TX Quinnipiac: Cruz +9

[Mr. Smith]

Winning TN is still more likely than winning TX

Not anymore, might as well say Bayh Bayh, for Return of the Bredi is now more like Revenge of the B*^ch.

@MT Treasurer: Fiorina agreed to one debate and got herself classed by all accounts, I knew conservatives that immediately went over to Boxer, all while still hanging on to Meg "forgot to vote a few times" Whitman. Also Boxer had more tenure and was more agreeable than Cruz.

Beto has been more pro-active in comparison.

[Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers]

Winning TX is more realistic, now

[Progressive Pessimist]

Neither Texas nor Tennessee are or were ever realistic wins. Taking back the Senate was never realistic. The only realistic thing that can work in the Democrats' favor is to flip Arizona and Nevada while mitigating any loses at all, or even losing just one seat at most. And even then, those scenarios would still be quite the feat.

[Figueira]

Taking back the Senate was never realistic. The only realistic thing that can work in the Democrats' favor is to flip Arizona and Nevada while mitigating any loses at all

Uh, that would be taking back the Senate. Of course, North Dakota seems like a stretch.

[Dukakisite1988]

The only hope for this race (and many other races) now is Trump doing or saying something incredibly stupid and/or controversial before election day.

[Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers]

The only hope for this race (and many other races) now is Trump doing or saying something incredibly stupid and/or controversial before election day.

8 point lead isn't that big, turnout can overcome that, but TN is safe R

[Progressive Pessimist]

Taking back the Senate was never realistic. The only realistic thing that can work in the Democrats' favor is to flip Arizona and Nevada while mitigating any loses at all

Uh, that would be taking back the Senate. Of course, North Dakota seems like a stretch.

It would be a tied Senate which still basically means Republican control. And as I said, that's going to be really tough.

[Antonio the Sixth]

Taking back the Senate was never realistic. The only realistic thing that can work in the Democrats' favor is to flip Arizona and Nevada while mitigating any loses at all

Uh, that would be taking back the Senate. Of course, North Dakota seems like a stretch.

It would be a tied Senate which still basically means Republican control. And as I said, that's going to be really tough.

No, the scenario you describe is 51D-49R. Do the math.

[Progressive Pessimist]

Taking back the Senate was never realistic. The only realistic thing that can work in the Democrats' favor is to flip Arizona and Nevada while mitigating any loses at all

Uh, that would be taking back the Senate. Of course, North Dakota seems like a stretch.

It would be a tied Senate which still basically means Republican control. And as I said, that's going to be really tough.

No, the scenario you describe is 51D-49R. Do the math.

I was referring to a scenario without Heitkamp. I forgot to make that clear, sorry. And again, both are going to be extremely difficult, and as I see it, unlikely.