Wisconsin Megathread v3: GOP in MASSIVE DISARRAY
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 10:38:25 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Wisconsin Megathread v3: GOP in MASSIVE DISARRAY
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 60 61 62 63 64 [65] 66 67 68 69 70 ... 128
Author Topic: Wisconsin Megathread v3: GOP in MASSIVE DISARRAY  (Read 165424 times)
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,210


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1600 on: August 10, 2022, 02:46:48 PM »

Logged
SnowLabrador
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,577
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1601 on: August 10, 2022, 03:01:30 PM »



And so the pivot begins.
Logged
ProgressiveModerate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,730


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1602 on: August 10, 2022, 03:31:56 PM »

For the record it seems like it was only briefly taken down cause it's back up now.
Logged
coloradocowboi
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,636
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1603 on: August 10, 2022, 04:28:57 PM »



That's pretty funny actually
Logged
Born to Slay. Forced to Work.
leecannon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,956
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1604 on: August 10, 2022, 04:31:41 PM »



And so the pivot begins.

Is this the fabled moderate pivot that was supposed to befall Mastriano, Lake, Oz, Vance, Walker…
Logged
Progressive Pessimist
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,124
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -7.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1605 on: August 10, 2022, 06:39:14 PM »

Micehls definitely makes this an easier haul for Evers to win re-election, but I am still not moving it out of the tossup category. Evers has been consistently unpopular and Wisconsin, for as much of a defining battleground state as it is, tends to have no qualms in electing people well to the right of where the state should be. It's the GOP's second easiest chance at a pickup, but they did still in some ways make that job harder on themselves.

And by the way, I just learned about why Trump didn't endorse Kleefisch, and I can't beleive that I am still being surprised at what a petty, narcisstic, sociopathic b**** he is! Really!? Because her daughter went to a dance with a non-election denying Justice's son? How far-removed and tenuous is he taking his grudges now?!
Logged
ProgressiveModerate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,730


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1606 on: August 10, 2022, 06:49:42 PM »

Micehls definitely makes this an easier haul for Evers to win re-election, but I am still not moving it out of the tossup category. Evers has been consistently unpopular and Wisconsin, for as much of a defining battleground state as it is, tends to have no qualms in electing people well to the right of where the state should be. It's the GOP's second easiest chance at a pickup, but they did still in some ways make that job harder on themselves.

And by the way, I just learned about why Trump didn't endorse Kleefisch, and I can't beleive that I am still being surprised at what a petty, narcisstic, sociopathic b**** he is! Really!? Because her daughter went to a dance with a non-election denying Justice's son? How far-removed and tenuous is he taking his grudges now?!

To me, Wisconsin has always felt like a much more delicate balancing act for Dems than MI or PA in which their base is more concentrated and defined. Both of the main Dem metros are pretty equally influential and Democrats really can't afford to collapse in smaller town/outright rural communities either whereas MI and PA are urban/suburban enough that even an absolute collapse with rural voters can be overridden without even needing that much of a NUT performance in the cities. This is already kinda true in PA where Dems are getting pretty close to rock bottom in some of the Appalachia rurals.
Logged
Progressive Pessimist
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,124
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -7.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1607 on: August 10, 2022, 06:55:36 PM »

Micehls definitely makes this an easier haul for Evers to win re-election, but I am still not moving it out of the tossup category. Evers has been consistently unpopular and Wisconsin, for as much of a defining battleground state as it is, tends to have no qualms in electing people well to the right of where the state should be. It's the GOP's second easiest chance at a pickup, but they did still in some ways make that job harder on themselves.

And by the way, I just learned about why Trump didn't endorse Kleefisch, and I can't beleive that I am still being surprised at what a petty, narcisstic, sociopathic b**** he is! Really!? Because her daughter went to a dance with a non-election denying Justice's son? How far-removed and tenuous is he taking his grudges now?!

