Why were guns so much more of an issue in 2000 than before or since?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 02:55:20 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results
  2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Why were guns so much more of an issue in 2000 than before or since?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why were guns so much more of an issue in 2000 than before or since?  (Read 1133 times)
darklordoftech
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,417
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 30, 2019, 04:10:59 PM »

Bush said he supported the Assault Weapons Ban (which I’d think would remove much of the contrast between him and Gore), and gun violence and gun laws were issues in 1992-1996 and are issues in 2002-present, so what made guns so much of an issue in 2000 than in 1996 or today?
Logged
Sumner 1868
tara gilesbie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,058
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 30, 2019, 10:38:23 PM »

Columbine coverage was an absolute hysteria, and many felt it confirmed the wisdom the cultural paranoia that was so common in the 1990s. Moreover, virtually every political group found a favorite scapegoat from the tragedy. For urban liberals that bogeyman happened to be firearms, and Bill Bradley had argued in the primaries Gore didn't support gun control enough.

As for Bush not really being any different, this is very true. You can see that on his campaign website. But Charlton Heston already decided before the election beating Gore would be the NRA's main goal that year.

https://www.cnn.com/2000/US/05/23/nra.politics/index.html
Logged
junior chįmp
Mondale_was_an_insidejob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,396
Croatia
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 01, 2019, 05:56:23 PM »
« Edited: December 01, 2019, 06:01:08 PM by Mondale »

Issues which are made into major political issues dont have to be either rational or the result of specific policy grievances. Guns are turning into a white identity issue in response to the changing demographics of this country and the seemingly increasing attention given to it as an issue has more to do with the crazies taking over the GOP in response to said demographic change.

A lot of people on Atlas assume that the issue of guns is due to some rational policy objective about which type of guns should be legal or the legal capacity limit for rounds, etc.... but it never has anything to do with that. Issues can be purely tribal and symbolic with no shred of logical purpose.
Logged
darklordoftech
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,417
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 01, 2019, 06:17:38 PM »

Issues which are made into major political issues dont have to be either rational or the result of specific policy grievances. Guns are turning into a white identity issue in response to the changing demographics of this country and the seemingly increasing attention given to it as an issue has more to do with the crazies taking over the GOP in response to said demographic change.

A lot of people on Atlas assume that the issue of guns is due to some rational policy objective about which type of guns should be legal or the legal capacity limit for rounds, etc.... but it never has anything to do with that. Issues can be purely tribal and symbolic with no shred of logical purpose.
I’m not aware of their being any demographic change from 1996 to 2000. If anything, 1997-9/10/2001 was an era of minimal racial and demographic tensions.
Logged
junior chįmp
Mondale_was_an_insidejob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,396
Croatia
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: December 01, 2019, 06:50:09 PM »

Issues which are made into major political issues dont have to be either rational or the result of specific policy grievances. Guns are turning into a white identity issue in response to the changing demographics of this country and the seemingly increasing attention given to it as an issue has more to do with the crazies taking over the GOP in response to said demographic change.

A lot of people on Atlas assume that the issue of guns is due to some rational policy objective about which type of guns should be legal or the legal capacity limit for rounds, etc.... but it never has anything to do with that. Issues can be purely tribal and symbolic with no shred of logical purpose.
I’m not aware of their being any demographic change from 1996 to 2000. If anything, 1997-9/10/2001 was an era of minimal racial and demographic tensions.

The time period in which political issues become major political issues is irrelevant. Whether or not guns mattered more in 2000 or 1996 or 1992 doesn't really have to have an straightforward causal explanation. It's pure happenstance that it started mattering more in 2000 than in past elections -or- it was the result of generational turnover within the party structure.

Think of guns turning into a major political issue as a result of a slow moving process driven by a right wing political elite that know future demographics and changing political coalitions that are coming. Guns were lumped into their political coalition along with other issues as the result of pure historical circumstances for random groups of right-wing political activists (as opposed to logical policy grievances).  Now ordinary voters don't know complex things like this but they take their cue from party leaders and adopt major issues accordingly which they assume must matter for some reason since someone higher up on the hierarchy have made it so. Because there has been a slow decent into crazy town within the GOP starting with Reagan and the political fruits of that have come into fruition at random times based on the political make up of SCOTUS or the Congress; its tempting to seek causal explanations for why a certain issue became a major issue but alot of times there is none.

Guns being correlated with white resentment has more to do with the GOP slowly emptying out over time as the party of resentful white Christian males from rural areas and due to that....certain issues "float to the top" in matter of importance.
Logged
Intell
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,817
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -1.24

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: March 31, 2020, 07:46:08 PM »

Loll I’m gonna laugh at this guns are a white tribal issue, when plenty of black people own guns.
Logged
brucejoel99
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,675
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: March 31, 2020, 09:18:28 PM »

Because it was the first election held in post-Columbine America.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.037 seconds with 13 queries.