Jfern, I'm not going to do something illegal just because other people did illegal things in the past.
You were disenfranchised illegally last time; I really don't want to do that to Everett now.
You can't just selectively ignore precedent.
I absolutely can. Illegal precedent will be ignored. Legal precedent will in most instances be upheld.
You may bring a lawsuit in the "Government" board if you wish; please continue any discussion of this matter in a new thread on that board. Thank you.
Funny, no one seemed to thing that it was illegal when used against me. Everyone seemed to agree that it was the reasonable course of action. You are legislating from the secretaryship with your ruling on Everett.
Give it a rest, Ferny. Q is absolutely correct - he and I worked hard at figuring out what the law said on this issue. You can take this to the ASC is you like, but you're going to lose - law trumps precedent, especially illegal precedent.
I'm sorry your vote was illegally thrown out in that previous election, but you are acting like a dick in insisting that Everett's vote
also be illegally thrown out.
THERE IS NO RULE SAYING YOU HAVE TO BE REGISTERED IN A PARTICULAR REGION TEN DAYS BEFORE THE ELECTION TO VOTE IN IT! They were wrong when they used it against your vote, and you're wrong now in trying to use it against Everett's vote. Show some goddamn maturity.