Bob Taft hits 6.5% approval rating (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 03:39:03 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Bob Taft hits 6.5% approval rating (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Bob Taft hits 6.5% approval rating  (Read 6147 times)
Cubby
Pim Fortuyn
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,067
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -3.74, S: -6.96

« on: November 30, 2005, 06:07:01 AM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

6.5% Approval Rating yet they still don't trust the Democrats? What the hell is wrong with Ohio! No one should complain about 1 party dominance in Massachusetts if this is the case.



Logged
Cubby
Pim Fortuyn
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,067
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -3.74, S: -6.96

« Reply #1 on: December 06, 2005, 04:01:11 AM »

6.5% Approval Rating yet they still don't trust the Democrats? What the hell is wrong with Ohio! No one should complain about 1 party dominance in Massachusetts if this is the case.

Simply because the incumbent governor is unpopular does not make the other party better by default.

In a 2 party system, yes it should
Logged
Cubby
Pim Fortuyn
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,067
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -3.74, S: -6.96

« Reply #2 on: December 06, 2005, 03:37:19 PM »


No it shouldn't.  Bob Taft is one man; not the whole GOP.  He's not even that representative of the GOP anyway.  Simply because he is a terrible governor does not mean the whole party is terrible, or that the Democrats are any better.

Let's look at this another way.  Kathleen Blanco of Louisiana is currently the lowest approved Democratic governor.  Do you think the Lousiana Republican Party as a whole suddenly looks a lot more attractive?

While your first paragraph makes sense, its not the way our strict 2 party system works. If one incumbent becomes very unpopular, then at the next election his supporters usually don't vote for the other side, but stay home, and his opponent wins by default since all that matters is who has the most votes, even if very low like Clinton in '92 with 43%.

Obviously I don't like the Louisiana GOP, but even if Blanco's base hadn't been evacuated, I'd still say that her opponent has a much better shot at winning simply by not being Blanco.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 12 queries.