2020 Census and Redistricting Thread: Virginia
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 03:33:42 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  2020 Census and Redistricting Thread: Virginia
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 ... 36
Author Topic: 2020 Census and Redistricting Thread: Virginia  (Read 57811 times)
Sol
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,146
Bosnia and Herzegovina


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #225 on: June 28, 2020, 08:59:53 AM »


That Yellow district is incredibly ugly.
Logged
SevenEleven
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #226 on: June 28, 2020, 01:11:45 PM »

I changed it to this:
Logged
Starry Eyed Jagaloon
Blairite
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,853
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #227 on: June 28, 2020, 01:15:18 PM »


I'd swap Roanoke over to yellow in exchange for those four southern counties.
Logged
dbatche3
Rookie
**
Posts: 32
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #228 on: June 28, 2020, 08:03:03 PM »

My attempt at a fair map. Didn't attempt to make this a gerrymander one way or the other, you be the judge if I was successful:



And some summary statistics:

DistrictColorClinton %Trump %Partisan Lean (2012-18)Notes
1Dark Blue47.946.4D+6.0
2Dark Green45.748.2D+3.9
3Dark Purple61.533.0D+33.445.3% Black
4Red58.936.3D+25.642.6% Black
5Yellow42.752.1R+5.3
6Jade33.660.6R+21.8
7Brown42.951.0R+5.1
8Light Purple72.820.3D+52.2
9Light Blue27.468.2R+33.6
10Pink58.634.4D+26.1
11Chartreuse55.238.0D+19.0

In a D wave year, this could be 9-2 D; in an R wave year, this could be 6-5 R. By taking in more of Prince William County, the 1st District gets quite a bit more Democratic. By contrast, the 11th District goes out into Fauquier County and gets quite a bit more Republican, though probably not enough to make it competitive.
Logged
Starry Eyed Jagaloon
Blairite
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,853
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #229 on: June 28, 2020, 09:21:01 PM »

^ That's one of the best VA maps I've seen.
Logged
Storr
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,223
Moldova, Republic of


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #230 on: June 28, 2020, 09:41:16 PM »

^ That's one of the best VA maps I've seen.
I agree. The most important thing for me is the "look" test, and this map simply looks good. The one issue I could see would be that Spanberger's 7th district gets ever so slightly more (non Atlas) red. Her current district went for Trump 50-44% in 2016.
Logged
LimoLiberal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,535


Political Matrix
E: -3.71, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #231 on: June 28, 2020, 10:32:41 PM »

Here's my attempt at a map the commission might pass. I based it partially off the current map with some incumbent protection. This is a 5-4-2 map with the two competitive districts improved for Luria and Spanberger. I'm fairly new to this so all feedback is welcome.

I know the numbering is off.



VA-01: Trump 65-31, Gillespie 64-35, Safe R (Morgan Griffith)
VA-02: Trump 62-34, Gillespie 64-36, Safe R (Bob Good)
VA-03: Trump 61-33, Gillespie 62-37, Safe R (Ben Cline)
VA-04: Clinton 62-34, Northam 64-35, Safe D and 45% BVAP (Don McEachin)
VA-05 (yellow): Clinton 48-45, Northam 53-46, Lean D but Likely D for Spanberger (Abigail Spanberger)
VA-06: Clinton 60-33, Northam 65-34, Safe D (Jennifer Wexton)
VA-07 (brown): Clinton 73-20, Northam 76-23, Safe D (Don Beyer)
VA-08: Clinton 59-35, Northam 62-37, Safe D (Gerry Connolly)
VA-09: Trump 52-42, Gillespie 53-46, Likely R (Rob Wittman) <- Kaine actually won this district by a point
VA-10: Clinton 59-36, Northam 64-34, Safe D and 42% BVAP (Bobby Scott)
VA-11: Trump 47-47, Northam 53-46, Tossup but Lean D for Luria (Elaine Luria)
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,368


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #232 on: June 28, 2020, 11:19:30 PM »
« Edited: June 29, 2020, 12:45:25 AM by lfromnj »

^ That's one of the best VA maps I've seen.
I agree. The most important thing for me is the "look" test, and this map simply looks good. The one issue I could see would be that Spanberger's 7th district gets ever so slightly more (non Atlas) red. Her current district went for Trump 50-44% in 2016.
Why is that an issue?
I thought the goal was a fair map/non gerrymandered map? The reason it moves right is because VA 7 should probably have Hanover county in  Richmond Suburban district.