To me, Wisconsin has always felt like a much more delicate balancing act for Dems than MI or PA in which their base is more concentrated and defined. Both of the main Dem metros are pretty equally influential and Democrats really can't afford to collapse in smaller town/outright rural communities either whereas MI and PA are urban/suburban enough that even an absolute collapse with rural voters can be overridden without even needing that much of a NUT performance in the cities. This is already kinda true in PA where Dems are getting pretty close to rock bottom in some of the Appalachia rurals.

I think that's a good summation. Much like with Biden, a Democratic victory in Wisconsin now is going to require over-performances in Madison, Milwaukee, and the WOW counties if rural free-fall can't be offset. It's doable, but difficult.
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,210


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1608 on: August 10, 2022, 06:59:38 PM »

Micehls definitely makes this an easier haul for Evers to win re-election, but I am still not moving it out of the tossup category. Evers has been consistently unpopular and Wisconsin, for as much of a defining battleground state as it is, tends to have no qualms in electing people well to the right of where the state should be. It's the GOP's second easiest chance at a pickup, but they did still in some ways make that job harder on themselves.

And by the way, I just learned about why Trump didn't endorse Kleefisch, and I can't beleive that I am still being surprised at what a petty, narcisstic, sociopathic b**** he is! Really!? Because her daughter went to a dance with a non-election denying Justice's son? How far-removed and tenuous is he taking his grudges now?!

Not true? Marquette has always had him above water IIRC, and Morning Consult had him down a few % I believe if that. That's not "unpopular"
Logged
Progressive Pessimist
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,124
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -7.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1609 on: August 10, 2022, 07:01:34 PM »

Micehls definitely makes this an easier haul for Evers to win re-election, but I am still not moving it out of the tossup category. Evers has been consistently unpopular and Wisconsin, for as much of a defining battleground state as it is, tends to have no qualms in electing people well to the right of where the state should be. It's the GOP's second easiest chance at a pickup, but they did still in some ways make that job harder on themselves.

And by the way, I just learned about why Trump didn't endorse Kleefisch, and I can't beleive that I am still being surprised at what a petty, narcisstic, sociopathic b**** he is! Really!? Because her daughter went to a dance with a non-election denying Justice's son? How far-removed and tenuous is he taking his grudges now?!

Not true? Marquette has always had him above water IIRC, and Morning Consult had him down a few % I believe if that. That's not "unpopular"

I haven't seen any recent polling, I suppose. But last I remember he was underwater and had a reputation as not accomplishing a lot (though that might more be the fault of the Wisconsin legislature).
Logged
ProgressiveModerate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,730


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1610 on: August 10, 2022, 07:02:57 PM »

Micehls definitely makes this an easier haul for Evers to win re-election, but I am still not moving it out of the tossup category. Evers has been consistently unpopular and Wisconsin, for as much of a defining battleground state as it is, tends to have no qualms in electing people well to the right of where the state should be. It's the GOP's second easiest chance at a pickup, but they did still in some ways make that job harder on themselves.

And by the way, I just learned about why Trump didn't endorse Kleefisch, and I can't beleive that I am still being surprised at what a petty, narcisstic, sociopathic b**** he is! Really!? Because her daughter went to a dance with a non-election denying Justice's son? How far-removed and tenuous is he taking his grudges now?!

To me, Wisconsin has always felt like a much more delicate balancing act for Dems than MI or PA in which their base is more concentrated and defined. Both of the main Dem metros are pretty equally influential and Democrats really can't afford to collapse in smaller town/outright rural communities either whereas MI and PA are urban/suburban enough that even an absolute collapse with rural voters can be overridden without even needing that much of a NUT performance in the cities. This is already kinda true in PA where Dems are getting pretty close to rock bottom in some of the Appalachia rurals.

I think that's a good summation. Much like with Biden, a Democratic victory in Wisconsin now is going to require over-performances in Madison, Milwaukee, and the WOW counties if rural free-fall can't be offset. It's doable, but difficult.

