Defining a "realignment" (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 02:52:31 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Defining a "realignment" (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Defining a "realignment"  (Read 728 times)
Wazza [INACTIVE]
Wazza1901
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,927
« on: November 24, 2019, 09:32:10 AM »

So 1968 should be seen as a hard partisan realignment, with 1980 being more of a soft ideological realignment. 

Why begin in 1968? 1952 is clearly a far more suitable starting point when discussing GOP inroads into the post-war South. It does after all mark the beginning of a proper two party system there with Eisenhower flipping a number of Southern states and drawing strength even from parts of the Deep South such as its "black belt" region (white voters there) and major urban areas. Even down-ballot races became more competitive prior to 68 as shown by the election of John Tower in 60 and the strong showing for Republicans in the 1962 Alabama and South Carolina senate races.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 12 queries.