NJ-Stockton: Menendez +2 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 16, 2024, 12:10:08 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2018 Senatorial Election Polls
  NJ-Stockton: Menendez +2 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NJ-Stockton: Menendez +2  (Read 4136 times)
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,283
United States


« on: October 01, 2018, 10:18:06 AM »

Safe D, Menendez will win no matter what (and would have won even in a Clinton midterm, lol) since he has that magical (D) next to his name. I don’t actually blame any Democrat for voting for him, but it’s sad that this scumbag made it out of the primary.
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,283
United States


« Reply #1 on: October 01, 2018, 12:21:47 PM »

Safe D, Menendez will win no matter what (and would have won even in a Clinton midterm, lol) since he has that magical (D) next to his name. I don’t actually blame any Democrat for voting for him, but it’s sad that this scumbag made it out of the primary.

lol no

Zero chance NJ is sending a Republican, no matter how moderate they are, to the Senate. Zero reason to believe that Clinton would have been unpopular in NJ of all places. MT, ND, IN, MO, OH, WV, etc.? Sure.
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,283
United States


« Reply #2 on: October 01, 2018, 12:43:38 PM »

IL 2010, DE 2010 if Republicans didnt nomiante O'Donnell


Tom Kean would be the next senator

Blue states have gotten much more polarized since then. Even in 2014, the GOP did terribly in states far less Democratic than NJ (MI/MN/etc.). IL-SEN 2010 and MA-SEN 2010 were outliers, not the norm.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 13 queries.