NM-ABQ Journal/Research & Polling Inc.: Final poll has MLG (D) ahead by 10 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 09:14:17 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2018 Gubernatorial Election Polls
  NM-ABQ Journal/Research & Polling Inc.: Final poll has MLG (D) ahead by 10 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NM-ABQ Journal/Research & Polling Inc.: Final poll has MLG (D) ahead by 10  (Read 3094 times)
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,841
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« on: November 04, 2018, 01:37:05 PM »

Dominating! Pearce should really stop trying to run statewide, lol.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,841
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #1 on: November 04, 2018, 04:18:50 PM »

I was always wary of taking Steve Pearce's internals at face value. Time for a ratings change, I guess:

Steve Pearce: Strong Candidate™ -> Weak Candidate™
Michelle Lujan-Grisham: Weak Candidate™ -> Strong Candidate™

LOL, bold. Personally I only feel comfortable moving Steve Pearce from Strong Strong Candidate™ to Lean Tilt Weak Candidate™ at the moment, but ask me after Tuesday. Smiley
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,841
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #2 on: November 04, 2018, 04:24:10 PM »

Were people ever seriously considering MLG a weak candidate and Steve Pearce a strong one? I can't recall anyone doing that. Not that I would be surprised because this IS Atlas we're talking about.

Yes, people were unironically saying this stuff due to Steve Pearce's internal polls from 18 months before the election. Classic Atlas, LOL.

https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=265558.0
https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=289916.0

Of course there were a few voices of reason, like MT Treasurer and Mizzouian. What a "coincidence." Tongue
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,841
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #3 on: November 04, 2018, 04:34:04 PM »

Were people ever seriously considering MLG a weak candidate and Steve Pearce a strong one? I can't recall anyone doing that. Not that I would be surprised because this IS Atlas we're talking about.

Yes, people were unironically saying this stuff due to Steve Pearce's internal polls from 18 months before the election. Classic Atlas, LOL.

https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=265558.0
https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=289916.0

Of course there were a few voices of reason, like MT Treasurer and Mizzouian. What a "coincidence." Tongue

LMAO.

I find it amazing that LimoLiberal was one of the most reasonable people on those threads. Predictably, it was UncleSam making a bad take:
This’ll be way closer than it should be, and in a neutral environment Pearce would win. Won’t be a neutral environment though. Ds should take this.

Lol, the only evidence for this claim is an internal poll by the R that shows him losing. Has the RGA or DGA reserved airtime? GTFO with this "way closer than it should be"

I think that was when LimoLiberal was on thin ice and about to be banned so he stopped the concern trolling for a while. Because he also joined the "Pearce will win" brigade later when he felt more secure.

But yeah, it's funny how people always accuse me of "strawmanning" when I laugh at sh*t Atlas says like this, then they of course run away from the thread when I link to the proof (COUGH BRTD.)
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.03 seconds with 13 queries.