Can one state get 100 EVs?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 03:51:17 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Can one state get 100 EVs?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Can one state get 100 EVs?  (Read 1337 times)
Plankton5165
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 682


P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 29, 2019, 10:11:00 PM »

I can see Texas possibly doing so in the 2100s.
Logged
brucejoel99
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,649
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: July 29, 2019, 10:27:27 PM »

Theoretically, sure, but considering the mathematical realities of population distribution, no chance in hell.
Logged
Starry Eyed Jagaloon
Blairite
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,853
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: July 30, 2019, 04:46:54 AM »

That would require a state to have 22.5% of the country's population. California could do it, but that day is a long way away.
Logged
Senator Incitatus
AMB1996
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,492
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.06, S: 5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: July 30, 2019, 09:54:30 AM »

Yes, if the House of Representatives were expanded.
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,689
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: July 30, 2019, 10:16:10 AM »

I can see Texas possibly doing so in the 2100s.

Isn't Texas on its way to being a lot less habitable in 100 years?
Logged
Annatar
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 984
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 01, 2019, 08:39:21 PM »

I can see Texas possibly doing so in the 2100s.

Isn't Texas on its way to being a lot less habitable in 100 years?

With modern technology weather doesn't matter that much anymore, air conditioning means heat is irrelevant, many of the fastest growing cities in the world are in very hot areas, hotter than Texas.
Logged
MarkD
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,172
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: August 05, 2019, 11:50:28 AM »

Theoretically, sure, but considering the mathematical realities of population distribution, no chance in hell.

Yep.
Logged
beesley
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,140
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -4.52, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: August 05, 2019, 02:11:24 PM »

That would require a state to have 22.5% of the country's population. California could do it, but that day is a long way away.

Any state with than proportion of the population should split itself.
Logged
Starry Eyed Jagaloon
Blairite
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,853
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: August 05, 2019, 02:19:24 PM »

That would require a state to have 22.5% of the country's population. California could do it, but that day is a long way away.

Any state with than proportion of the population should split itself.
Or smaller states should be merged. I've always found 50 states to be far too many.
Logged
cvparty
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,100
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: August 05, 2019, 02:23:27 PM »

That would require a state to have 22.5% of the country's population. California could do it, but that day is a long way away.

Any state with than proportion of the population should split itself.
Or smaller states should be merged. I've always found 50 states to be far too many.
idaho wyoming montana dakota megastate
Logged
Starry Eyed Jagaloon
Blairite
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,853
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: August 05, 2019, 02:33:55 PM »

That would require a state to have 22.5% of the country's population. California could do it, but that day is a long way away.

Any state with than proportion of the population should split itself.
Or smaller states should be merged. I've always found 50 states to be far too many.
idaho wyoming montana dakota megastate
But unironically. And follow natural lines. Straight line borders piss me off.
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,640
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: August 10, 2019, 12:30:02 PM »

You need a constitutional amendment to combine states.  You just need a majority of the state legislature and a majority of the US congress to split them.  It is obvious which one would be tried 1st.
Logged
Idaho Conservative
BWP Conservative
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,234
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.00, S: 6.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: August 11, 2019, 10:29:27 PM »

That would require a state to have 22.5% of the country's population. California could do it, but that day is a long way away.

Any state with than proportion of the population should split itself.
Or smaller states should be merged. I've always found 50 states to be far too many.
CT-RI-MA and VT-NH-ME megastates.  They are way too tiny.
Logged
YE
Modadmin
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,722


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: August 11, 2019, 10:32:34 PM »

That would require a state to have 22.5% of the country's population. California could do it, but that day is a long way away.

Any state with than proportion of the population should split itself.
Or smaller states should be merged. I've always found 50 states to be far too many.
CT-RI-MA and VT-NH-ME megastates.  They are way too tiny.

MA and CT aren’t exactly small states.
Logged
Technocracy Timmy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,641
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: August 11, 2019, 10:48:46 PM »

Massachusetts is larger than the 50 state average in terms of population.
Logged
Idaho Conservative
BWP Conservative
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,234
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.00, S: 6.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: August 11, 2019, 11:35:44 PM »

That would require a state to have 22.5% of the country's population. California could do it, but that day is a long way away.

Any state with than proportion of the population should split itself.
Or smaller states should be merged. I've always found 50 states to be far too many.
CT-RI-MA and VT-NH-ME megastates.  They are way too tiny.

MA and CT aren’t exactly small states.
I'm talking area wise. 
Logged
Kyng
Rookie
**
Posts: 161
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: August 14, 2019, 01:01:04 PM »

Well, I suppose Alaska could in the far, far future - if it gets flooded with climate refugees from the Sun Belt (and perhaps outside the USA). However, this probably wouldn't happen until the 2100s at the earliest, if it happens at all - and, even then, I'd say there's a good chance that it'd be divided up into multiple states.
Logged
Cassandra
Situationist
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,673


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: August 14, 2019, 01:56:26 PM »

I can see Texas possibly doing so in the 2100s.

Isn't Texas on its way to being a lot less habitable in 100 years?

With modern technology weather doesn't matter that much anymore, air conditioning means heat is irrelevant, many of the fastest growing cities in the world are in very hot areas, hotter than Texas.

Good luck keeping your electrical grid running when wet bulb temperatures soar past 35C.
Logged
jake_arlington
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 459


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: August 31, 2019, 10:12:36 PM »

Please, just no
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.052 seconds with 12 queries.