Unless the problem you speak of is that the commission wouldn't be happy with that map.  Well that would be pretty obvious considering both Spanberger and Whitman get hurt pretty bad.
Anyway I do love Sev calling my map a GOP gerrymander when the only partisan difference was shifting 1 district to the right by 2 points. Anyway I personally prefer my NOVA exurban district with Charlottesville so I don't get why people think my decision was partisan while he makes a nearly locked 8-3 map with the exception of Richmond.
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,368


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #233 on: June 28, 2020, 11:37:58 PM »
« Edited: June 28, 2020, 11:45:29 PM by lfromnj »

My attempt at a fair map. Didn't attempt to make this a gerrymander one way or the other, you be the judge if I was successful:



And some summary statistics:

DistrictColorClinton %Trump %Partisan Lean (2012-18)Notes
1Dark Blue47.946.4D+6.0
2Dark Green45.748.2D+3.9
3Dark Purple61.533.0D+33.445.3% Black
4Red58.936.3D+25.642.6% Black
5Yellow42.752.1R+5.3
6Jade33.660.6R+21.8
7Brown42.951.0R+5.1
8Light Purple72.820.3D+52.2
9Light Blue27.468.2R+33.6
10Pink58.634.4D+26.1
11Chartreuse55.238.0D+19.0

In a D wave year, this could be 9-2 D; in an R wave year, this could be 6-5 R. By taking in more of Prince William County, the 1st District gets quite a bit more Democratic. By contrast, the 11th District goes out into Fauquier County and gets quite a bit more Republican, though probably not enough to make it competitive.
I still don't agree with the NOVA split like that, but at least here its not a gerrymander by giving Fairfax county incredible influence over 4 districts when its stuck into a corner and almost perfectly fits 2 with Arlington and Alexandria added.Other than NOVA I gotta say the map is very nice, The Richmond district doesn't split Richmond and puts in Hanover and you used the smart and easy choice for the VA beach district by taking Chesapeake.
If I was working from your map I would personally make VA 1 finish taking Caroline and King William county and then do a rotation between VA 7/VA5/VA 11 /VA 1 to remove that county split and region split(Tidewater) although that make VA 5 a bit too narrow and ugly?
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,368


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #234 on: June 29, 2020, 12:51:30 AM »



Anyway if I was forced to make the NOVA triple road split I don't feel eastern PWC and the tidewater have too little in common  to really do that. This version does split the Fredricksburg metro however with the taking of Spotsylvania county.

The partisanship of VA 1/VA2/VA7/ are all the same as dbatches map so my changing of their map is purely for non partisan purposes.
Logged
heatcharger
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,389
Sweden


Political Matrix
E: -1.04, S: -0.24

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #235 on: June 29, 2020, 01:13:49 AM »

A lot of people have been congratulating me on making such a good congressional map of Virginia:


Fairfax County:



DistrictColorClinton %Trump %Northam %Gillespie %Kaine %Stewart %
1Dark Blue52.641.056.142.760.137.8
2Dark Green47.347.650.848.153.544.9
3Dark Purple60.833.064.334.568.229.8
4Red49.544.156.042.857.939.9
5Yellow43.250.747.950.950.847.0
6Jade31.564.033.465.536.462.0
7Brown53.641.957.041.959.439.1
8Light Purple67.725.571.827.274.223.3
9Light Blue27.467.731.767.035.462.9
10Pink45.448.249.949.053.744.2
11Chartreuse64.728.368.430.671.226.6

Assorted thoughts:
VA-5: Split UVA in a slightly ugly fashion, but enjoyed uniting the district with our friends at UMW and Liberty. Virginia Tech almost made it in the competitive district, but instead are condemned to VA-9.
VA-10: The failson district -- CIA/Raytheon thugs are reunited with their kids at JMU.
VA-11: Most high school rivalries are preserved.
Logged
cvparty
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,100
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #236 on: June 29, 2020, 01:23:41 AM »

Anyway if I was forced to make the NOVA triple road split I don't feel eastern PWC and the tidewater have too little in common  to really do that. This version does split the Fredricksburg metro however with the taking of Spotsylvania county.

The partisanship of VA 1/VA2/VA7/ are all the same as dbatches map so my changing of their map is purely for non partisan purposes.
i kinda like this map, but keep loudoun county whole with CD 10. demographically makes no sense to put any part of loudoun with the shenandoah valley
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,368


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #237 on: June 29, 2020, 02:19:58 AM »
« Edited: June 29, 2020, 02:23:59 AM by lfromnj »



And here's a map which tries to barely respect COIs but maximize competitive district. VA 6th and the 9th are combined to create room for a swing Charlottesville seat at Trump +4
Then VA 10th is pushed out despite massive population growth to make it Likely D at Clinton +6
VA 1st is then pushed in for a Clinton +1 district
Finally VA 7th and VA 2 are Trump +7 and Trump +3 respectively. Obviously has the split of the Shenandoah and VA 5 is a bit ugly but other than that its honestly not that bad. With some precint trades between VA 10 and 11 you can even make VA 10 Lean D at Clinton +3
Logged
RussFeingoldWasRobbed
Progress96
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,249
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -6.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #238 on: June 29, 2020, 01:32:11 PM »

