IIRC, Kansas City was a major destination for Native Americans during the 1950s, who were encouraged by the US Government at the time to settle in urban areas. Maybe St. Louis was too, but I wasn't aware of that.

Could it be migration from Oklahoma?
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,030
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 22, 2023, 12:02:04 AM »

IIRC, Kansas City was a major destination for Native Americans during the 1950s, who were encouraged by the US Government at the time to settle in urban areas. Maybe St. Louis was too, but I wasn't aware of that.

Could it be migration from Oklahoma?
Hmm, thatwould explain Springfield.
Logged
jimrtex
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,817
Marshall Islands


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 22, 2023, 10:19:49 AM »

There are not as far as I can tell any Reservations in the state. However it's 2.84% Native American and they seem to be fairly evenly spread out. St. Louis is about 1.8% Native American, and Kansas City is about the state average at 2.8%, making them two of the most Native American urban areas. Springfield is almost 4% Native American.

That's significantly higher than the national numbers, especially for a state with no Reservations or concentration. Why so?
Is it significantly higher than that for other states? Provide data.

147K AIAN alone or in combination.
22K AIAN alone

of the 147K AIAN or in combination, 75K did not specify a specific tribe.

57K claim to be Cherokee alone or in combination, but only 2600 claim to be members of the Cherokee Nation. There are likely many people whose Aunt Elizabeth claimed to be part Indian. They thought she might be crazy (she had blond hair and blue eyes), but then when doing genealogical research came across her bar application in Texas, that proved she was Indian.

There were reservations in what is now Kansas (outside the United States). After Kansas became a state, some were moved to Oklahoma. The reason the Osage reservation still exists in Oklahoma, is because they took the money they received for their land in Kansas and bought the land in Oklahoma. These were mostly directly west of Kansas City, Missouri - in what is now Kansas City, Kansas and Johnson County.

Others may be an infusion from Oklahoma. If you want to eat, you have to grow it yourself, or have a job.

There does appear to be a large number of Blackfeet. There may have been effectively a colonization, where some tribal members to moved to Kansas City(?), and then provided a support network for cousins, etc. Same phenomena as there has been and are from other emigrant groups.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.212 seconds with 12 queries.