Would Pussygate have been more damaging against another candidate?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 10:53:02 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Would Pussygate have been more damaging against another candidate?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Poll
Question: Would pussygate have been more damaging to trump against another democrat?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 76

Author Topic: Would Pussygate have been more damaging against another candidate?  (Read 3729 times)
morgankingsley
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,018
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: October 10, 2019, 12:41:09 AM »

Yes
Logged
Devout Centrist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,125
United States


Political Matrix
E: -99.99, S: -99.99

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: October 10, 2019, 03:48:01 AM »

I came back from Ohio (after fleeing from a major hurricane) to Florida and saw "Pussygate" on TV and thought Trump was finished.  And I was mega-disgusted with Trump . . . until I learned that the tape was from 2005 and was from the cutting room floor.

Classic Fuzzy!
Logged
Pericles
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,111


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: October 10, 2019, 03:54:55 AM »

I'm pretty sure sexual assault was unacceptable in 2005.
Logged
morgankingsley
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,018
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: October 10, 2019, 03:58:33 AM »

I'm pretty sure sexual assault was unacceptable in 2005.

But Trump seems to have a way to move above it better than anybody ever
Logged
Fuzzy Bear
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,715
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: October 10, 2019, 06:12:19 AM »
« Edited: October 10, 2019, 06:19:29 AM by Fuzzy Bear »

I'm pretty sure sexual assault was unacceptable in 2005.

But Trump seems to have a way to move above it better than anybody ever

The tape, however, was not evidence of sexual assault; it was a rather foolish grown man trash talking with another foolish grown man while the camera was still running.

Is this locker room talk?  It was when I played jock sports.

Is it right?  Of course not.  But it WAS an old tape, made while Trump was a private citizen.  That is relevant in making a decision on such a bizarre event as the revelation of that tape.

One could only speculate what JFK and RFK would be saying on tapes and videos recorded from Camelot (if there were such private tapes).  That doesn't make Trump's behavior right, either.

People are rightly indignant about running embarassing tapes of people that happened decades ago when those tapes don't contain any illegal activities.  They saw the treatment of Trump over that episode as fundamentally unfair.  I'm sure a lot of folks thought of some of their embarassing escapades that weren't taped and viewed the running of this tape (which was supposed to have been destroyed) as fundamentally unfair.
Logged
morgankingsley
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,018
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: October 10, 2019, 10:11:40 PM »

I'm pretty sure sexual assault was unacceptable in 2005.

But Trump seems to have a way to move above it better than anybody ever

The tape, however, was not evidence of sexual assault; it was a rather foolish grown man trash talking with another foolish grown man while the camera was still running.

Is this locker room talk?  It was when I played jock sports.


In all fairness this is what I have been saying since 2016
Logged
KaiserDave
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,622
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -5.39

P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: October 14, 2019, 10:26:43 AM »

Voted no, but meant to vote yes.
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: October 14, 2019, 05:26:46 PM »

The tape, however, was not evidence of sexual assault; it was a rather foolish grown man trash talking with another foolish grown man while the camera was still running.

Is this locker room talk?  It was when I played jock sports.

Is it right?  Of course not.  But it WAS an old tape, made while Trump was a private citizen.  That is relevant in making a decision on such a bizarre event as the revelation of that tape.
Speaking as someone who’s been in a locker room since the 1860s, no, that’s not how “normal guys” talk. I’ve heard lots of stupid things there, but I’ve never heard such repulsive, vulgar language from teenage boys.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 14 queries.