S-18.3-16: Southern Tax Relief Act (Statute) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 10:36:34 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government
  Regional Governments (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  S-18.3-16: Southern Tax Relief Act (Statute) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: S-18.3-16: Southern Tax Relief Act (Statute)  (Read 2522 times)
Filinovich
AdamFilinovich
Rookie
**
Posts: 181
United States


« on: September 13, 2018, 04:54:29 PM »

I've just noticed what I would consider to be an issue with this bill. A person making exactly $12,999.99 would be highly discouraged from earning an extra cent a year. Their federal income taxes would go from $0 to $650 (Assuming my math is correct). Granted, this isn't a radical change (about $12 a week), but it is an issue. I'm not sure how it would be solved or if it is possible to solve. Perhaps a more gradual shift from full to half reclaim would be possible.

In any event, I still think this bill would have a positive effect and I don't intend to vote against purely because a statistically insignificant group would be discouraged from picking up a penny off the ground.

I patiently await the estimate from the GM.
Logged
Filinovich
AdamFilinovich
Rookie
**
Posts: 181
United States


« Reply #1 on: September 30, 2018, 05:36:59 AM »

What? Why?
Logged
Filinovich
AdamFilinovich
Rookie
**
Posts: 181
United States


« Reply #2 on: October 08, 2018, 12:15:02 PM »

If the GM office is not going to provide an estimate, I do not see how we can even consider this legislation.
Patience is a virtue.
Logged
Filinovich
AdamFilinovich
Rookie
**
Posts: 181
United States


« Reply #3 on: October 16, 2018, 02:19:56 PM »

I motion for a vote to table this legislation as the GM is refusing to give us an estimate.
I object to the motion to table.
Logged
Filinovich
AdamFilinovich
Rookie
**
Posts: 181
United States


« Reply #4 on: October 21, 2018, 08:55:02 AM »

Looks good to me, as that doesn't even factor in the potential growth that could come from lowering these taxes.
Logged
Filinovich
AdamFilinovich
Rookie
**
Posts: 181
United States


« Reply #5 on: October 21, 2018, 02:58:03 PM »

In the absence of a deputy GM to run an official estimate, I can certify this as a reasonably accurate projection, given available information.
In that case, I motion for a final vote.
Logged
Filinovich
AdamFilinovich
Rookie
**
Posts: 181
United States


« Reply #6 on: October 21, 2018, 04:44:27 PM »

In that case, I motion for a final vote.
Move this motion to the new amended version
Logged
Filinovich
AdamFilinovich
Rookie
**
Posts: 181
United States


« Reply #7 on: October 24, 2018, 02:08:06 PM »

Aye.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 14 queries.