Freedom in the World: 2019 Report (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 01:03:36 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Freedom in the World: 2019 Report (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Freedom in the World: 2019 Report  (Read 1753 times)
Middle-aged Europe
Old Europe
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,205
Ukraine


« on: February 06, 2019, 03:43:28 AM »
« edited: February 06, 2019, 08:17:03 AM by Great Again: The Caveman Presidency »

* Hungary is now officially "partly free", the first EU country with this distinction.

The first one ever if I'm not mistaken. That certainly took a while, but it's a pretty big development. Tunisia and Senegal have now a better Freedom House rating then Hungary.
Logged
Middle-aged Europe
Old Europe
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,205
Ukraine


« Reply #1 on: February 06, 2019, 08:27:06 AM »

The G20 members ranked by their "aggregate score" (0 to 100):


"Free" countries

1. Canada (99)
2. Australia (98)
3. Japan (96)
4. Germany (94)
5. United Kingdom (93)
6. France (90)
7. Italy (89)
8. United States (86)
9. Argentina (84)
10. South Korea (83)
11. South Africa (79)
12. Brazil (75)
13. India (75)

"Partly Free" countries
14. Mexico (63)
15. Indonesia (62)

"Not Free" countries
16. Turkey (31)
17. Russia (20)
18. China (11)
19. Saudi Arabia (7)


(note: Brazil has a better "Civil Liberties" score than India, while both countries share the same "Political Rights" score. Therefore I put Brazil ahead of India.)
Logged
Middle-aged Europe
Old Europe
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,205
Ukraine


« Reply #2 on: February 07, 2019, 12:02:19 PM »

Why is Colombia considered to be partially free?

https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2018/colombia
Logged
Middle-aged Europe
Old Europe
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,205
Ukraine


« Reply #3 on: February 07, 2019, 02:12:51 PM »
« Edited: February 07, 2019, 02:18:07 PM by Great Again: The Caveman Presidency »

Calling Hungary "partly free" is ridiculous.


Well, as far as I understand their system, a country is automatically downgraded from "Free" to "Partly Free" as soon as the average of its "Political Rights" and "Civil Liberties" scores reaches a 3.0 out of 7, as it was the case here.

This happened because Hungary's "Civil Liberties" score was downgraded from a "2" to a "3" this year (the country's "Political Rights" had already been at "3" for the past two years now).

Reading Freedom House's country report on Hungary it seems like the downgrade in the "Civil Liberties" category specifically happened due to curtailments in the area of freedom of religion for both Christians and Muslims, as the report notes:


Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

So, it seems the downgrade to "Partly Free" was more like a "straw that broke the camel's back" moment. According to Freedom House's assessments, Hungary had already been edging pretty closely to the "Partly Free" status in 2016 and 2017 and this is what pushed it finally over the line.


Hungary did in fact also lose a point in the "Political Pluralism and Participation" sub-section of the "Political Rights" category this year, but apparently not enough to decrease the overall PR score from "3" to "4". The reports notes in that regard:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Middle-aged Europe
Old Europe
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,205
Ukraine


« Reply #4 on: February 08, 2019, 09:54:12 AM »

The event in Hungary seems to have been much bigger, and generally protesting in Morocco does have more negative repercussions, which means people will be much more reluctant to do so.

Well, I guess that's the reason why Hungary has a 3 out of 7 score on Civil Liberties, while Morocco has a 5 out of 7 score, which is considerably worse. The fact that two countries are both in the "Partly Free" category doesn't mean that they're identical. There's still a 1-to-7 scale.

According this year's Fredom House country report on Hungary, their "freedom of assembly" record is indeed still untainted, receiving 4 out of 4 possible points in that particular sub-category. It's just that this wasn't sufficient to keep them in the "Free" category in the overall scoring.

And while Hungary still receives the highest possible score in the "freedom of assembly" category, their assessement in this matter doesn't lack some criticism:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.


The 2019 country report for Morocco isn't online yet. Last year, Morocco had only 1 out of 4 points in the "freedom of assembly" category. So Freedom of House does indeed acknowledge that the situation of the freedom of assembly is considerably worse in Morocco than it is in Hungary. It just hasn't a effect on both countries' categorizations as "Partly Free", because aside from "freedom of assembly" their country reports list 24 other sub-categories where a country also receives assessment.
Logged
Middle-aged Europe
Old Europe
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,205
Ukraine


« Reply #5 on: February 08, 2019, 01:21:11 PM »

Why is Mexico only considered "Partially Free?"

https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2018/mexico
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 12 queries.