What are Lurias chances lfromnj?
Will she get screwed over by the new law?
Logged
S019
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,336
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -1.39

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #239 on: July 02, 2020, 04:46:23 PM »
« Edited: July 02, 2020, 04:50:17 PM by Speaker of the Lincoln Council S019 »

A lot of people have been congratulating me on making such a good congressional map of Virginia:


Fairfax County:




DistrictColorClinton %Trump %Northam %Gillespie %Kaine %Stewart %
1Dark Blue52.641.056.142.760.137.8
2Dark Green47.347.650.848.153.544.9
3Dark Purple60.833.064.334.568.229.8
4Red49.544.156.042.857.939.9
5Yellow43.250.747.950.950.847.0
6Jade31.564.033.465.536.462.0
7Brown53.641.957.041.959.439.1
8Light Purple67.725.571.827.274.223.3
9Light Blue27.467.731.767.035.462.9
10Pink45.448.249.949.053.744.2
11Chartreuse64.728.368.430.671.226.6

Assorted thoughts:
VA-5: Split UVA in a slightly ugly fashion, but enjoyed uniting the district with our friends at UMW and Liberty. Virginia Tech almost made it in the competitive district, but instead are condemned to VA-9.
VA-10: The failson district -- CIA/Raytheon thugs are reunited with their kids at JMU.
VA-11: Most high school rivalries are preserved.

This map is an abomination. First of all, DelMarVA basically has to pair with Virginia Beach due to road connections. I'm not sure if the 7th has enough minorities in it. Trying to pair all of Loudoun with Shenadoah would only happen in a GOP gerrymander. I'm unsure what the 5th and 6th are supposed to accomplish. Also county lines would be nice, because I can't properly analyze the 1st, the way that you drew it. Also there is absolutely no need to give Richmond its own seat and very few maps will do that. Most maps will put in either the 4th which is the Newport News  to Richmond minority seat or in the suburban Henrico based 7th. The quad cut of Fairfax just seems unnecessary, giving McLean to the 10th actually makes some sense, given how it and Great Falls are different than places like Reston, but I don't get the logic behind pushing the 1st into parts of Fairfax.
Logged
MAPZZ
Rookie
**
Posts: 74
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #240 on: July 03, 2020, 02:44:34 AM »

A lot of people have been congratulating me on making such a good congressional map of Virginia:


Fairfax County:




DistrictColorClinton %Trump %Northam %Gillespie %Kaine %Stewart %
1Dark Blue52.641.056.142.760.137.8
2Dark Green47.347.650.848.153.544.9
3Dark Purple60.833.064.334.568.229.8
4Red49.544.156.042.857.939.9
5Yellow43.250.747.950.950.847.0
6Jade31.564.033.465.536.462.0
7Brown53.641.957.041.959.439.1
8Light Purple67.725.571.827.274.223.3
9Light Blue27.467.731.767.035.462.9
10Pink45.448.249.949.053.744.2
11Chartreuse64.728.368.430.671.226.6

Assorted thoughts:
VA-5: Split UVA in a slightly ugly fashion, but enjoyed uniting the district with our friends at UMW and Liberty. Virginia Tech almost made it in the competitive district, but instead are condemned to VA-9.
VA-10: The failson district -- CIA/Raytheon thugs are reunited with their kids at JMU.
VA-11: Most high school rivalries are preserved.

This map is an abomination. First of all, DelMarVA basically has to pair with Virginia Beach due to road connections. I'm not sure if the 7th has enough minorities in it. Trying to pair all of Loudoun with Shenadoah would only happen in a GOP gerrymander. I'm unsure what the 5th and 6th are supposed to accomplish. Also county lines would be nice, because I can't properly analyze the 1st, the way that you drew it. Also there is absolutely no need to give Richmond its own seat and very few maps will do that. Most maps will put in either the 4th which is the Newport News  to Richmond minority seat or in the suburban Henrico based 7th. The quad cut of Fairfax just seems unnecessary, giving McLean to the 10th actually makes some sense, given how it and Great Falls are different than places like Reston, but I don't get the logic behind pushing the 1st into parts of Fairfax.


