LC 4.8: Internet restrictions act (Failed) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 06:15:03 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government
  Regional Governments (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  LC 4.8: Internet restrictions act (Failed) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: LC 4.8: Internet restrictions act (Failed)  (Read 847 times)
Pragmatist_TNAG
Rookie
**
Posts: 150


« on: September 30, 2019, 06:40:55 AM »

This bill is very flawed in its current state, and I will not support it.

As others have stated, sections II and III are blatantly unconstitutional. As in Section II.1.b, "Placing, commenting or discussing pro-suicide, pro-ana and pro-mia comments would be fined with 150 dollars." Discussing these conditions could be under a wide range of topics, like threats or confessions of doing these acts. But debate, ridicule, and even supoort for those trying to change could be flagged under this bill. Like with suicide support groups online, would these groups be fined a thousand dollars, and its users be fined hundreds?

In sections I and III face similar issues, poorly defined ways to violate the bill. Would those trying to expose pedophiles be punished. Would thise trying to have proper discourse be fined?
Logged
Pragmatist_TNAG
Rookie
**
Posts: 150


« Reply #1 on: October 11, 2019, 09:54:59 PM »

Nay
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 13 queries.