Main topic for debate: if unionization is supposed to be to the benefit of the workers, what's wrong with letting all of the affected workers vote?
I, for one, believe that union membership is a force for good in a workplace, especially in an era like ours where economic inequality is on the rise around the world. This bill will strengthen unions, and this is also why I don't believe in the "right-to-work" school of labor policy which, in my opinion, would allow employers to take advantage of their workers and cause more harm than good.
*My post is ONLY in my capacity as a voter and not GM*
I'm doing my best to avoid direct policy advocacy now, but I will say that your above response did not really answer my question of what's wrong with letting all of the affected workers vote first ...
Could you please try again beginning with something like: "I do not think all affected workers should vote on whether or not to unionize because [insert your answer here]"? Thanks.
*My post is ONLY in my capacity as a voter and not GM*
