Is there a Bradley Effect going on in FL?

[Frozen Sky Ever Why]

Do you agree with Sanchez that the Bradley Effect is the cause of Gillum's lead?

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

No, because the Bradley Effect doesn't exist. It didn't exist in 2012, or 2008...or even in 1982, where the last poll showed Bradley +1. The claims that Bradley "led by double digits" in the 1982 CA Gubernatorial election are referring to polls months before. The idea the Bradley Effect ever existed is based on intellectual dishonesty.

[An American Tail: Fubart Goes West]

Something is weird with the Florida polls, but I don’t know what. Herding maybe?

[Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers]

No, because something real is going on with Latinos and Blacks. That Hillary was looking for in 2016, turnout among these ethnic groups will help Pelosi win FL and win the House in 2018

[ON Progressive]

No, because the Bradley Effect doesn't exist. It didn't exist in 2012, or 2008...or even in 1982, where the last poll showed Bradley +1. The claims that Bradley "led by double digits" in the 1982 CA Gubernatorial election are referring to polls months before. The idea the Bradley Effect ever existed is based on intellectual dishonesty.

[Rookie Yinzer]

No, because the Bradley Effect doesn't exist. It didn't exist in 2012, or 2008...or even in 1982, where the last poll showed Bradley +1. The claims that Bradley "led by double digits" in the 1982 CA Gubernatorial election are referring to polls months before. The idea the Bradley Effect ever existed is based on intellectual dishonesty.

[RussFeingoldWasRobbed]

No, because the Bradley Effect doesn't exist. It didn't exist in 2012, or 2008...or even in 1982, where the last poll showed Bradley +1. The claims that Bradley "led by double digits" in the 1982 CA Gubernatorial election are referring to polls months before. The idea the Bradley Effect ever existed is based on intellectual dishonesty.

[Wisconsin SC Race 2019]

Didn't happen with Obama...in this very state. Why would it happen now?

[Atlas Force]

No, because the Bradley Effect doesn't exist. It didn't exist in 2012, or 2008...or even in 1982, where the last poll showed Bradley +1. The claims that Bradley "led by double digits" in the 1982 CA Gubernatorial election are referring to polls months before. The idea the Bradley Effect ever existed is based on intellectual dishonesty.

[bagelman]

Even if the Bradley effect did exist (it doesn't, see above) you can't prove it's happening until after DeSantis wins.

[bestgtor22]

They might try to call it a Bradley effect but I think its more likely many of these polls are using faulty assumptions or are guessing wrong on the breakdown of the vote some way.

[RI]

It is actually possible for a pollster to test for the Bradley effect/social desirability bias. They never do, though.

[Antonio the Sixth]

lol

[Lourdes]

No, because the Bradley Effect doesn't exist. It didn't exist in 2012, or 2008...or even in 1982, where the last poll showed Bradley +1. The claims that Bradley "led by double digits" in the 1982 CA Gubernatorial election are referring to polls months before. The idea the Bradley Effect ever existed is based on intellectual dishonesty.

[Person Man]

Even if the Bradley effect did exist (it doesn't, see above) you can't prove it's happening until after DeSantis wins.

Even then, that's still blaming the ice cream on the many rapes. (Correlation and causation are separate) In this case, I really can't think of any other variables.

[JerryArkansas]

Do you agree with Sanchez

The answer to any statment that he makes is no, its always made in either bad faith or downright dishonesty.

[AudmanOut]

No, because the Bradley Effect doesn't exist. It didn't exist in 2012, or 2008...or even in 1982, where the last poll showed Bradley +1. The claims that Bradley "led by double digits" in the 1982 CA Gubernatorial election are referring to polls months before. The idea the Bradley Effect ever existed is based on intellectual dishonesty.

[Indy Texas]

Pretty much everything that has happened in America for the past three years suggests people do not feel any need to hide their racism.

[#TheShadowyAbyss]

No, because the Bradley Effect doesn't exist. It didn't exist in 2012, or 2008...or even in 1982, where the last poll showed Bradley +1. The claims that Bradley "led by double digits" in the 1982 CA Gubernatorial election are referring to polls months before. The idea the Bradley Effect ever existed is based on intellectual dishonesty.

[Atlas Has Shrugged]

Told ya.