I don't think striking that part from 2.3 clears it up. What is the purpose of the additional screening test? If it's free of drugs, does that mean the employer has to ignore the earlier test?
Well, obviously there are other drugs that could be tested for that employers would, for good reason, not want their workers using (i.e. meth and heroin). Although since we've legalized a slough of other drugs, it's worth considering whether these should be covered under this bill, too.
I'm not sure how that's relevant to what I was asking