1980 if the GOP nominated Gerald Ford for a non-consecutive second term (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 06:57:29 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  1980 if the GOP nominated Gerald Ford for a non-consecutive second term (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 1980 if the GOP nominated Gerald Ford for a non-consecutive second term  (Read 2026 times)
President Johnson
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,817
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.70


« on: July 28, 2019, 04:32:49 AM »

Gerald Ford in 1980 would have handily defeated Carter, who only does slightly better in the South than he did against Reagan. I think Ford would have picked a more conservative running mate. John Tower seems like a good choice: He was more conservative, but supported Ford in 1976 primary. He's also from a southern state, helping to win Texas.



✓ Former President Gerald R. Ford (R-CA)/Senator John Tower (R-TX): 450 EV. (54.73%)
President James E. Carter (D-GA)/Vice President Walter F. Mondale (D-MN): 88 EV. (43.91%)
Logged
President Johnson
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,817
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.70


« Reply #1 on: July 28, 2019, 12:39:22 PM »

I think Ford would pick a running mate that he'd want to succeed him in 1984 seeing as how he'd be term limited.

Who? Poppy? Or Howard Baker?
Logged
President Johnson
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,817
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.70


« Reply #2 on: July 29, 2019, 01:19:10 PM »

I think Ford would pick a running mate that he'd want to succeed him in 1984 seeing as how he'd be term limited.

Who? Poppy? Or Howard Baker?

Howard Baker wouldn’t say yes cause VP would be like a step down from Party Leader in the Senate . That’s why he said no to being Reagan’s vp because it’s a step down and not only is that true , it became even more true when he became not only party leader but the Senate Majority Leader as well.


As for succeeding to the Presidency, Van Buren was the last sitting vp to be elected President at that point so the VP job wasn’t viewed as a direct line to the Presidency either

Well, he mas only minority leader, which is a job you can give up for the vice president (with a good shot at becoming president after one term). LBJ even gave up Majority Leader for the vice presidency. And he was probably the most powerful Majority leader in senate history.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 13 queries.