1988: Paul Simon vs HW Bush
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 04:41:43 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  1988: Paul Simon vs HW Bush
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 1988: Paul Simon vs HW Bush  (Read 652 times)
Pericles
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,113


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: March 18, 2019, 08:37:19 PM »

How would Illinois Senator Paul Simon have done if he'd won the Democratic nomination in 1988? Could he have been a more effective opponent to HW Bush than Dukakis, or would his brand of liberalism have been unappealing in 1988? What are your thoughts?
Logged
Lechasseur
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,779


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: 3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: March 20, 2019, 06:53:18 PM »

I think the result with Simon would have been roughly the same as the one with Dukakis
Logged
Fuzzy Bear
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,718
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: March 29, 2019, 11:07:27 PM »

Simon would have done better.  He'd have carried IL, MD, CT, and would have contended for CA, OH, MI, as well as winning the other Dukakis states (MA, NY, WV, WA, OR, IA, WI, and HI).  Simon wouldn't have had the Willie Horton issue on which Dukakis got creamed (in part because of his slowness to attack back).  Additionally, Simon (who was something of a nerd) was still a guy who could respond back with pep and self-assurance, without being the managerial type that Dukakis seemed to be.

Dukakis only lost by 7 points.  Simon would have pressed Dukakis much more strongly, and may have even won with a few breaks.
Logged
mianfei
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 322
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 15, 2020, 05:02:46 AM »
« Edited: October 17, 2020, 07:56:06 PM by mianfei »

Simon would have done better.  He'd have carried IL, MD, CT, and would have contended for CA, OH, MI, as well as winning the other Dukakis states (MA, NY, WV, WA, OR, IA, WI, and HI).  Simon wouldn't have had the Willie Horton issue on which Dukakis got creamed (in part because of his slowness to attack back).  Additionally, Simon (who was something of a nerd) was still a guy who could respond back with pep and self-assurance, without being the managerial type that Dukakis seemed to be.

Dukakis only lost by 7 points.  Simon would have pressed Dukakis much more strongly, and may have even won with a few breaks.
Given the farm crisis, and that he was morally fairly conservative for a Democrat, if Simon carried all the states you listed, he would probably have also carried the crisis-affected normally GOP states of MO, SD and MT, and come close in ND and even KS.

I have often looked for the possibility of 1988, with a less Northeastern Democratic candidate than Dukakis, being an 1896-type “deviating election”.

I observed that if Simon carried all the Dukakis states, all the states you added, plus Missouri, Montana and South Dakota, he would still have lost by 262 votes to 276.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 13 queries.