Sickening. So many Democrats will continue to fall for "moderate" Republicans.
What's wrong with this? And why "moderate" in quotes, he isn't one? Charlie has been a great governor and should continue his work. I would vote for him more enthusiastically than I'd vote for Liz Warren.
Hopefully he gets to 70%. Nothing against Gonzalez though, he's a good man but running the wrong race and the wrong time.
I fully agree with this. Partisans such as New Frontier would rather vote straight-ticket Democratic and would never deviate from that. I have no problem voting for good politicians from either party, who are dedicated to their constituents and effectively address the issues.
Sickening. So many Democrats will continue to fall for "moderate" Republicans.
What's wrong with this? And why "moderate" in quotes, he isn't one? Charlie has been a great governor and should continue his work. I would vote for him more enthusiastically than I'd vote for Liz Warren.
Hopefully he gets to 70%. Nothing against Gonzalez though, he's a good man but running the wrong race and the wrong time.
I fully agree with this. Partisans such as New Frontier would rather vote straight-ticket Democratic and would never deviate from that. I have no problem voting for good politicians from either party, who are dedicated to their constituents and effectively address the issues.
This is not true. Charlie Baker is only a "moderate" because of the Democratic legislature. I don't even have a problem with him winning. Both of you don't know anything about my political philosophy.
You won't see Wyoming or Utah electing a Democratic governor in the foreseeable future. Yet Democratic states are supposed elect "moderate" Republicans. Why is that?
