Judge Orders 17-Year-Old Girl Not To Have Sex
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 08, 2024, 01:25:49 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Judge Orders 17-Year-Old Girl Not To Have Sex
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Poll
Question: Do you support the judges probation conditions
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
#3
Unsure
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 30

Author Topic: Judge Orders 17-Year-Old Girl Not To Have Sex  (Read 2074 times)
TommyC1776
KucinichforPrez
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,162


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: October 07, 2005, 07:35:13 PM »

yes
Logged
Everett
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,549


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: October 07, 2005, 08:08:07 PM »

Well, as an alternative, the girl could have been sentenced to prison. I'm sure that there's no shortage of sex in there. *cough*
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: October 10, 2005, 01:19:53 AM »

    These rulings are absolutely unconstitutional.  Taking away body piercing and tatoos takes away from our first ammendment right of expression.  The no sex ruling is also a complete violation of that girls rights.  I think the judge should be kicked from the bench and all of the unorthadox ruling should be sent back to court with the state picking up legal fees.

Those are rights of a free citizen, not of a convicted criminal.

A judge can sentence her to prison, where:

1.  She will be told where to sleep.

2.  Where and what food to eat.

3.  Where to work, probably in a field on a Hoe Squad.

4.  When to talk.

5.  What close to wear.

6.  What jewelry she can have.

7.  How to wear her hair, and makeup.

8.  What to read.

9.  Who she can see socially and what amount of physical contact she can have.

10.  What television she can watch.

11.  How to address guards.

12.  What to eat; she can be force fed if she doesn't eat.

13.  When to bathe.

Further, the criminal can, as a practical matter, say, "I'll violate these terms."  The order cannot prevent these things from happening, only inflict a penalty if she chooses to do them.  The penalty is much harsher that the parole.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: October 10, 2005, 05:59:41 AM »

Well, as an alternative, the girl could have been sentenced to prison. I'm sure that there's no shortage of sex in there. *cough*

They would put her in the female prison, and I doubt there is much sex there.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 13 queries.