A good comparison imo is Ohio where previous Dem wins relied on outright winning many rural areas and getting insane margins out of smaller communities like Lorain and Youngstown. Dem gains in Cinci and Columbus has been pretty impressive and they've held up fine in the immediate Cleveland area, but really don't have anything to show for it.

I would also say Iowa cause it's regionally similar but Ohio doesn't really have any significant D cities anyways in the way WI or OH do.
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,210


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1611 on: August 10, 2022, 07:10:15 PM »

Micehls definitely makes this an easier haul for Evers to win re-election, but I am still not moving it out of the tossup category. Evers has been consistently unpopular and Wisconsin, for as much of a defining battleground state as it is, tends to have no qualms in electing people well to the right of where the state should be. It's the GOP's second easiest chance at a pickup, but they did still in some ways make that job harder on themselves.

And by the way, I just learned about why Trump didn't endorse Kleefisch, and I can't beleive that I am still being surprised at what a petty, narcisstic, sociopathic b**** he is! Really!? Because her daughter went to a dance with a non-election denying Justice's son? How far-removed and tenuous is he taking his grudges now?!

Not true? Marquette has always had him above water IIRC, and Morning Consult had him down a few % I believe if that. That's not "unpopular"

I haven't seen any recent polling, I suppose. But last I remember he was underwater and had a reputation as not accomplishing a lot (though that might more be the fault of the Wisconsin legislature).

Last Marquette in June had him +3. Previous one before that had him +5

https://twitter.com/MULawPoll/status/1539668170700894210
Logged
ProgressiveModerate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,730


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1612 on: August 10, 2022, 07:20:01 PM »

Micehls definitely makes this an easier haul for Evers to win re-election, but I am still not moving it out of the tossup category. Evers has been consistently unpopular and Wisconsin, for as much of a defining battleground state as it is, tends to have no qualms in electing people well to the right of where the state should be. It's the GOP's second easiest chance at a pickup, but they did still in some ways make that job harder on themselves.

And by the way, I just learned about why Trump didn't endorse Kleefisch, and I can't beleive that I am still being surprised at what a petty, narcisstic, sociopathic b**** he is! Really!? Because her daughter went to a dance with a non-election denying Justice's son? How far-removed and tenuous is he taking his grudges now?!

Not true? Marquette has always had him above water IIRC, and Morning Consult had him down a few % I believe if that. That's not "unpopular"

I haven't seen any recent polling, I suppose. But last I remember he was underwater and had a reputation as not accomplishing a lot (though that might more be the fault of the Wisconsin legislature).

Last Marquette in June had him +3. Previous one before that had him +5

https://twitter.com/MULawPoll/status/1539668170700894210

I think people tend to assume he's unpopular because he only won narrowly in 2018 while in states with similar topline partisanship Dems won Gov by a lot like MI and PA. The dynamics in each one of these races was unique.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,305
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1613 on: August 10, 2022, 09:31:51 PM »

I might move this back to Toss-Up (still closer to Tilt R than Tilt D), but Democrats winning Wisconsin in a midterm for their party would be quite a departure from the norm.

An incumbent Democratic Wisconsin governor hasn't run for reelection in a Democratic midterm since 1978, and that was an ascended LG. If you're looking for a governor that was actually elected, it was... 1962? Not a lot of historical precedence to back up your assertion. Evers being an incumbent changes the dynamics here.

Fair enough, though Evers has never been especially popular, so I’m not sure how much his incumbency really helps.
Logged
Utah Neolib
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,971
Antarctica


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1614 on: August 10, 2022, 09:35:20 PM »

How is Michels an especially bad candidate? He generally seems like Generic R in every way to me.
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,679
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1615 on: August 10, 2022, 10:18:30 PM »

This is one of those elections that could proceed the end of WOW as a cohesive political unit. Washington County really appears to be going in a different direction from Ozaukee and Waukesha.

