The "Gore lost because of impeachment" narrative (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 08:21:54 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results
  2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  The "Gore lost because of impeachment" narrative (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: The "Gore lost because of impeachment" narrative  (Read 2668 times)
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,213
United States


« on: January 04, 2022, 09:41:03 PM »

I’ve never heard that the impeachment hurt Gore. In fact, what I always hear is that Gore running away from Clinton backfired.

And why did he run away from Clinton to begin with?  Rhymes with lin-deechment.

The 2000 election was close enough that you could make the case for a hundred different things making the difference between a Gore win and a Gore loss. Nonetheless, I think the narrative about impeachment costing Gore a win lacks strong supporting evidence. It seemed to emerge largely because people wanted to make the point that impeaching Trump would actually benefit Democrats politically (and they seem to have been wrong there, given that Trump's approvals are currently the highest they've been since his first year in office).

What is clear to me, though, is that the drive to impeachment cost Republicans in the 1998 mid-terms, leaving  Bush with narrow majorities to push his programs through Congress.

And then Trump lost by more than Romney! His opponent taking a larger vote share than Reagan himself. Hmmm.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 13 queries.