Ah, and lastly, you want them to remain in poverty, don't you?
In a sense, this is a good point - just as every employer wishes his employees to remain needy. However on the other hand I spend about $30-50 every day enriching them...
No, they are in poverty because of the social hierarchy, which of course predated their births. They are oppressed persons like all poors, and no personal characterists of theirs are causative factors.
I certainly do, but no more submissive than I like my maid, or than an American corporation likes its employees. In fact, I'm probably a lot less demanding than the typical employer back home. The Third Way is always optional, and often costs more!
I argue with everyone who disagrees with me, everett, and call anyone who is intolerant of prostitution a prude. It has nothing to do with gender. After all doesn't the fact that I 'get in your face' just as much as I do with Philip, dazzleman, or any of the masculine fascists show a certain amount of 'respect'?
I'm sure you consider that offensive, but I don't find it so at all. Rather, you have just expressed the delusions of youth. I 'scored' many quite surprisingly attractive women for free through my twenties and early thirties, but now I am 37, everett. You try attracting an 18-20 year old guy when you're 37. Happily, I've found a new and better way to get what I want, and why on earth shouldn't I?
Poll
