Project: Austrian election results by NUTS-3 regions
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 15, 2024, 11:06:08 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Project: Austrian election results by NUTS-3 regions
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Project: Austrian election results by NUTS-3 regions  (Read 429 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,177
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 30, 2021, 02:29:17 PM »

I might create some maps based not on the usual districts, but rather on the NUTS-3 regions:



The red areas (urban/suburban) vs. the remaining (rural) ones.

There are 7 major urban areas in the country (ranked by population, out of 8.901 million):

2.589.000 Vienna & suburbs north+south
   596.000 Linz-Wels & suburbs
   447.000 Graz & suburbs
   369.000 Salzburg & suburbs
   312.000 Innsbruck & suburbs
   305.000 Rhein Valley
   289.000 Klagenfurt-Villach & suburbs
4.907.000 Total (55% of the total population)

Everyone knows that the urban and suburban areas voted much more for VdB in 2016 than the rural areas, but I'm interested in the exact margins in each urban area vs. the rural remaining areas and how the urban areas combined voted vs. the combined rural area.

https://statistik.at/web_en/classifications/regional_breakdown/nuts_units/index.html
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,371
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 30, 2021, 02:42:18 PM »

looks cool! Das ist wunderbar.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,177
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 30, 2021, 02:44:47 PM »

Vienna & suburbs btw have a higher population density than any US metro other than NY-Newark:

https://www.citypopulation.de/en/usa/combmetro/

The Vienna metro has 2.6 million people on 4.600 kmē, that's a density of 565/kmē.

NY-Newark has a density of 703/kmē.

All other US metros are less densely populated than 565/kmē.

Comparable US metros in populations are:

Salt Lake City
Sacramento
Pittsburgh
San Antonio

But unlike Vienna with 4.600 kmē in area, SLC has an area of 60.500 (!) kmē.

Sacramento 18.900, Pittsburgh 18.300 and San Antonio 21.900 kmē !
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,371
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 30, 2021, 02:48:00 PM »

Vienna & suburbs btw have a higher population density than any US metro other than NY-Newark:

https://www.citypopulation.de/en/usa/combmetro/

The Vienna metro has 2.6 million people on 4.600 kmē, that's a density of 565/kmē.

NY-Newark has a density of 703/kmē.

All other US metros are less densely populated than 565/kmē.

Comparable US metros in populations are:

Salt Lake City
Sacramento
Pittsburgh
San Antonio

But unlike Vienna with 4.600 kmē in area, SLC has an area of 60.500 (!) kmē.

Sacramento 18.900, Pittsburgh 18.300 and San Antonio 21.900 kmē !
What about Metro Boston?
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,177
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 30, 2021, 02:49:46 PM »

Vienna & suburbs btw have a higher population density than any US metro other than NY-Newark:

https://www.citypopulation.de/en/usa/combmetro/

The Vienna metro has 2.6 million people on 4.600 kmē, that's a density of 565/kmē.

NY-Newark has a density of 703/kmē.

All other US metros are less densely populated than 565/kmē.

Comparable US metros in populations are:

Salt Lake City
Sacramento
Pittsburgh
San Antonio

But unlike Vienna with 4.600 kmē in area, SLC has an area of 60.500 (!) kmē.

Sacramento 18.900, Pittsburgh 18.300 and San Antonio 21.900 kmē !
What about Metro Boston?

Boston CSA has 8.29 million people on 25.100 kmē, for a density of 330/kmē.
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,371
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 30, 2021, 02:52:11 PM »

Vienna & suburbs btw have a higher population density than any US metro other than NY-Newark:

https://www.citypopulation.de/en/usa/combmetro/

The Vienna metro has 2.6 million people on 4.600 kmē, that's a density of 565/kmē.

NY-Newark has a density of 703/kmē.

All other US metros are less densely populated than 565/kmē.

Comparable US metros in populations are:

Salt Lake City
Sacramento
Pittsburgh
San Antonio

But unlike Vienna with 4.600 kmē in area, SLC has an area of 60.500 (!) kmē.

Sacramento 18.900, Pittsburgh 18.300 and San Antonio 21.900 kmē !
What about Metro Boston?

Boston CSA has 8.29 million people on 25.100 kmē, for a density of 330/kmē.
Which US metro, regardless of population overall, comes closest in population density?
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,177
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: January 30, 2021, 02:57:19 PM »

Vienna & suburbs btw have a higher population density than any US metro other than NY-Newark:

https://www.citypopulation.de/en/usa/combmetro/

The Vienna metro has 2.6 million people on 4.600 kmē, that's a density of 565/kmē.

NY-Newark has a density of 703/kmē.

All other US metros are less densely populated than 565/kmē.

Comparable US metros in populations are:

Salt Lake City
Sacramento
Pittsburgh
San Antonio

But unlike Vienna with 4.600 kmē in area, SLC has an area of 60.500 (!) kmē.

Sacramento 18.900, Pittsburgh 18.300 and San Antonio 21.900 kmē !
What about Metro Boston?

Boston CSA has 8.29 million people on 25.100 kmē, for a density of 330/kmē.
Which US metro, regardless of population overall, comes closest in population density?

Tampa, FL at 491/kmē.

But just go on the website I posted above.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.225 seconds with 13 queries.