New Zealand political discussion thread
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 02:56:41 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  New Zealand political discussion thread
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 [16]
Author Topic: New Zealand political discussion thread  (Read 29086 times)
Pericles
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,116


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #375 on: March 14, 2024, 03:04:05 PM »

After so much grim news from the new government, we finally got some good news yesterday-

The YIMBYs win big in Wellington
Quote
There is no other way of putting it. The new Wellington District Plan is the biggest, fattest W in the history of the pro-housing movement in this country. For the Yimbys, the New City, the progressives, the urbanists, a City for People, for anyone who wants to own a townhouse or apartment in Wellington, this is an enormous, unprecedented victory.

In the stroke of a pen (and a six-hour meeting with many tedious amendment votes), Wellington has moved from the most restrictive housing market in New Zealand to the most permissive.
Quote
There were 26 proposed amendments on Thursday, and the Yimbys won every single one of them. Even watching from inside the room, it felt unbelievable, almost impossible. Wellington is a city that has been dominated for decades by the Old Town, a faction of powerful, wealthy residents who will do anything to prevent density and stop any change to the neighbourhoods they hold so dear.

There’s actually very little to analyse here. The meeting wasn’t subtle. It wasn’t complex. The Labour, Green and pro-housing independent councillors romped home. The independent hearings panel’s recommendations were so anti-housing they inspired a backlash, giving progressive councillors political cover to push for even denser housing than would have previously been possible. It was an overwhelmingly one-sided affair. But there are a few points that are worth a deeper dive.
Logged
Pericles
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,116


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #376 on: March 23, 2024, 10:22:48 PM »

Now that Labour's vote has been halved, maybe Chris Hipkins has grown a spine. Lol.
Labour leader Hipkins lambasts 'inequitable' tax system in State of the Nation speech
Quote
Hipkins said: "Our current economic model celebrates those who live off wealth over those who live off work. In the modern economy, contribution and reward aren’t as linked as they used to be.

"Hard work is no longer the ticket to getting ahead it should be. While some earn a lot more than they are worth, the majority are worth a lot more than they earn. Success and aspiration should be celebrated. But when hard work no longer pays off, it’s time for a rethink of the system."

Hipkins later continued: "Now is the time to have that debate. After the election, I said that all options around changes to the tax system were back on the table, and I meant it."

He explained his position: "Our current tax system is inequitable, and it’s unsustainable. We have one of the least diversified tax systems in the world, meaning public investment into things like health, education, welfare, housing and infrastructure is more reliant on income tax than most other countries we compare ourselves to.

"In other words, those who earn their living through their salary and wages are contributing a greater share than those who earn income through wealth. Under this government, those with multiple investment properties are getting huge tax breaks while those on salary and wages pay tax on every dollar they earn."

We've seen a bunch of this behaviour from Labour. Grant Robertson and the new Finance spokesperson suggesting the government should have borrowed more to fund infrastructure, and MP Deborah Russell even had the audacity right after the election to say they should have done a capital gains tax.

Who knows though, maybe they'll have to put their money where their mouth is sooner than we think?
The new government already gets rated just 4.6 out of 10 by the public
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 [16]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 11 queries.