Polls and projected winner vs too close to call (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 11:42:41 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Polls and projected winner vs too close to call (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Polls and projected winner vs too close to call  (Read 682 times)
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,173
United States


« on: July 28, 2019, 07:32:28 PM »
« edited: July 28, 2019, 07:36:15 PM by L.D. Smith »
Quote from: Plankton5165 on July 28, 2019, 02:54:57 AM
In the NC senate race in 2010, Burr was ahead by 12.8 points. In the IL race for president in 2016, Clinton was ahead by 11.5 points.

The NC senate race in 2010 was too close to call and the IL presidential race in 2016 was called for Clinton at 8 pm when the polls closed. Does anyone have an idea why?


Chicago was already too dicey for Trump by that point, whereas the vote in Charlotte and The Triangle hadn't proved to be underwhelming for Marhsall.

Cities are slow counters. Simple as that.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 12 queries.