I'm concerned regarding the vague ban on possession of Title II weapons and how the regional government plans to institute such a ban. Most of these types of weapons are already heavily regulated and are not readily available for gun owners. Will museums be prohibited from displaying historical weaponry matching Title II descriptions?
If the purpose of this part of the bill is to address public safety, I would argue that the
Firearms Safety Act did that perfectly fine without instituting a ban.
Also, why are shotguns specifically targeted in Sec 5? Why tax such a specific firearm?