Washington is now way Trumpier than the other 2 and Ozaukee could plausibly be voting Dem soon.
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,028
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1616 on: August 10, 2022, 10:45:19 PM »

I might move this back to Toss-Up (still closer to Tilt R than Tilt D), but Democrats winning Wisconsin in a midterm for their party would be quite a departure from the norm.
Phil Murphy was the first Democratic Governor of New Jersey to be re-elected since 1978.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,305
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1617 on: August 10, 2022, 11:48:31 PM »

I might move this back to Toss-Up (still closer to Tilt R than Tilt D), but Democrats winning Wisconsin in a midterm for their party would be quite a departure from the norm.
Phil Murphy was the first Democratic Governor of New Jersey to be re-elected since 1978.

True, but New Jersey is way more Democratic than Wisconsin.
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,679
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1618 on: August 11, 2022, 01:01:05 AM »

How is Michels an especially bad candidate? He generally seems like Generic R in every way to me.

Yeah,  I don't get this.  If anything the outsider image should help. My understanding is that both candidates have randomly made a couple extremely socially conservative comments, but I think Michels comes off as more moderate overall? 
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,210


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1619 on: August 11, 2022, 08:33:10 AM »

How is Michels an especially bad candidate? He generally seems like Generic R in every way to me.

Yeah,  I don't get this.  If anything the outsider image should help. My understanding is that both candidates have randomly made a couple extremely socially conservative comments, but I think Michels comes off as more moderate overall? 

How is he an outsider? He ran for political races in WI as far back as 2004, so he's no stranger to politics.

Not sure how these comments are moderate:

-Claims 2020 election was rigged
-Said “everything was on the table”, including decertifying results
-Wants to dismantle the bipartisan commission that runs WI elections
-Favors 1849 abortion ban
-Calls for ‘public private partnership’ to counsel young woman with unexpected pregnancies
-Him and his wife are ‘pro life Christians’ who will ‘protect the unborn’

Just because an R candidate isnt a MTG or Lauren Boebert doesn't mean they are 'moderate', especially in a swing state like WI.

Election denying and abortion bans alone are extraordinarily extreme for a swing state.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,531
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1620 on: August 11, 2022, 03:59:37 PM »

How is Michels an especially bad candidate? He generally seems like Generic R in every way to me.

Yeah,  I don't get this.  If anything the outsider image should help. My understanding is that both candidates have randomly made a couple extremely socially conservative comments, but I think Michels comes off as more moderate overall? 

How is he an outsider? He ran for political races in WI as far back as 2004, so he's no stranger to politics.

Not sure how these comments are moderate:

-Claims 2020 election was rigged
-Said “everything was on the table”, including decertifying results
-Wants to dismantle the bipartisan commission that runs WI elections
-Favors 1849 abortion ban
-Calls for ‘public private partnership’ to counsel young woman with unexpected pregnancies
-Him and his wife are ‘pro life Christians’ who will ‘protect the unborn’

Just because an R candidate isnt a MTG or Lauren Boebert doesn't mean they are 'moderate', especially in a swing state like WI.

Election denying and abortion bans alone are extraordinarily extreme for a swing state.

Has been living in Connecticut for about the past decade too.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,531
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1621 on: August 12, 2022, 01:11:08 PM »

About time

Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,699


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1622 on: August 12, 2022, 01:58:40 PM »

About time



Vos should reimburse the taxpayers of Wisconsin for the money that was spent on this farcical investigation.
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,210


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1623 on: August 14, 2022, 10:59:30 AM »

WI GOP constantly giving things for Evers to run on

Logged
Senator Incitatus
AMB1996
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,505
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.06, S: 5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1624 on: August 14, 2022, 11:05:50 AM »

How is Michels an especially bad candidate? He generally seems like Generic R in every way to me.

Yeah,  I don't get this.  If anything the outsider image should help. My understanding is that both candidates have randomly made a couple extremely socially conservative comments, but I think Michels comes off as more moderate overall? 

You don’t understand—he was nominated by the Republican Party in 2022 and is therefore a horrible candidate. QED.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 60 61 62 63 64 [65] 66 67 68 69 70 ... 128  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.1 seconds with 11 queries.