bullmoose vs. Cosmo Kramer
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 13, 2025, 05:08:45 PM
News: Election Calculator 3.0 with county/house maps is now live. For more info, click here

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Forum Community
  Forum Community Election Match-ups (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Spiral, KoopaDaQuick, KaiserDave)
  bullmoose vs. Cosmo Kramer		 « previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Poll
Question: who do you vote for/who wins?
#1
bullmoose/bullmoose		  
#2
bullmoose/Preston		  
#3
Preston/bullmoose		  
#4
Preston/Preston		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 27

Author Topic: bullmoose vs. Cosmo Kramer  (Read 3793 times)
falling apart like the ashes of American flags
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 118,130
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 20, 2005, 10:31:55 AM »
Now this is an interesting one. What would a map be?
Logged
CheeseWhiz
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,538


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 20, 2005, 10:36:16 AM »
bullmoose/bullmoose.
Logged
Bleeding heart conservative, HTMLdon
htmldon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,982
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.03, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 20, 2005, 10:39:38 AM »
^^^^^^^
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,126
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 20, 2005, 10:47:38 AM »
Probably bullmoose/bullmoose.
Logged
TommyC1776
KucinichforPrez
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,163


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 20, 2005, 05:18:25 PM »
bullmoose
Logged
jokerman
Cosmo Kramer
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,808
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 20, 2005, 06:10:08 PM »
Cosmo Kramer - 47
Bull Moose - 37
Green Party - 9
Constitution Party (or far right independent) - 7
Logged
Akno21
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,066
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 20, 2005, 06:13:03 PM »
You wouldn't win Maryland, Preston.
Logged
jokerman
Cosmo Kramer
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,808
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 20, 2005, 06:19:07 PM »
Quote from: Akno21 on October 20, 2005, 06:13:03 PM
You wouldn't win Maryland, Preston.
I wasn't sure how rural it was.  I knew I wouldn't go well in the suburbs but I thought I could do well enough in Baltimore and the rural areas to pull it off.  Part of Maryland is still in the South culturally, or at least I hope.
Logged
Akno21
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,066
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 20, 2005, 06:34:39 PM »
Quote from: Cosmo Kramer on October 20, 2005, 06:19:07 PM
Quote from: Akno21 on October 20, 2005, 06:13:03 PM
You wouldn't win Maryland, Preston.
I wasn't sure how rural it was.  I knew I wouldn't go well in the suburbs but I thought I could do well enough in Baltimore and the rural areas to pull it off.  Part of Maryland is still in the South culturally, or at least I hope.

I hope none of Maryland is still in the South culturally. You'd probably get Western Maryland and the Eastern Shore easily, but most of the state is in the DC/Baltimore corridor, where you'd get nailed. I guess if you do well enough in Baltimore you could win the state, but I don't see them being too energetic to get out to vote for you, neither candidate would be especially appealing to the poverty stricken inner city African american.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 20, 2005, 07:42:24 PM »
Quote from: Cosmo Kramer on October 20, 2005, 06:10:08 PM
Cosmo Kramer - 47
Bull Moose - 37
Green Party - 9
Constitution Party (or far right independent) - 7




What kind of electoral votes are you using?

Anyway, bullmoose/bullmoose. Americans are not going to elect a "silly populist."
Logged
jokerman
Cosmo Kramer
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,808
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 20, 2005, 08:39:21 PM »
Quote from: A18 on October 20, 2005, 07:42:24 PM
Quote from: Cosmo Kramer on October 20, 2005, 06:10:08 PM
Cosmo Kramer - 47
Bull Moose - 37
Green Party - 9
Constitution Party (or far right independent) - 7




What kind of electoral votes are you using?

That was the predicted popular vote percentage.
Logged
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 20, 2005, 08:46:11 PM »
Quote from: Akno21 on October 20, 2005, 06:34:39 PM
I hope none of Maryland is still in the South culturally. You'd probably get Western Maryland and the Eastern Shore easily, but most of the state is in the DC/Baltimore corridor, where you'd get nailed. I guess if you do well enough in Baltimore you could win the state, but I don't see them being too energetic to get out to vote for you, neither candidate would be especially appealing to the poverty stricken inner city African american.

He'd be hurting in the DC 'burbs, but he could carry Baltimore City, the black suburban vote, the Eastern Shore, and the West. That's enough to pull a win if he doesn't totally collapse in Baltimore County.
Logged
bullmoose88
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,514


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: October 21, 2005, 01:49:22 AM »
Eh I think it'd be closer than that...I could possibly hold my own in my state (just out of loyalty and if need be, racking up margins in suburbia)...possibly take NY (but that'd require some work)...maybe florida (we'd see a 1960-70s sort of county map there...GOP down south and Dem North)...Montana would probably be mine...Indiana...possibly...if they vote solidly GOP no matter what like they tend to do.

but yeah...a democrat winning Utah...this would be the case.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 56,343


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: October 21, 2005, 02:04:33 AM »
Logged
bullmoose88
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,514


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: October 22, 2005, 01:33:51 AM »

Is Grey undecided? or 3rd party?
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 56,343


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: October 22, 2005, 01:37:45 AM »

