MI-Mitchell Research: Stabenow +9
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 06, 2022, 02:05:25 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2018 Senatorial Election Polls (Moderator: Brittain33)
  MI-Mitchell Research: Stabenow +9
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: MI-Mitchell Research: Stabenow +9  (Read 2047 times)
Dr Oz Hater
PittsburghSteel
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,791
United States


P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 10, 2018, 02:46:08 PM »
« edited: October 10, 2018, 02:53:05 PM by PittsburghSteel »

James trails Stabenow 42-51%

But a very misleading tweet about it thatís gaining traction:



The last Mitchell poll was D+13, not +18.

This pollsterís numbers are definitely more R-friendly than the other Michigan pollsters.

Still Safe D, no matter how much the Republicans want to believe their cool black guy can win.
Logged
ON Progressive
OntarioProgressive
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,109
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -8.70


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 10, 2018, 02:51:21 PM »

LMAO.
Logged
NUPES Enjoyer
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 55,563
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 10, 2018, 02:52:10 PM »

#StabenowUnder52
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,000
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 10, 2018, 02:53:36 PM »

If the tweet was misleading, why did you post it?
Logged
Dr Oz Hater
PittsburghSteel
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,791
United States


P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 10, 2018, 02:55:43 PM »

If the tweet was misleading, why did you post it?

Because it was the only source available at the time.
Logged
Co-Chair Bagel23
Bagel23
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,387
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.48, S: -1.83


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 10, 2018, 02:59:23 PM »

Likely D race is likely D.
Logged
ON Progressive
OntarioProgressive
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,109
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -8.70


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 10, 2018, 03:00:17 PM »


FTFY
Logged
Co-Chair Bagel23
Bagel23
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,387
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.48, S: -1.83


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 10, 2018, 03:01:15 PM »


No
Logged
Co-Chair Bagel23
Bagel23
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,387
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.48, S: -1.83


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 10, 2018, 03:04:51 PM »

My friend who has family from Botson and who convinced me to put Warren at likely D had this race at lean D.
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,978
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 10, 2018, 03:07:59 PM »

Logged
Dr Oz Hater
PittsburghSteel
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,791
United States


P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 10, 2018, 03:09:26 PM »


You guys seriously believe thereís a ratís ass chance someone as popular in their state as Stabenow loses in this climate?
Logged
bilaps
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,267
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 10, 2018, 03:10:00 PM »

Well, with WI poll showing D+10, this is not looking totaly out of sphere of possibility
Logged
bilaps
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,267
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: October 10, 2018, 03:14:33 PM »


You guys seriously believe thereís a ratís ass chance someone as popular in their state as Stabenow loses in this climate?

Who said that? Whom are you fighting with?
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,549
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: October 10, 2018, 04:00:31 PM »

#JamesSurging
#2016Redux
#DemsInDisarray
Logged
Galaxie
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 519


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: October 10, 2018, 06:29:53 PM »

My friend who has family from Botson and who convinced me to put Warren at likely D had this race at lean D.

What kind of argument could have convinced you to put Warren at likely D?
Logged
Skye
yeah_93
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,567
Venezuela


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: October 10, 2018, 07:48:43 PM »

I can believe James ends up at 42%.
Logged
Co-Chair Bagel23
Bagel23
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,387
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.48, S: -1.83


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: October 10, 2018, 07:52:08 PM »

My friend who has family from Botson and who convinced me to put Warren at likely D had this race at lean D.

What kind of argument could have convinced you to put Warren at likely D?

Heís a smart dude and he told me to trust him so I did.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,549
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: October 10, 2018, 08:17:42 PM »

My friend who has family from Botson and who convinced me to put Warren at likely D had this race at lean D.

What kind of argument could have convinced you to put Warren at likely D?

Heís a smart dude and he told me to trust him so I did.

Well, one of my friends with a big brain, very big brain, told me that there's no way Cantwell can win again. Should I trust him and put WA-SEN at Safe R?
Logged
Co-Chair Bagel23
Bagel23
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,387
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.48, S: -1.83


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: October 10, 2018, 08:19:19 PM »

My friend who has family from Botson and who convinced me to put Warren at likely D had this race at lean D.

What kind of argument could have convinced you to put Warren at likely D?

Heís a smart dude and he told me to trust him so I did.

Well, one of my friends with a big brain, very big brain, told me that there's no way Cantwell can win again. Should I trust him and put WA-SEN at Safe R?

No, because that's just too far beyond the pale, unless he has like good evidence that she is a Moorean disciple.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,849
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: October 11, 2018, 01:24:57 AM »

Kid Rock would've made this a toss up imo tbh tbh imho. #CandidateQualityMatters
Logged
Lean Branson
Doctor Imperialism
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,030


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: October 11, 2018, 01:33:29 AM »

Kid Rock would've made this a toss up imo tbh tbh imho. #CandidateQualityMatters

I had forgotten about Kid Rock, lol. #Just2017AtlasThings
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,849
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: October 11, 2018, 01:44:50 AM »

Kid Rock would've made this a toss up imo tbh tbh imho. #CandidateQualityMatters

I had forgotten about Kid Rock, lol. #Just2017AtlasThings

#never4getsenrock
Logged
politicallefty
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,714
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -9.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: October 11, 2018, 01:56:52 AM »

Michigan polling can be really bad sometimes, as we're all aware. I doubt Stabenow fails to break 60%. She's noncontroversial, very likeable, and fits the state very well.
Logged
jamestroll
jamespol
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,809


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: October 11, 2018, 02:10:34 AM »


Candidate quality is a factor. Less so than in the past but still a factor. Not sure why everyone on this site thinks it makes NO difference whatsoever.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,849
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: October 11, 2018, 02:39:22 AM »


Candidate quality is a factor. Less so than in the past but still a factor. Not sure why everyone on this site thinks it makes NO difference whatsoever.

Well, for one thing, that post was a joke. Tongue

I don't believe anyone ever claimed it makes no difference whatsoever, particularly in extreme cases like Roy Moore. Just that fundamentals, partisanship, political environment, etc. are the main drivers of the vast majority of election outcomes, especially in the present day. Even in one of the most extreme examples, 91% of Republicans still voted for a literal pedophile (see sig.)
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.043 seconds with 13 queries.