MA-Western New England University: Baker +38

[Calthrina950]

Baker (R, inc.): 65%
Gonzalez (D): 27%

402 LV.

https://www1.wne.edu/news/2018/10/2018-mass-poll.cfm


Safe RINO, nothing to see here.

I am so glad to see that ticket-splitting is not dead, and that Massachusetts is giving an excellent Governor another term. And this is yet another poll showing Baker outperforming Warren.

[Calthrina950]

Baker (R, inc.): 65%
Gonzalez (D): 27%

402 LV.

https://www1.wne.edu/news/2018/10/2018-mass-poll.cfm


Safe RINO, nothing to see here.

I am so glad to see that ticket-splitting is not dead, and that Massachusetts is giving an excellent Governor another term. And this is yet another poll showing Baker outperforming Warren.

Yup, what an irony that a GOP governor wins a massive landslide reelection in one of the bluest states in a blue wave year. Even though he's a RINO.

Or a moderate Republican. Of which there used to be many.

[Calthrina950]

Sickening. So many Democrats will continue to fall for "moderate" Republicans.

What's wrong with this? And why "moderate" in quotes, he isn't one? Charlie has been a great governor and should continue his work. I would vote for him more enthusiastically than I'd vote for Liz Warren.

Hopefully he gets to 70%. Nothing against Gonzalez though, he's a good man but running the wrong race and the wrong time.

I fully agree with this. Partisans such as New Frontier would rather vote straight-ticket Democratic and would never deviate from that. I have no problem voting for good politicians from either party, who are dedicated to their constituents and effectively address the issues.

[Calthrina950]

Sickening. So many Democrats will continue to fall for "moderate" Republicans.

What's wrong with this? And why "moderate" in quotes, he isn't one? Charlie has been a great governor and should continue his work. I would vote for him more enthusiastically than I'd vote for Liz Warren.

Hopefully he gets to 70%. Nothing against Gonzalez though, he's a good man but running the wrong race and the wrong time.

I fully agree with this. Partisans such as New Frontier would rather vote straight-ticket Democratic and would never deviate from that. I have no problem voting for good politicians from either party, who are dedicated to their constituents and effectively address the issues.

Sickening. So many Democrats will continue to fall for "moderate" Republicans.

What's wrong with this? And why "moderate" in quotes, he isn't one? Charlie has been a great governor and should continue his work. I would vote for him more enthusiastically than I'd vote for Liz Warren.

Hopefully he gets to 70%. Nothing against Gonzalez though, he's a good man but running the wrong race and the wrong time.

I fully agree with this. Partisans such as New Frontier would rather vote straight-ticket Democratic and would never deviate from that. I have no problem voting for good politicians from either party, who are dedicated to their constituents and effectively address the issues.

This is not true. Charlie Baker is only a "moderate" because of the Democratic legislature. I don't even have a problem with him winning. Both of you don't know anything about my political philosophy.

You won't see Wyoming or Utah electing a Democratic governor in the foreseeable future. Yet Democratic states are supposed elect "moderate" Republicans. Why is that?

Because Massachusetts actually has a robust Republican party that produces plenty of moderates. Wyoming and (to a lesser extent) Utah do not. They have no Democratic infrastructure producing those candidates consistently.

Agreed. And if New Frontier truly believes that all Republicans are "evil, racist, extreme, ideological fundamentalists who will destroy this country", then I feel sorry for him. If I said the same about Democrats, what would the response be?