Undecided.
Logged
Platypus
hughento
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,478
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: October 22, 2005, 09:11:09 AM »
if grey is undecided, add MN, MD and AZ to the list. Also, i'm fairly sure RI would go for Bullmoose, and MA too. I'd also give Preston Michigan.
Logged
jokerman
Cosmo Kramer
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,808
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: October 22, 2005, 09:57:19 AM »
Quote from: hughento on October 22, 2005, 09:11:09 AM
if grey is undecided, add MN, MD and AZ to the list. Also, i'm fairly sure RI would go for Bullmoose, and MA too. I'd also give Preston Michigan.
I would agree with Massachusetts, but Rhode Island would definitly go for me.  It has a strongly Democratic tilt, and really has populist leanings too.
Logged
Max Power
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,182
Political Matrix
E: 1.84, S: -8.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: October 22, 2005, 10:19:04 AM »
Quote from: Cosmo Kramer on October 22, 2005, 09:57:19 AM
I would agree with Massachusetts, but Rhode Island would definitly go for me.  It has a strongly Democratic tilt, and really has populist leanings too.
The closest Rhode Island has to a populist tilt is Jack Reed. JACK REED!!! Wink
Logged
jokerman
Cosmo Kramer
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,808
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: October 22, 2005, 10:49:35 AM »
Quote from: Lt. Governor Max Power on October 22, 2005, 10:19:04 AM
Quote from: Cosmo Kramer on October 22, 2005, 09:57:19 AM
I would agree with Massachusetts, but Rhode Island would definitly go for me.  It has a strongly Democratic tilt, and really has populist leanings too.
The closest Rhode Island has to a populist tilt is Jack Reed. JACK REED!!! Wink
It is pro-life, though, or at least more than most other New England States.
Logged
Max Power
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,182
Political Matrix
E: 1.84, S: -8.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: October 22, 2005, 10:56:28 AM »
Quote from: Cosmo Kramer on October 22, 2005, 10:49:35 AM
Quote from: Lt. Governor Max Power on October 22, 2005, 10:19:04 AM
Quote from: Cosmo Kramer on October 22, 2005, 09:57:19 AM
I would agree with Massachusetts, but Rhode Island would definitly go for me.  It has a strongly Democratic tilt, and really has populist leanings too.
The closest Rhode Island has to a populist tilt is Jack Reed. JACK REED!!! Wink
It is pro-life, though, or at least more than most other New England States.
Yeah, Rhode Island's pro-life. And Massachusetts is so conservative, we should call it Alabama junior. Roll Eyes
Logged
Storebought
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,326
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: October 22, 2005, 11:08:28 AM »
Quote from: Lt. Governor Max Power on October 22, 2005, 10:56:28 AM
Quote from: Cosmo Kramer on October 22, 2005, 10:49:35 AM
Quote from: Lt. Governor Max Power on October 22, 2005, 10:19:04 AM
Quote from: Cosmo Kramer on October 22, 2005, 09:57:19 AM
I would agree with Massachusetts, but Rhode Island would definitly go for me.  It has a strongly Democratic tilt, and really has populist leanings too.
The closest Rhode Island has to a populist tilt is Jack Reed. JACK REED!!! Wink
It is pro-life, though, or at least more than most other New England States.
Yeah, Rhode Island's pro-life. And Massachusetts is so conservative, we should call it Alabama junior. Roll Eyes

No, Preston's right about RI comparative New England pro-lifeness. One of their congressmen, Langevin, is a pro-lifer.
Logged
Max Power
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,182
Political Matrix
E: 1.84, S: -8.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: October 22, 2005, 11:16:30 AM »
Quote from: Storebought on October 22, 2005, 11:08:28 AM
Quote from: Lt. Governor Max Power on October 22, 2005, 10:56:28 AM
Quote from: Cosmo Kramer on October 22, 2005, 10:49:35 AM
Quote from: Lt. Governor Max Power on October 22, 2005, 10:19:04 AM
Quote from: Cosmo Kramer on October 22, 2005, 09:57:19 AM
I would agree with Massachusetts, but Rhode Island would definitly go for me.  It has a strongly Democratic tilt, and really has populist leanings too.
The closest Rhode Island has to a populist tilt is Jack Reed. JACK REED!!! Wink
It is pro-life, though, or at least more than most other New England States.
Yeah, Rhode Island's pro-life. And Massachusetts is so conservative, we should call it Alabama junior. Roll Eyes

No, Preston's right about RI comparative New England pro-lifeness. One of their congressmen, Langevin, is a pro-lifer.
That doesn't mean anything. They also have Lincoln Chaffee, Jack Reed, and Kennedy, That's 3-1. If each one represents 25%, that means 75% is pro-choice. Rhode Island being 'pro-life' is a political myth.
Logged
Storebought
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,326
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: October 22, 2005, 11:22:24 AM »
Quote from: Lt. Governor Max Power on October 22, 2005, 11:16:30 AM
Quote from: Storebought on October 22, 2005, 11:08:28 AM
Quote from: Lt. Governor Max Power on October 22, 2005, 10:56:28 AM
Quote from: Cosmo Kramer on October 22, 2005, 10:49:35 AM
Quote from: Lt. Governor Max Power on October 22, 2005, 10:19:04 AM
Quote from: Cosmo Kramer on October 22, 2005, 09:57:19 AM
I would agree with Massachusetts, but Rhode Island would definitly go for me.  It has a strongly Democratic tilt, and really has populist leanings too.
The closest Rhode Island has to a populist tilt is Jack Reed. JACK REED!!! Wink
It is pro-life, though, or at least more than most other New England States.
Yeah, Rhode Island's pro-life. And Massachusetts is so conservative, we should call it Alabama junior. Roll Eyes

No, Preston's right about RI comparative New England pro-lifeness. One of their congressmen, Langevin, is a pro-lifer.
That doesn't mean anything. They also have Lincoln Chaffee, Jack Reed, and Kennedy, That's 3-1. If each one represents 25%, that means 75% is pro-choice. Rhode Island being 'pro-life' is a political myth.

OK, then.
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: October 22, 2005, 06:12:47 PM »
this is a tough one, BullMoose/Bullmoose, i guess.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.073 seconds with 12 queries.