Successfully trolled
Logged
Idaho Conservative
BWP Conservative
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,234
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.00, S: 6.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #241 on: July 04, 2020, 03:00:00 AM »


pretty solid 5-1-5 map the court could draw.  Not a gerrymander but tilts R.  https://davesredistricting.org/join/2bf45947-9f8c-441d-b02c-f1e566607039
Logged
Nyvin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,660
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #242 on: July 08, 2020, 09:19:37 PM »

Slightly different take.   I'm a big fan of the Shenandoah Valley district btw.

https://davesredistricting.org/join/c7efb37e-9149-41af-8cbb-1cef67d1af22

Logged
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,566
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #243 on: July 09, 2020, 04:24:07 PM »

Slightly different take.   I'm a big fan of the Shenandoah Valley district btw.

https://davesredistricting.org/join/c7efb37e-9149-41af-8cbb-1cef67d1af22



Now that is a really good map.  Hopefully that is the map that my state will adopt for the rest of the decade....
Logged
Storr
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,223
Moldova, Republic of


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #244 on: July 10, 2020, 02:49:59 PM »

^ That's one of the best VA maps I've seen.
I agree. The most important thing for me is the "look" test, and this map simply looks good. The one issue I could see would be that Spanberger's 7th district gets ever so slightly more (non Atlas) red. Her current district went for Trump 50-44% in 2016.
Why is that an issue?
I thought the goal was a fair map/non gerrymandered map? The reason it moves right is because VA 7 should probably have Hanover county in  Richmond Suburban district.

Unless the problem you speak of is that the commission wouldn't be happy with that map.  Well that would be pretty obvious considering both Spanberger and Whitman get hurt pretty bad.
Anyway I do love Sev calling my map a GOP gerrymander when the only partisan difference was shifting 1 district to the right by 2 points. Anyway I personally prefer my NOVA exurban district with Charlottesville so I don't get why people think my decision was partisan while he makes a nearly locked 8-3 map with the exception of Richmond.
I mean it as an issue in that I doubt Spanberger would be happy about that.
Logged
GALeftist
sansymcsansface
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,741


Political Matrix
E: -7.29, S: -9.48

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #245 on: September 24, 2020, 10:47:15 PM »

So is it basically guaranteed that redistricting will get kicked to the Supreme Court?
Logged
LimoLiberal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,535


Political Matrix
E: -3.71, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #246 on: September 25, 2020, 12:39:16 AM »

The redistricting amendment isn't as secure as it seems. The new Wason Center poll had it leading 48-28 but Republicans were opposed to it by a 10 point margin. That lead may seem insurmountable but get this: the Arlington, Fairfax, Loudoun, and other local democratic committees are urging a "no" vote and the Democratic sample ballots will reflect that. There will undoubtedly be Democrats that hear about the redistricting amendment in vague terms and support it prior to the election but the check next to the "no" on the sample ballot will flip their vote. This all creates the opportunity for an unwieldy coalition of hardcore Virginia Republicans and NoVA Democrats to defeat the amendment.
Logged
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,566
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #247 on: November 26, 2020, 03:42:56 AM »

The redistricting amendment isn't as secure as it seems. The new Wason Center poll had it leading 48-28 but Republicans were opposed to it by a 10 point margin. That lead may seem insurmountable but get this: the Arlington, Fairfax, Loudoun, and other local democratic committees are urging a "no" vote and the Democratic sample ballots will reflect that. There will undoubtedly be Democrats that hear about the redistricting amendment in vague terms and support it prior to the election but the check next to the "no" on the sample ballot will flip their vote. This all creates the opportunity for an unwieldy coalition of hardcore Virginia Republicans and NoVA Democrats to defeat the amendment.

This post did not age well. 

Logged
SevenEleven
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #248 on: November 26, 2020, 05:52:19 AM »

The redistricting amendment isn't as secure as it seems. The new Wason Center poll had it leading 48-28 but Republicans were opposed to it by a 10 point margin. That lead may seem insurmountable but get this: the Arlington, Fairfax, Loudoun, and other local democratic committees are urging a "no" vote and the Democratic sample ballots will reflect that. There will undoubtedly be Democrats that hear about the redistricting amendment in vague terms and support it prior to the election but the check next to the "no" on the sample ballot will flip their vote. This all creates the opportunity for an unwieldy coalition of hardcore Virginia Republicans and NoVA Democrats to defeat the amendment.

This post did not age well. 



It wasn't a good post back in September. 🤷
Logged
S019
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,336
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -1.39

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #249 on: November 26, 2020, 04:05:56 PM »

VA Reps may push the 5-1 court to do something like this: https://davesredistricting.org/join/bce45050-8fd6-4923-9e68-81b01682d91d


5 and 7 are the leftovers, but the leftovers clearly benefit the GOP, the VRA seats are strengthened, which just happens to help shore up 2, and Albemarle honestly doesn't have a clear place to go, so I can see the 5-1 court just sticking it in Appalachia. In a vacuum, each of these decisions can clearly be justified as fine pairings, but on the broader scale, the side effects create a blatantly lopsided map, 6 might be vulnerable, but Appalachia is probably inelastic enough, 7 might also be vulnerable, but is currently D held anyways, I would not be shocked if the final map looks more like this than the quad cuts of Fairfax being proposed in this thread, and other than the NoVA seats, this map isn't even that ugly.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 ... 36  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.114 seconds with 11 queries.