Wedding between fezzyfestoon and Rin-chan

[Sam Spade]

So... are we legally married or not?  I'm confused...

Rin-chan

You are married.  In Atlasia your marriage is now legally defined as a civil union, per Article 2, Clause 2 of the act listed below. 

I will be challenging EarlAW's law in two months when I move to the Northeast because it is simply illegal according to the Atlasian Constitution. 

However, I will say that I was long in support of giving the powers to define marriage and divorce to the Regions, rather than the federal government.  That would give EarlAW the power to do what he is presently doing. 

I would also note that EarlAW voted against allowing the Regions to establish uniform laws on Marriage and Divorce, creating a highly amusing little conundrum. 

I would read Atlasia v. StatesRights here and my Elimination of Civil Marriage Law and Establishement of Civili Union Act, especially Article 2 for clarifications on what I am saying above.

[The Dowager Mod]

Why are you moving to the northeast?

[Sam Spade]

Why are you moving to the northeast?

To challenge EarlAW's law if it passes.

Also, I want to get a feel of other Atlasian Regions, so I'm making a little tour.

[Hatman 🍁]

So... are we legally married or not?  I'm confused...

Rin-chan

You are married.  In Atlasia your marriage is now legally defined as a civil union, per Article 2, Clause 2 of the act listed below. 

I will be challenging EarlAW's law in two months when I move to the Northeast because it is simply illegal according to the Atlasian Constitution. 

However, I will say that I was long in support of giving the powers to define marriage and divorce to the Regions, rather than the federal government.  That would give EarlAW the power to do what he is presently doing. 

I would also note that EarlAW voted against allowing the Regions to establish uniform laws on Marriage and Divorce, creating a highly amusing little conundrum. 

I would read Atlasia v. StatesRights here and my Elimination of Civil Marriage Law and Establishement of Civili Union Act, especially Article 2 for clarifications on what I am saying above.

I did? Or was this part of some sort of omnibus bill that I may have disagreed with other parts?

[Bleeding heart conservative, HTMLdon]

So... are we legally married or not?  I'm confused...

Rin-chan

You are married.  In Atlasia your marriage is now legally defined as a civil union, per Article 2, Clause 2 of the act listed below. 

I will be challenging EarlAW's law in two months when I move to the Northeast because it is simply illegal according to the Atlasian Constitution. 

However, I will say that I was long in support of giving the powers to define marriage and divorce to the Regions, rather than the federal government.  That would give EarlAW the power to do what he is presently doing. 

I would also note that EarlAW voted against allowing the Regions to establish uniform laws on Marriage and Divorce, creating a highly amusing little conundrum. 

I would read Atlasia v. StatesRights here and my Elimination of Civil Marriage Law and Establishement of Civili Union Act, especially Article 2 for clarifications on what I am saying above.

I did? Or was this part of some sort of omnibus bill that I may have disagreed with other parts?

The federal Civil Union standard that we have now is perfectly acceptable and appropriate.  I do hope that the citizens of the northeast region would not sacrifice the civil union rights of gays and lesbians in the southeast region just so that the northeast could use the religious term "marriage" in their laws.

[Sam Spade]

So... are we legally married or not?  I'm confused...

Rin-chan

You are married.  In Atlasia your marriage is now legally defined as a civil union, per Article 2, Clause 2 of the act listed below. 

I will be challenging EarlAW's law in two months when I move to the Northeast because it is simply illegal according to the Atlasian Constitution. 

However, I will say that I was long in support of giving the powers to define marriage and divorce to the Regions, rather than the federal government.  That would give EarlAW the power to do what he is presently doing. 

I would also note that EarlAW voted against allowing the Regions to establish uniform laws on Marriage and Divorce, creating a highly amusing little conundrum. 

I would read Atlasia v. StatesRights here and my Elimination of Civil Marriage Law and Establishement of Civili Union Act, especially Article 2 for clarifications on what I am saying above.

I did? Or was this part of some sort of omnibus bill that I may have disagreed with other parts?

https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=22722.0

[Hatman 🍁]

Oh, I guess I was concerned that if the Senate had control of marriage, it would be able to protect it. Obviously, I was wrong.

[Sam Spade]

Oh, I guess I was concerned that if the Senate had control of marriage, it would be able to protect it. Obviously, I was wrong.

Assumptions always make an "ass" of someone. 

Still, the move to marriages=civil unions under the law for all was expected when the Senate become more Libertarian, and I have seen any real opposition before this.

I can't say it didn't stop StatesRights from trying to start a rebellion again, at least it was not over the issue

[7,052,770]

Sorry I couldn't make the wedding guys, but yall definitely need to swing by Mississippi in your honeymoon!

[Bleeding heart conservative, HTMLdon]

*wonders if its acceptable to give that high of a gift to a Senate candidate during campaign season*